High Court Judge Steven Chong had rejected Singapore Democratic Party’s Dr Chee Soon Juan’s appeal for free speech yesterday, slapping a $20,000 fine and a 20-weeks imprisonment in default.

On 20 June 2006, Chee was charged with eight counts of speaking in public without a licence between 13 November 2005 and 22 April 2006 on the basis that he allegedly violated the Public Entertainments and Meeting Act.

Four charges were left on appeal; the Attorney-General dropped three charges and Chee served a jail term for one.

The following is an excerpt from the Singapore Democrats website.

Source: news.sawf.org


Dr Chee Soon Juan’s appeals to the Judiciary to protect the freedom of speech of Singaporeans has again failed. High Court Judge Steven Chong this morning upheld Dr Chee’s convictions for speaking in public without a permit.

The SDP leader was sentenced to $20,000 fine and 20-weeks imprisonment in default. Dr Chee was given until 10 Feb 11 before beginning his jail term.

In his submissions, Dr Chee had argued that the system was abused by the PAP and laws were being used by the ruling party to deny the opposition and civil society from exercising their political rights.

With civil liberties, the opposition and the people are prevented from publicly discussing and bringing pressure to bear on the PAP to protect their economic rights.

Shorn of their rights, Singaporeans today find themselves in a helpless position even as they find their jobs threatened and their wages decline. They continue to remain at the mercy of a Government whose greatest priority to take care of the elite.

To continue reading, click here.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Blogger Roy Ngerng urges Singaporean civil servants to be inspired by Hong Kongers to stand for the people

Taiwanese-based Singaporean activist and blogger Roy Ngerng Yi Ling took to his…

李显扬助范国瀚支付两万元上诉担保金费用

此前被判藐视法庭罪的范国瀚,在推特分享获得已故总理李光耀之子,也是现任总理李显龙弟弟李显扬的襄助,为他负担上诉的两万元担保金(security for costs)费用。 在昨日,他分享里律师告知他到最高法院上诉需缴两万元的担保金,如果上诉失败,这笔担保金也拿不回,“正义也不便宜啊!”(Justice is not cheap!) My lawyers have informed me…

社交媒体批判声音有存在必要 安华:掌权者不应阻挠

邻国马来西亚人民公正党主席安华(Dato’ Seri Anwar bin Ibrahim) 认为,社交媒体是公共討论、针砭时弊的最佳平台,政府不应多加管控。 根据邻国《东方日报》报道,安华在“2019年社交媒体週”致辞时,认为掌权者不应阻挠社交媒体上的言论自由。 安华曾是烈火莫熄运动的精神领袖,如今也是波德申国会议员。 “为推动国家进步,社媒上的討论与批判声音有存在必要,这是言论自由的体现,政府或掌权者不应阻挠。”他说道。 社交媒体旨在监督当朝政府 安华强调,社交媒体的角色,不是当权者的传声筒,旨在监督当朝政府,理应对监督政治人物是否随着人民意愿执政。 他表示前朝政府试图以法限制社交媒体的言论自由,这是错误的示范。他还说:“只有贪腐及丑闻缠身的政府,才会想方设法干预社媒,因为他们倍感恐惧。“…

拒邀性少数维权份子主讲 圣若瑟副校长:行动主义导致社会分裂

圣若瑟书院副校长陈顺德(译音)认为,行动主义推动社会变革,会造成社会群体的分裂。 在本月20日,跨大学LGBT网络研究与宣传总监Racheal Yeo,原受邀在圣若瑟书院举行的TEDx青年讲座主讲,却在最后一分钟被腰斩。 此事也引来数家新加坡网媒如本社、“椰子网”和“独立网”报导,引起网民关注国内性少数群体(LGBTQ+)在一些主流场合持续被排挤、歧视的情况。 根据日前他向天主教学校学生一次致词的录音音频,陈顺德解释为何该校最后一刻拒绝邀请性少数维权份子Racheal Yeo。 他呼吁学生们认清,将来他们学成踏入社会,言行将对周遭人产生影响,必须谨言慎行。 “可能是五个人、500人甚至5千人,就像成为公共服务署长的圣若瑟校友,旗下统领6万下属,包括我。他的言行将影响6万人,乃至百万新加坡人,对吗?就如副总理张志贤,也是我们的校友,其职务亦举足轻重。“ 他劝谕学生在面对眼前时局,应抱持谨慎心态。希望学生们离开圣若瑟时,已准备好面对、成为有能力领导、作出影响力的角色。 陈顺德为校方最后一刻拒绝邀请Racheal Yeo辩解,后者乃LGBTQ性少数群体的社运份子,捍卫性少数群体权益。他希望学生们厘清“行动主义”(activism)的定义,以及它是否适用于新加坡社会情境。 冀学生以“和平方式”推动社会变革…