by Rachel Chan

What could Singaporeans expect from the opposition party founded by the late Joshua Benjamin Jeyaretnam? Would they try to raise anti-incumbent sentiment amongst the audience? Or would they spend more time outlining alternative policies?

It was a little bit of both.

The Reform Party rally, held at Speaker’s Corner on a rainy Saturday afternoon, continually questioned the actions of the incumbent PAP. But it also managed to raise awareness on many of the alternate solutions available to the issues concerning Singaporeans – mainly the influx of foreigners, high ministerial pay, as well as the increasing income divide.

Alec Tok speaking at the rally

A high point came early in a speech by Alec Tok, one of the party members running for parliament.

“Do you see that white elephant behind you?” he asked. (He was referring to the sheltered stage about fifty meters away, where more than half of those who attended the rally were standing.)

“We are not allowed to use that! We are only allowed to be here. That is why we are standing in the rain. But if you can stand in the rain, than we can also stand in the rain!”

His speech highlighted the importance of improving the productivity of Singapore’s labour force – a key issue he posited is overlooked by the current administration.

This was followed by a speech by Kenneth Jayaretnam, the party leader. “I did national service, I was born here, and my parents were among the first citizens of Singapore,” he said. In his speech, Jeyaretnam carefully highlighted the areas of inadequacy in the current government, but made it clear that change depended on Singaporeans to take action.

“Don’t just go home and vent steam on the internet, and come elections day, get confused into voting for the incumbent for returning a fraction of your tax dollars!” Jeyaretnam told the crowd.

Nonetheless, there were reservations toward some of criticisms levelled against the PAP by the Reform Party. For instance, the vague descriptions of Jeyaretnam’s doubts on the quality of Singapore’s economic growth were not based on concrete facts and figures, but conjectures of transfer pricing.

“I would like to know how much tax these companies pay, how many Singaporeans they employ, what subsidies were given to them to come here, what prices are used to measure the value of their output. It’s possible that because they pay little or no tax in Singapore, that these companies use artificially high prices when they sell their group output to other group companies so as to minimize their tax bills… Whatever this accurses, the net effect may be to inflate our GDP statistics,” Jeyaretnam said.

Be that as it may, Jeyaretnam raised some important questions to the audience on issues, such as affordable long-term housing, savings in CPF, as well as further promising a change on the foreign labour policy and a wider focus on development outside of economic growth.

For many, the rally on Saturday was an opportunity to listen to an alternative voice and possibility of change from the current norm. “I’m just here to look see,” said an elderly man, who refused to be named. Certainly, a fear of being seen as openly supportive of the opposition hung over the event. But beyond this fear, the rally seemed to be channelling voter disaffection over contemporary politics amidst a genuine craving for an alternate solution.

One of the most significant things that can be taken away from the rally was the goal of the Reform Party: they were not just aiming to provide an alternative voice in parliament, or reduce the majority of the PAP, but to form the majority government itself.

“We’re here to form the government, whether it should take one year, ten years, or a hundred years,” Jeyaretnam declared.

But whether the Reform Party can do that will be up to Singaporeans to decide.

Rachel is a final year undergraduate majoring in English, Politics and Psychology at the Australian National University in Canberra.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Netizens highlight ground reality after study reveals household income from work for poor families dropped 69% in 2020 due to pandemic

A recent study released on Tuesday (9 Feb) revealed that the median…

精英制度忽略贫富差距复杂因素 严燕松冀扶持同胞携手共进

尽管并没有出现在国家信约、国歌中,但似乎精英治国(Meritocracy)被吹捧为治国的“金科玉律”。工人党阿裕尼集选区议员严燕松提醒,精英政治固然对于打击贪腐、裙带关系是很好的准则,但似乎对每个公民都以能力和成就角度看待,而分出次优等级。 他打个比方,对于小孩我们是否也要以精英制度来苛求他们?如果考了不好的成绩,就只能吃快熟面、睡小房间?但对于我们的社会却是:你赚的不多,你就活该拥有糟糕的生活条件。 对此严燕松提及贫富差距中的复杂因素,则就好比一些人起跑条件优越,提前20米、跑道畅通无阻、还有良师指导,但遗憾的是,有些人的起跑线却可能从后方10米开始。 他指出,工人党对新加坡的愿景是国人都能达成他们的梦想,透过有竞争力的本地公司、活力经济,国人能合力打造这个家园。同时,一个有问责制的健全机制,比任何政党都更能持久。 要实现这愿景,就必须确保家庭能抵御生活中的风暴、校园能让学生为生存做好准备;社会安全网也能确保那些不慎跌倒的人,能够再次站起。 然而精英制度不看这些复杂因素,仅强调个人成就。“但我们是一个国家,不是一家企业。我们是同胞们的守护者。我们需要扶助彼此走完赛道。” 严燕松是在新加坡透视论坛,为“展望2030年新加坡政治”的对话会上,这么指出。 受邀嘉宾也包括卫生部兼通讯及新闻部高级政务部长普杰立医生,以及前进党非选区议员潘群勤。 严燕松也强调,目前面对的问题尤为复杂,需要各界的集思广益,而不是比赛谁能更快提出好主意,异议人士也不该被指责,“所有利益相关者应该合作而不是竞争,以找到应对挑战的最佳解决方案。” 普杰立:两党制由国人决定 回溯2011年,新加坡总理李显龙,曾表示两党制在新加坡根本行不通。治国最关键的是人才,唯有让A队有最大的成功机会,才能保障国家的前途,不能为了反对党所说的“买保险”,而去削弱A队。 对此,有与会者在会上抛出质问,从去年选举可见,人民希望看到更多反对党声音,行动党是否支持这种观点。…