Connect with us

Current Affairs

Green Volunteer Founder: Attending conferences about global warming ‘a waste of time’

Published

on

by Howard Lee

For me, COP16 was a complete let-down. Countries waited for countries to commit to binding agreements to tackle climate change. No one wanted to make the first move towards protecting the environment.

Singapore’s position at the conference was no different. It is still something that I frown upon, as I have always believed that, instead of seeing curbs on emissions as a handicap, we should seize the opportunity to make ourselves the test-bed for a green city that other countries can model after, and creating home-grown green energy solutions that we can export. Yes, forget the casinos. This is true enterprise that will never find lack of global demand. It is something we can still achieve, as meaningful as the need to protect our environment.

Meanwhile, all these international shenanigans cannot stop the dedication of some of our local volunteers, dedicated to do the right thing for Earth. This article is an interview with Grant W. Pereira of the Green Volunteers, a local group that is dedicated to re-establishing our lost flora, animal protection, and public education to increase awareness about our natural environment.

What do you feel is the most pressing environmental or conservation concern for Singapore? Where have we done well or poorly?

In Singapore, our most pressing problem is the pressing problem of freely available plastic bags. Per captia, we are one of the biggest users of plastic bags in the world. These bags take literally hundreds of years to dissolve and if incinerated the toxic fumes cause grave health problems. If countries like Taiwan, Australia, now Italy and even Bangladesh can ban these harmful bags, our government should have the political will to do the same.

What we do well is the ”clean and green” campaign we have had for a few years. We have beautiful and well maintained parks in Singapore. It’s a great idea but I think more effort should be made to reintroduce more native plants and trees so that our native fauna can return.

The Green Volunteers have a programme called S.P.R.O.U.T.S. [Singaporeans Proudly Replanting Our Unique Trees and Shrubs] to reintroduce native flora back into our parks.

I personally think it’s a waste of time attending global conferences about climate change/global warming. All we need worldwide is to plant more trees to slow this down.

What are your views on the level of awareness and contribution among Singaporeans on these issues?

Generally, Singaporeans are aware of local and global environmental issues, but many don’t give a damn. If you go to a park on a Monday (especially during school holidays) you would be shocked at the amount of rubbish/trash around these pits even when there are rubbish bins so close by. Singapore is known as a ”clean and green” city simply because we have laws against littering and socially unacceptable behaviour. I wonder what the situation would be if there were no fines or corrective work orders against littering.

What can private, public and people sectors do to enhance conservation efforts?

I believe education is the only way to get the message across. Environmental discussion should be held at all schools. This should be held on a Friday (last class) so students can practice what was discussed over the weekend.

What would you say is the Green Volunteers’ single biggest contribution to Singapore?

The Green Volunteers contributions to our environment are numerous. We have given many talks about the environment to schools, done many mangrove replanting and cleanups. I regularly bring students to China, Malaysia, Indonesia and Thailand to do social and environmental projects. Over the last 12 years we have planted more than 250,000 trees in this region. We stopped Resorts World, through a campaign, from bringing in the endangered whale shark to their resort. We wrote an interactive booklet about the Pulau Ubin sensory walk.

What are the priorities of the Green Volunteers for 2011? Any alignment with international conservation movements?

Our goal is to continue to do what we do, but with more intensity, getting more volunteers to make this happen. We will soon start a bluefin awareness campaign as many consumers don’t realise that the tuna stock is as endangered as the panda. We work closely with the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society.

Learn more about the numerous ongoing projects by visiting the Green Volunteers blog, or email Grant Pereira at [email protected].

Howard Lee is a corporate communication professional and volunteers with a local marine conservation group.

Continue Reading
Click to comment
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Current Affairs

TJC issued 3rd POFMA order under Minister K Shanmugam for alleged falsehoods

The Transformative Justice Collective (TJC) was issued its third POFMA correction order on 5 October 2024 under the direction of Minister K Shanmugam for alleged falsehoods about death penalty processes. TJC has rejected the government’s claims, describing POFMA as a tool to suppress dissent.

Published

on

The Transformative Justice Collective (TJC), an advocacy group opposed to the death penalty, was issued its third Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act (POFMA) correction direction on 5 October 2024.

The correction was ordered by Minister for Home Affairs and Law, K Shanmugam, following TJC’s publication of what the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) alleges to be false information regarding Singapore’s death row procedures and the prosecution of drug trafficking cases.

These statements were made on TJC’s website and across its social media platforms, including Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, and X (formerly Twitter).

In addition to TJC, civil activist Kokila Annamalai was also issued a correction direction by the minister over posts she made on Facebook and X between 4 and 5 October 2024.

According to MHA, these posts echoed similar views on the death penalty and the legal procedures for drug-related offences, and contained statements that the ministry claims are false concerning the treatment of death row prisoners and the state’s legal responsibilities in drug trafficking cases.

MHA stated that the posts suggested the government schedules and stays executions arbitrarily, without due regard to legal processes, and that the state does not bear the burden of proving drug trafficking charges.

However, these alleged falsehoods are contested by MHA, which maintains that the government strictly follows legal procedures, scheduling executions only after all legal avenues have been exhausted, and that the state always carries the burden of proof in such cases.

In its official release, MHA emphasised, “The prosecution always bears the legal burden of proving its case beyond a reasonable doubt, and this applies to all criminal offences, including drug trafficking.”

It also pointed to an article on the government fact-checking site Factually to provide further clarification on the issues raised.

As a result of these allegations, both TJC and Annamalai are now required to post correction notices. TJC must display these corrections on its website and social media platforms, while Annamalai is required to carry similar notices on her Facebook and X posts.

TikTok has also been issued a targeted correction direction, requiring the platform to communicate the correction to all Singapore-based users who viewed the related TJC post.

In a statement following the issuance of the correction direction, TJC strongly rejected the government’s claims. The group criticised the POFMA law, calling it a “political weapon used to crush dissent,” and argued that the order was more about the exercise of state power than the pursuit of truth. “We have put up the Correction Directions not because we accept any of what the government asserts, but because of the grossly unjust terms of the POFMA law,” TJC stated.

TJC further argued that the government’s control over Singapore’s media landscape enables it to push pro-death penalty views without opposition. The group also stated that it would not engage in prolonged legal battles over the POFMA correction orders, opting to focus on its abolitionist work instead.

This marks the third time TJC has been subject to a POFMA correction direction in recent months.

The group was previously issued two orders in August 2024 for making similar statements concerning death row prisoners.

In its latest statement, MHA noted that despite being corrected previously, TJC had repeated what the ministry views as falsehoods.

MHA also criticised TJC for presenting the perspective of a convicted drug trafficker without acknowledging the harm caused to victims of drug abuse.

Annamalai, a prominent civil rights activist, is also known for her involvement in various social justice campaigns. She was charged in June 2024 for her participation in a pro-Palestinian procession near the Istana. Her posts, now subject to correction, contained information similar to those presented by TJC regarding death penalty procedures and drug-related cases.

POFMA, which was introduced in 2019, allows the government to issue correction directions when it deems falsehoods are being spread online.

Critics of the law argue that it can be used to suppress dissent, while the government asserts that it is a necessary tool for combating misinformation. The law has been frequently invoked against opposition politicians and activists.

As of October 2024, Minister K Shanmugam has issued 17 POFMA directions, more than any other minister. Shanmugam, who was instrumental in introducing POFMA, is followed by National Development Minister Desmond Lee, who has issued 10 POFMA directions.

Major media outlets, including The Straits Times, Channel News Asia, and Mothership, have covered the POFMA directions. However, as of the time of writing, none have included TJC’s response rejecting the government’s allegations.

Continue Reading

Current Affairs

Hotel Properties Limited suspends trading ahead of Ong Beng Seng’s court hearing

Hotel Properties Limited (HPL), co-founded by Mr Ong Beng Seng, has halted trading ahead of his court appearance today (4 October). The announcement was made by HPL’s company secretary at about 7.45am, citing a pending release of an announcement. Mr Ong faces one charge of abetting a public servant in obtaining gifts and another charge of obstruction of justice. He is due in court at 2.30pm.

Published

on

SINGAPORE: Hotel Properties Limited (HPL), the property and hotel developer co-founded by Mr Ong Beng Seng, has requested a trading halt ahead of the Singapore tycoon’s scheduled court appearance today (4 October) afternoon.

This announcement was made by HPL’s company secretary at approximately 7.45am, stating that the halt was due to a pending release of an announcement.

Mr Ong, who serves as HPL’s managing director and controlling shareholder, faces one charge under Section 165, accused of abetting a public servant in obtaining gifts, as well as one charge of obstruction of justice.

He is set to appear in court at 2.30pm on 4 October.

Ong’s charges stem from his involvement in a high-profile corruption case linked to former Singaporean transport minister S Iswaran.

The 80-year-old businessman was named in Iswaran’s initial graft charges earlier this year.

These charges alleged that Iswaran had corruptly received valuable gifts from Ong, including tickets to the 2022 Singapore Formula 1 Grand Prix, flights, and a hotel stay in Doha.

These gifts were allegedly provided to advance Ong’s business interests, particularly in securing contracts with the Singapore Tourism Board for the Singapore GP and the ABBA Voyage virtual concert.

Although Iswaran no longer faces the original corruption charges, the prosecution amended them to lesser charges under Section 165.

Iswaran pleaded guilty on 24 September, 2024, to four counts under this section, which covered over S$400,000 worth of gifts, including flight tickets, sports event access, and luxury items like whisky and wines.

Additionally, he faced one count of obstructing justice for repaying Ong for a Doha-Singapore flight shortly before the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB) became involved.

On 3 October, Iswaran was sentenced to one year in jail by presiding judge Justice Vincent Hoong.

The prosecution had sought a sentence of six to seven months for all charges, while the defence had asked for a significantly reduced sentence of no more than eight weeks.

Ong, a Malaysian national based in Singapore, was arrested by CPIB in July 2023 and released on bail shortly thereafter. Although no charges were initially filed against him, Ong’s involvement in the case intensified following Iswaran’s guilty plea.

The Attorney-General’s Chambers (AGC) had earlier indicated that it would soon make a decision regarding Ong’s legal standing, which has now led to the current charges.

According to the statement of facts read during Iswaran’s conviction, Ong’s case came to light as part of a broader investigation into his associates, which revealed Iswaran’s use of Ong’s private jet for a flight from Singapore to Doha in December 2022.

CPIB investigators uncovered the flight manifest and seized the document.

Upon learning that the flight records had been obtained, Ong contacted Iswaran, advising him to arrange for Singapore GP to bill him for the flight.

Iswaran subsequently paid Singapore GP S$5,700 for the Doha-Singapore business class flight in May 2023, forming the basis of his obstruction of justice charge.

Mr Ong is recognised as the figure who brought Formula One to Singapore in 2008, marking the first night race in the sport’s history.

He holds the rights to the Singapore Grand Prix. Iswaran was the chairman of the F1 steering committee and acted as the chief negotiator with Singapore GP on business matters concerning the race.

 

Continue Reading

Trending