by Gerald Giam

Source: Workers' Party

It may come as a surprise to some, but I disagree with former Nominated MP Siew Kum Hong’s view that “school and grassroots work don’t mix” (Today newspaper, 4 January 2011). Mr Siew felt that “partisan activities that favour a specific political party or politician should not be officially sanctioned and endorsed by the Ministry of Education (MOE) or schools” and that “campaigning for political parties and politicians is clearly improper in schools and workplaces”.

I disagree with the thinking that if you are still in school, then you should avoid partisan politics; that politics is somehow an “adults-only” activity which will corrupt young minds. Consequently, this leads to local schools and even universities banning any partisan political organisations. For example, in the National University of Singapore, students who are interested in politics can only join a club like the Democratic Socialist Club, which disavows any political affiliation. In contrast, when I was studying in the University of Southern California, there was a College Republicans club and and College Democrats club. Members openly supported and campaigned for Republican or Democratic candidates during the local, state or national elections. A search on the Internet will find numerous Republican or Democrat clubs in high schools across the US.

I see nothing wrong with young people, even minors, getting involved in politics. Politics affects all our lives–yes even the young lives. If we can get more young people to understand the issues, to get involved in supporting a cause they earnestly believe in, or to help organise a political campaign, I believe our next generation will become much more engaged and civic minded than they are now. Politics is not inherently evil, just like television or the Internet aren’t inherently bad. It’s only when it is abused does it corrupt.

I think what Mr Siew was really concerned about–which of course he couldn’t explicitly say if he wanted his letter published–was the MOE supporting the PAP’s political outreach activities on campus. I share this concern too.

I believe the real reason why the PAP bans partisan political clubs on campus is to prevent young minds from being shaped by alternative political ideas. They know that impressionable young people are more easily ‘converted’ to agree with the opposition cause than older adults. However when it comes to clubs that support the PAP, these are given the green light.

The Boon Lay Youth Club (BLYC) was founded in 2003 by the son of PAP MP Mdm Ho Geok Choo to, among other things, help out at PAP MPs’ Meet-the-People sessions and organise PAP grassroots activities where PAP MPs are invited as guests of honour. According to a Straits Times report, Mdm Ho successfully lobbied the then-Senior Minister of State for Education for BLYC to be recognised as a co-curricular activity (CCA) in her son’s school (whereby students can earn points for favourable admission to university). This wish was promptly granted. Mdm Ho proudly declared to the Straits Times that “the Youth Club has become an appendage of the Boon Lay (PAP) grassroots organisations”. Years later, the current president of the club sees nothing wrong in writing an article for the PAP’s organ, Petir, and signing off as the president of BLYC.

Now that the MOE has given official sanction to BLYC, I wonder if they would give their approval if a club in a junior college were to be set up in support of an opposition party MP.

This article first appeared in Gerald Giam’s blog

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

疑起争执大声追赶攻击 女子“脱掉”图诬陷德士司机

一名女郎追着一名男子大骂,边走边抛手提袋,女郎到半路开始脱衣服至半裸,还不停止怒骂。反而是她身后的男子趋前帮她穿好衣服,并将她劝服。女子随后以造成公众骚扰为由,被警方逮捕。 事件发生在周四(10月24日)凌晨2时许,在密驼路(Middle Road)和实利基路(Selegie Road)的交界处。 署名Lawrence Xiaolong(简称Lawrence)的网友于昨日下午4时许,上传一段名为“实利基路半裸女子事件的真实故事”的视频。 视频一开始就见一名穿着黑色连身裙的女子,追骂着一名穿着红色T恤的男子,甚至还挥手打人、丢手提包,而男子却尽量闪躲,快步走远。该男子随后被认出是一名德士司机。 但是女子追赶时忽然开始脱下连身裙,将裙子踢开后开始脱内裤,并对着德士司机喊道,“你怎么能扒我的衣服?” 这是一直在现场的一名白衣男子朝女子走进,帮她拉起内裤、拾起裙子,还尝试劝服她不要继续追赶德士司机。 有关的视频一经传出,立刻吸引网民注意和疯传,至今有将近九万人看过。 部分网民认为该女子或许喝醉酒了、或是嗑药了。 录下视频协助司机搜证…

“山寨版”官方打假账号? 通讯新闻部:“FActually”非官方脸书专页

为了厘清坊间流言和澄清事实,政府官网gov.sg有个名为Factually网页链接。不过通讯与新闻部澄清,在脸书上的“ FActually Singapore”,并不是官方的脸书专页。 如果浏览“FActually Singapore”的脸书和Instagram账号,可能让民众误以为这是官方在社交媒体的账号: 内容宣扬和转发政府政策 不过若仔细浏览其内文,行文和处理报导的方式,都会令人质疑这是否是隶属于官方的账号。不过一些内容则赞扬一些官方政策,或是转发官方资讯等。充其量是个亲政府的粉丝专页。 而本社记者也向通讯与新闻部求证,有关专页是否是官方经营的账号,后者也证实,不论是“FActually Singapore”的社交媒体账号,都不是官方经营的。 新加坡商号进军中国也被山寨 这也让小编想起在中国常出现各种玩弄字母的山寨仿冒商号或品牌,例如最近竟冒出名为“Cherlss & Keich”的山寨品牌,让人误以为是正版新加坡时尚名牌“Charles…

SPP’s Jose Raymond ready to contest in upcoming GE, says outreach work in Potong Pasir began three years ago

The Chairman of Singapore People’s Party (SPP) Jose Raymond took to his…