By Dr Wong Wee Nam

It is no good for democracy for a country to be run by a monolithic political party. Neither is it good to have a ragtag army of small political parties running around unable to provide a coherent alternative, let alone forming a government.

It is for this reason that for the past one year, I have been trying to get the opposition parties to try to come together to work out a common plan to contest this coming general election. To this end, I roped in Mr. Bentley Tan to help.

For a start, we decided to get the various parties to meet informally and without a fixed agenda to feel things out. The first meeting at a local hotel was called on 24 April 2010. Mr Tan Kin Lian, as a non-partisan, was also invited by us to help us moderate.

The response was encouraging. SDP’s Dr Chee Soon Juan came, so did SPP’s Sin Kek Tong, NSP’s Sebastian Teo and USD’s Jaslyn Go.

Kenneth Jeyaraetnam turned down the invitation because he thought such a meeting was unnecessary. The PKMS were not invited because there was no clear leadership at that time. The Worker’s Party did not respond.

It was a cordial meeting and there was a general consensus that some kind of opposition cooperation and unity should be worked at. Each party agreed that they would discuss the meeting with their respective CECs and invite the three of us (myself, Bentley and Kin Lian) to clarify our ideas before their committee before we

could move on to have the next meeting and have a definitive agenda to discuss more concrete things.

SDP’s CEC called us up first and after a thought-searching session, they said they would support a second meeting. NSP met us next. Though they had some misgivings, they were also in support of a second meeting.

We did not hear from SPP and when we called Mrs.Lina Chiam, she told us to wait until after their Annual General Meeting where a new CEC would be elected.

Subsequently, the Reform Party’s demands to join the SDA were Wickedly Leaked out and this had caused some internal problems within the SPP. Any talk of opposition unity received a stunning blow and Tan Kin Lian decided he did not want to be involved further.

Later when I met Tony Tan Lay Thiam of Reform Party over lunch, he fully supported such unity and cooperation idea and urged me to try again. Indeed, Tony may be a young politician but he can see a bigger picture than many more experienced ones.

However, this unsuccessful exercise was not a waste of time for me. From it, I gain a better insight to the people involved, or not involved, and it also reinforced my image of Mr. Chiam as a selfless politician.

I have known Mr. Chiam for twenty years. We first met when I wrote to the SDP, of which he was the then Secretary-General, to complain that they had not honoured my subscription to their newsletter, The Democrat. He immediately called me up to meet him for coffee. We met at the Pizza Hut in Jalan Jelita and he offered me his party membership straightaway. I told him that we had just met and how could he trust

me? But then, that is Mr Chiam. He has only one political opponent in his mind and everyone else could be his ally.

This attitude was to be reinforced again in 1997 at a Chinese New Year’s gathering hosted by him. I told him he needed to have a Barisan Nasional kind of arrangement amongst the political parties to fight the PAP. He immediately went to form the Singapore Democratic Alliance. In spite of misgivings by many others, he even invited the PKMS, a party that not many like to be associated with at that time, to join.

Unlike many political leaders, Mr. Chiam does not just pick people who think like him and exclude people whose views do not match his. Yes, this is Chiam. He has only one political opponent and everyone else is free to be his ally.

This is why I had no difficulty in getting him to agree to the meeting on the unity and cooperation of the various opposition political parties that Bentley and I had arranged.

He may have fallen out with his protégé Dr Chee Soon Juan for nearly twenty years. The painful scar still remains till today. Yet that has not prevented him from agreeing to sit down on the same table with the latter for the sake of opposition unity or saying “I agree with Dr Chee…” at the TOC’s Face-to-Face Forum.

Amongst the opposition political leaders, he is the only one I would consider a true statesman.

What then is my wish for the coming year? Below is the photograph I have taken this year. In the coming year, I just hope I have many more opportunities to take such photographs.

SDP's Dr Chee Soon Juan with SPP's Lina Chiam

The views expressed in this article is the author’s own.

This article is written for sgpolitics.net and theonlinecitizen.org. Please provide link to either website if you wish to re-publish the article.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Educate cyber citizens??

We must adapt ourselves to it, and use it to educate and…

Flashes of promise amid flashbacks

The following is an excerpt from Yawning Bread Alex Au/ Best shot…

【选举】李显扬发长文《品格与勇气》 质问是否仍要拥护行动党“天生贵族”机制?

前进党成员、建国总理李光耀次子李显扬,自宣布加入前进党后,经常公开呼吁人民支持在野党。尽管在此次大选中未参与任何的竞选,但在竞选期间亦频频现身前进党候选人的选区,以示对前进党的支持。 他亦于今早(5日)以中、英和马来文三语,发表长文声援前进党,除了赞许在野党候选人是为民发声的人,同时也比较在野党候选人与人民行动党候选人,指如今的国会已然成为官员谋取更高职位的垫脚石,非为人民发声之地,质问人民是否应该继续拥护人民行动党“天生贵族”的机制。 “这个大选年,新加坡涌现了许多可靠和能干的在野党选人。这群候选人不但有爱心,而且也很真实。他们拥有高尚的品格与资历。更重要的是,他们已全力以赴准备为新加坡国人,无畏地表达他们的需求。“ “与他们相反的,正正是苍白无色的PAP竞选人。对他们而言,国会只是谋取更高官职的垫脚石。纸上文凭和多年来的塑造粉饰,是否造就了更优秀或更强大的领袖?人民行动党(PAP)系统是否有助加强4G领袖的表现?我们是否还要继续拥护PAP的“天生贵族”机制?” 在野党的困境VS人民行动党的一帆风顺 李显扬也提及在野党候选人近年来所面对的困境,经常面对不公平对待与人格抹黑,甚至是亲友的打击,但他也表示,在野党候选人无所畏惧,因为他们关心的是国家的未来,因此相当佩服他们的勇气。 “相对于成为人民行动党(PAP)的候选人,成为反对党候选人需要品格和勇气,后者体现的是为国家牺牲的意愿。反对党候选人经常成为不公平对待、人格抹黑的受害者,而且也必须面对亲朋戚友的打击。然而,这些候选人选择站出来,为全民追求公正与平等。他们选择为人民发声,因为他们关心我们国家的未来。” 反观,他指出,人民行动党国会议员的政途一帆风顺,甚至可以进入内阁,或获得高薪职位。 “PAP国会议员的政途都一帆风顺,有者获得进入内阁、有者获得非常高薪的政治职位,而另一些则获颁董事职位及各种其它职位。” 李显扬:自己检查自己是行不通的 此外,他也阐述两者在国会上的立场,形容人民行动党,因党鞭(Party whip)的推动与对党的义务,加上各种回报,因此根据党的指示投票是意料中事,反观在野党会质疑一些不受欢迎的政策,并合理质询,避免出现滥权。他也提及各在野党候选人如前进党秘书长陈清木医生、工人党等。…

【冠状病毒19】8月21日新增117确诊 13入境病例

根据卫生部文告,截至本月21日中午12时,本地新增117例冠病19确诊,六例社区病例,新增13例入境病例。 其中六例社区病例,包括三名本地公民或永久居民,以及三名工作证件持有者,而13例入境病例则在入境我国后就开始履行居家通知。 至于其余新增病例都是隔离中的客工。 本地累计确诊已增至5万6216例。 当局仍在收集病例详情并将在今晚公布细节。