by Leong Sze Hian

I refer to the article “CPF Minimum Medisave Amount to be raised” (Today, Dec 23). It states that-

“From next month, the CPF Medisave Required Amount will be raised from the current $22,500 to $27,500. This is to enable members to have enough savings to meet their healthcare needs during old age”.

This is an increase of about 22 per cent. According to the CPF board’s web site

“after adjusting for inflation, the Required Amount (MRA) will increase by $2,500 (in 2003 dollars) each year until it reaches $25,000 (in 2003 dollars) on 1 January 2013”.

Since inflation for this year (2010), is only expected to be about 3.8 per cent, why is the MRA increase about 22 per cent (inclusive of the $2,500 increase)?

The year after the MRA was introduced on 1 January 2004, the increase was only from $2,500 to $5,100 on 1 January 2005.

Increasing the MRA now to $27,500 ($20,000 in 2003 dollars adjusted for inflation), means that the inflation adjustment for the last seven years is 37.5 per cent or 4.7 per cent per annum.

According to the Department of Statistics, inflation for the last seven years until November 2010, is about 17 per cent or about 2.3 per cent per annum.

Withdrawal rule reduced to 20%

What this MRA increase means is that for example, if a CPF account holder has $150,500 in his Ordinary and Special accounts but zero in his medisave account, he can only withdraw $24,600 (20 per cent withdrawal rule from 1 January, 2011 on current Minimum Sum (MS) of $123,000), at age 55, regardless of any MS property pledge.

At the current rate of annual increase in the MS and MRA totalling $11,000 a year (MS $6,000 plus MRA $5,000), when the MS withdrawal rule is phased out to zero in 2013, those who have less than $183,500 (current $150,500 plus $11,000 times 3 years), may not be able to withdraw anything at all at 55.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Singapore is no rush to be 'ahead of the curve' in adopting new technologies, say Transport Minister

Singapore is not in a rush to be “ahead of the curve”…

Dormitory operator locked migrant workers inside room as they were close contacts of a COVID-19 case

On Tuesday (21 April), migrant labour’s rights non-profit organisation Transient Workers Count…

读者批评宿舍经营者盈利颇丰 胜捷集团行政总裁强调重视客工福利

早前,《海峡时报》报导,近30万客工在疫情下,需遵守阻断措施待在宿舍,这也致使客工宿舍成本增加,政府将承担宿舍业者的额外成本。 对此,一名《海峡时报》读者唐立(译音),在本月21日发文,批评宿舍经营者理应自行承担额外开销。他认为,这些业者把宿舍空间能容纳的人数最大化,藉此获利颇丰。 新加坡巡回大使许通美教授也在4月初抨击,客工住在在过于拥挤的宿舍“如挤沙丁鱼”;媒体过去报导一些宿舍房间甚至容纳多达20人,这也不是新鲜事。 唐立提及,去年(截至2019年12月31日),胜捷集团取得1.33亿新元的营收,其中取得高达1亿0380万元的丰厚利润。对此他质问,如果我国的体制若允许业者透过上述方式盈利,那么是否也该由他们自行承担成本。 不过,胜捷集团行政总裁江志明随即在《海时》作出反驳,指业者仅仅靠把宿舍空间可容纳人数最大化,藉此获利的说法显得误导和偏驳。 他承认去年该集团确实取得1亿0380万元的利润,但这其中时包括第四季度一项高达6千630万元的一次性公允估值收益。 撇开上述一次性的收益,而该集团核心业务净利润达达3千820万元,这比较能体现该公司的业绩。其中42巴仙则包括新加坡以外的宿舍业务。 他也指出,在2019财年,客工宿舍的回报率为6.57巴仙。江志明也强调,该公司关注客工福利,包括确保客工宿舍宽敞、有设备齐全可自给自足的社区。 “每所宿舍都有健身房、室内和室外休闲设施、小型超市和食堂等。”他也表示,他们也准备一些正面的社区活动,如体育比赛、才艺表演、瑜伽、语言课等等。 他强调在疫情下业者仍继续协助客工住户、提供免费网络等,以满足他们心理和社交需求等。而疫情下也意味着该公司需作出调整,检讨宿舍的标准,但这都需要成本开销。 为此,他认为政府、雇主、宿舍经营者和广大社群对于成本的分摊应仔细考量。  …

何廷儒向选民说明 盛港市镇会交接工作进展

续选举结果尘埃落定一周后,盛港集选区候任议员何廷儒,在脸书向该区选民报备筹备市镇会进展。 她提及新划分的盛港集选区,需要寻求宏茂桥市镇会和白沙-榜鹅市镇会的协作,因目前该集选区仍属上述二市镇会的管辖范围。 何廷儒指出,当选工人党议员已联系国家发展部,表明有意自行管理盛港市镇会,预料将由她出任盛港市镇会主席。 她指出,在投票日隔日(11日),就已致函宏茂桥和白沙-榜鹅市镇会,希望能召开初步会议,讨论移交事宜。 7月15日,他们也要求尽快拿到管理代理服务合约的副本,以及市镇会管理软件。7月16日,与白沙-榜鹅市镇会召开线上会议,工人党候任议员也重复上述要求,以及希望能召开面对面会议,以进一步讨论交接事宜。 另一方面,何廷儒也指出一些盛港居民也曾致电向阿裕尼-后港市镇会反映区内问题,不过何廷儒指出,盛港的组屋社区事务,当前仍是由宏茂桥和白沙-榜鹅市镇会范围,若要反映社区民生问题或缴付杂费,仍暂时由上述市镇会处理,直至另行通知。 她表示在未来数周仍会继续更新交接工作的进展,也感谢选民们的耐心和支持。