by Leong Sze Hian

I refer to the article “CPF Minimum Medisave Amount to be raised” (Today, Dec 23). It states that-

“From next month, the CPF Medisave Required Amount will be raised from the current $22,500 to $27,500. This is to enable members to have enough savings to meet their healthcare needs during old age”.

This is an increase of about 22 per cent. According to the CPF board’s web site

“after adjusting for inflation, the Required Amount (MRA) will increase by $2,500 (in 2003 dollars) each year until it reaches $25,000 (in 2003 dollars) on 1 January 2013”.

Since inflation for this year (2010), is only expected to be about 3.8 per cent, why is the MRA increase about 22 per cent (inclusive of the $2,500 increase)?

The year after the MRA was introduced on 1 January 2004, the increase was only from $2,500 to $5,100 on 1 January 2005.

Increasing the MRA now to $27,500 ($20,000 in 2003 dollars adjusted for inflation), means that the inflation adjustment for the last seven years is 37.5 per cent or 4.7 per cent per annum.

According to the Department of Statistics, inflation for the last seven years until November 2010, is about 17 per cent or about 2.3 per cent per annum.

Withdrawal rule reduced to 20%

What this MRA increase means is that for example, if a CPF account holder has $150,500 in his Ordinary and Special accounts but zero in his medisave account, he can only withdraw $24,600 (20 per cent withdrawal rule from 1 January, 2011 on current Minimum Sum (MS) of $123,000), at age 55, regardless of any MS property pledge.

At the current rate of annual increase in the MS and MRA totalling $11,000 a year (MS $6,000 plus MRA $5,000), when the MS withdrawal rule is phased out to zero in 2013, those who have less than $183,500 (current $150,500 plus $11,000 times 3 years), may not be able to withdraw anything at all at 55.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Alex Au fined $8,000 for contempt of court, will appeal

Blogger Alex Au was fined $8,000 today, 5 March for contempt of court over…

女佣遭非法调派 2017-19年平均550投诉

前女佣巴蒂被指偷窃,终于在上周沉冤得雪。不过人力部指在2017年至2019年之间,当局年均接获550起女佣遭雇主或其家属非法调派的投诉! 其中76巴仙投诉,是由第三方揭发,其余则是由女佣本身提出。 据人力部昨日(9月8日)所发文告,每年因投诉而遭到当局对付的雇主平均有155人,每年有16名雇主接到3300元至2万4000元不等的罚款。 平均每年有80人接获警告(Caution Notice),以及60人接获劝告信函(Advisory Notice)。 劝告信函主要是给予没有明确证明女佣遭非法调派的雇主,而针对偶尔或短时间违法并被发现的雇主,当局会发出警告信,强烈提醒雇主若再犯将会面对执法行动对付。 “人力部认真看待每项指控,并对其进行调查。在大多数情况下,当我们和外籍女佣作进一步了解时,会发现他们和照顾人士(通常是儿童或老人家)都被安置在亲戚家,以便继续照顾他们。 只要外籍女佣接受有关安排,并且不要求他们执行两个家庭的家务活,还照顾到他们的福祉,那么人力部就允许这样做。” 当局也促请雇主们,为了避免不必要的误解或纠纷,应该和女佣们共同商定工作范围。 曾接获巴蒂投诉 此外,人力部也证实曾于2017年10月接到巴蒂的投诉,指在2016年9月至10月,以及2012年和2013年期间,她曾被非法调派到廖文良儿子的朱家河办公室工作。…

Has Tan Wu Meng confused fear and compulsion with diligence and discipline?

Singapore’s active courting of the North Korean state is somewhat disturbing. It…