by Leong Sze Hian

I refer to the article “No family will be left behind; with some help from CDC and Koufu” (Today, Dec 21).

Helping 2,000 needy students?

It states that:

Over the next two years, some 2,000 needy primary and secondary students will benefit from the fund of about $235,000, which is made up of Koufu’s donation of $117,558 – raised by staff as part of its corporate social responsibility efforts – and matched dollar for dollar by the CDC.

This works out to about $58.75 per needy student per year ($235,000 divided by 2,000 students), or about 16 cents per day ($58.75 divided by 365 days).

So, with regard to:

Yesterday, Madam Norhana’s children (5 of them) each received a kit of school essentials such as a new bag, book and vouchers for shoes. They will also get daily lunch allowances of $1 to $1.50”, based on the average of 16 cents per day per student calculated above, how many of the 2,000 students get all the items described?

Statistics that are narrated by describing one family, may be quite misleading. Because, clearly, there can’t be many getting the entire list of benefits.

How many helped by how much?

How many of the 2,000 needy students, received daily lunch allowances of $1 or $1.50 and for how long? How many received shoes vouchers, etc?

To illustrate why the sums may not seem right – if just 490 needy students get just a daily allowance of $1 (nobody getting more than $1 or $1.50), the entire $235,000 may already be used up ($235,000 divided by $6 times 80 weeks) – no money left for shoes vouchers, books, bags, stationery!

So, what we need is the break-down of how many received what, and how much did it cost?

Help long overdue?

As to “The CDC identified these students through working closely with the schools”, what was the CDC doing to help these 2,000 needy students in the past, or did it only identify them recently, when the $117,558 donation was available?

How many of these students went hungry, without shoes, stationary, bags, in the previous years?

Since the CDC were given funds to help the needy, why did it not help them in this respect, until now?

GST to help the poor?

When GST was raised from 5 to 7 per cent, it was said that it would fund programmes to help the poor, with an initial estimate of an extra $1.5 billion GST collections a year.

So, why is it that all the CDCs are doing so much to raise funds from the community and corporate sector?

Can we have an accounting of how the extra GST has been used to help the poor?

Without the answers to the above questions, perhaps what every media report about some new CDC fund raising scheme to help the poor, may only give the perception that they are not doing enough now and in the past.

Unless, CDCs do not get enough money to help the poor, such that only now, perhaps some needy students will not have to go hungry!

And what happens, when the $235,000 fund runs out in two years’ time?

Surely, CDCs have to budget and make a commitment to help the poor on a continuing on-going basis.

Are there any countries in the world that plan, budget, and account for welfare in the unique way which we seem to do?

Finally, if “no family will be left behind”, why are we seeing an increasing frequency of media reports, of families that are apparently only being helped more now?

NTUC Education Grant

NTUC informed a union member that her needy child could not qualify for the NTUC Education Grant, because she had not produced a results slip to show a passing grade.

It is hard enough to be poor, and as the statistics show more likely to not do well in school. So, why further de-moralise the child and his or her parents, by denying a grant which is only a one-time off $100 assistance. For this year, only 1,074 students received the Education Grant.

How many union member’s needy children were denied the grant because of their results?

Perhaps what needy children sorely need is more compassion, instead of motivation by denial –

“The National Trades Union Congress (NTUC) would like to clarify that the main objective of the NTUC GB Education Grant is to motivate members’ children who are currently schooling to continue to strive for academic excellence”. (Why NTUC requires results slip for education grant)

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

50岁情侣反锁家内扬言同归于尽 警破窗救援

一对50岁情侣在昨日(2日)将自己反锁在家内,并扬言要同归于尽,吓得邻居立即报警处理,而情侣双双在随后也被捕。 这对情侣将自己反锁在惹兰红山(Jalan Bukit Merah)第3组屋内,位于该组屋的第九层。 邻居指出,该名55岁男子与52岁女子已住在一起大约十年,男子无业,而女子则目前正就职清洁工。 案发当时男子正对着女子大吼,并扬言要挟同女子一同跳下楼。 而民防部队则向《新报》透露,大约晚间9点左右接获通报,于是便立即前往案发现场,并在底层放置缓冲气囊,阻止闹出人命。 随后等到灾难援助与救援队到来,并利用安全网从大楼到公寓的窗户击碎,再进入到屋内,对峙才得以停止。 警方发言人表示,该名男子涉嫌使用武力阻止公务员执行职务,而女子则涉嫌吸毒,目前双双已被逮捕,案件仍在侦办中。

搀扶跌倒老翁嘘寒问暖 女车长真心服务获赞扬

老翁在巴士上跌倒,女车长立刻趋前搀扶他到座位上,细心询问和检查,并帮忙揉淤青,暖心举止让现场见证的民众感动不已,网民更对这“真心”服务比大拇指。 身在现场的网友Vevin Mok于本月16日在脸书上分享有关事件,指一名老翁在新桥中心(New Bridge Centre)登上33号巴士时,不慎跌倒。 “巴士女车长立刻离席将老人家带到座位坐下,检查老翁是否有受伤,还帮忙揉淤青。她和老翁说话的语气温柔且开朗,就好像是和自己的父亲说话一样。” 网友对女车长的举止所感动,并呼吁网民给她一个赞,毕竟好事都要获得认可。 Vevin也在文中指出,33号巴士的路线不简单,因为会穿过有许多年长者乘车往返的旧住宅区和牛车水。 她表示,有些网友也分享了该女车长曾离席以协助年长者上巴士、帮忙拿包包和微笑问候乘客。“所以我见证的事情并不只发生一次,她的服务是发自真心的。” “女车长爱护年长者的暖心举止,真的是太棒了。如果我的父母登上由这些爱心司机驾驶的巴士,我也会更放心。” 网民呼吁传播正能量 新捷运随后也在脸书帖文指出,暖心女车长是该公司车长Lai…

MOF: Unfair to expect the suppliers to agree to unlimited changes

Ministry of Finance (MOF) agrees that it is unfair to expect the…

“RP is about returning power to the people!”

Lisa Li / photos by Kirsten Han Mr J.B Jeyaretnam was never…