Politics
SFD Human Rights march rejected (Updated)
Police has rejected a proposed protest march by the Singaporeans For Democracy (SFD) on Friday to mark International Human Rights Day. The proposed march was scheduled to start at 1pm at Hong Lim Park and would end at 1.45pm at the Parliament House less than 1km away.
In a press release by the SFD, it was stated that those marching would be “casually dressed (no standard attire)” and carrying 8 placards such as “Respect Freedom of Speech” and “Respect Freedom of Assembly”.
No reasons were given in the rejection letter from the Singapore Police Force (see below) but in a Straits Times report today, the police said that the application was turned down because of ‘law and order considerations’.
When contacted, filmmaker Martyn See, who made the application for the march, said that it didn’t make sense the police could allow 60,000 people to take part in a marathon but not 30 people for a walk.
If the size of the group does not appear to be a consideration for ‘law and order’, we are hazarding a guess that the rejection could be due to the inflammatory nature of the words on the placard. “Respect Freedom of Speech”, it appears, can drive bystanders and passers-by to acts of irrationality and violence.
“You may be well-behaving, but there may be other people whom you come across when you cycle who may stop you, may want to debate with you and that may attract a crowd, and therefore will result in problems the police want to avoid.”
– Senior Minister of State in the Ministry of Law and the Ministry of Home Affairs Ho Peng Kee in 2007, on why an application by the Worker’s Party to hold a cycling event for it’s 50th anniversary was rejected.
Nonetheless, SFD should take comfort that at least they are still allowed to march around Hong Lim Park, and in case of bad weather, in a hotel ballroom.
On 9th Dec 2010, SFD Executive Director James Gomez issued a press release asking for greater clarification of the reasons for rejecting the application and also asking for the results of the appeal to stage the march on another date:-
Cancellation of International Human Rights Day March
Singaporeans For Democracy (SFD) will cancel its scheduled march for 1pm from Speakers’ Corner to Parliament House on 10 Dec 2010 to commemorate International Human Rights Day. SFD has still not received the results of its appeal for a permit to march.
We appealed because no written reasons were provided by the Singapore Police Force (SPF) when denying SFD’s initial application for a permit to march. Please refer to their letter: https://www.theonlinecitizen.com/2010/12/sfd-protest-march-rejected/
We note that an SPF spokesperson cited “law and order considerations” to the media for denying SFD a permit to march on International Human Rights Day. We also note that media reports cited the SPF as advising the organiser to hold the event at Speakers’ Corner.
Speakers’ Corner is not a Marching Corner. Marches are symbolic, they travel from one point to another point and the choice of destinations have meaning. In this case, SFD wants to point out that human rights issues in Singapore are best resolved via changes in law that need to be made in Parliament. Thats why the end destination is important and that is why we chose Parliament.
The SPF should provide detailed reasons to the relevant applicant for any permit rejected. Stock answers such as “law and order considerations” are not helpful. Providing detailed reasons are important as the march circumstances for each application may be different. If reasons are provided in a timely manner then steps can be taken to ensure such “law and order considerations” are met in cases where an initial application is rejected. Without such clarifications, when permits are rejected, applicants are unable to re-design their march and successfully apply again for the relevant permit in a timely manner.
Because SFD has been denied a permit, it regrets its unable to lawfully march on International Human Rights Day.
Meanwhile, we at SFD are optimistic the Minister for Home Affairs will approve our appeal and that we can organise a march at the next opportune date.
Dr. James Gomez
Executive Director
Singaporeans For Democracy
On the same day, SFD received a latte from the Ministry of Home Affairs stating that its appeal has been rejected. The following is SFD’s response:-
Response to Appeal Outcome
We refer to the letter from Wai Cheng Theng (9 Dec 2010) on behalf of the Ministry of Home Affairs stating our appeal for a permit to March on International Human Rights Day cannnot be acceded to.
A blanket reason – that political and cause-related street processions/marches pose a higher security risk – is unsatisfactory if the risk assessment is not made known to the applicant.
SFD would like to know what is the nature of the security risk assessment, how it was done and who are the personnel involved. This information is important in order for us to re-design our March and to apply successfully for another permit.
SFD will be submitting a fresh application to organise another march with different specifications to ensure it is attracts a lower security risk premium.
Dr. James Gomez
Executive Director
Singaporeans For Democracy
Comments
LHL’s 15-minute visit to Dr Lee Wei Ling’s wake raises eyebrows among Singaporeans
On the evening of 10 October, Senior Minister Lee Hsien Loong and his wife, Ho Ching, attended Dr Lee Wei Ling’s wake, staying for about 10-15 minutes. This brief visit sparked online discussions about the custom of family members remaining throughout the day at funerals.
On Thursday evening (10 October), Singapore’s mainstream media, stationed outside Singapore Casket where Dr Lee Wei Ling’s wake was held, reported the arrival of Senior Minister Lee Hsien Loong and his wife, Ho Ching, to attend his sister’s funeral.
Dr Lee, the daughter of Singapore’s founding Prime Minister, Lee Kuan Yew, passed away on 9 October at the age of 69, at her family home at 38 Oxley Road.
Her wake is being held at Singapore Casket from 10 October to 12 October.
According to Lianhe Zaobao, SM Lee and Mdm Ho arrived outside Singapore Casket at around 8.30 pm.
They reportedly stayed at the wake for about 10 minutes and did not provide any comments to the media.
In contrast, the South China Morning Post reported that SM Lee and Mdm Ho stayed for approximately 15 minutes before leaving.
A member of the public who paid respects to Dr Lee shared with TOC that SM Lee had written a simple “RIP” in the condolences book.
Mr Li Yipeng, the eldest son of Senior Minister Lee Hsien Loong, also attended Dr Lee’s wake earlier.
Observing comments on social media, some users questioned the brevity of SM Lee’s visit to his sister’s wake.
One user remarked that even attending a friend’s funeral typically lasts at least 30 minutes, asking, “Where can you find a brother who attends his sister’s funeral for just 15 minutes?”
Others pointed out that it is customary for family members to stay the entire day at a funeral, particularly the eldest brother, who usually greets visitors and offers hospitality, such as refreshments.
“That’s what family members do,” one user noted.
A netizen lamented that instead of receiving guests at his sister’s wake, LHL appeared as a VIP guest accompanied by bodyguards.
Another user expressed sadness over the situation, noting that the eldest brother was attending the wake like any other outsider.
The comment highlighted that Lee Hsien Yang, the younger brother, was organizing the funeral remotely and could not return.
This led to a broader question among netizens: Would LHL attend his own brother’s funeral if he were to pass first?
Some netizens disagreed with the criticism of LHL’s attendance at his sister’s wake, arguing that, regardless of public sentiment towards the government, this is a personal matter.
One comment emphasised the need for objectivity, stating that people cannot judge LHL solely based on appearances or media reports.
He questioned what LHL might have done for his sister behind the scenes and pointed out that even if he had stayed longer, some would still find fault with his actions.
A comment on Reddit expressed that while LHL doesn’t necessarily need to be invited, his absence from receiving mourners as the eldest family member suggests he was not asked or instructed to participate in the funeral proceedings at all.
A netizen lamented that family disputes deeply affect one’s soul, particularly when reconciliation with a sibling is impossible, even in death.
The Reddit comment emphasised the emotional pain that arises from being reminded of happy childhood moments during such difficult times.
Comments
Netizens: Was Ho Ching smirking before entering Dr Lee Wei Ling’s funeral?
On 10 October at around 8.30 PM, Senior Minister Lee Hsien Loong and his wife, Ho Ching, were spotted arriving at Dr Lee Wei Ling’s funeral. While Singaporeans mourned Dr Lee’s passing, some netizens, after viewing media footage, questioned whether Mdm Ho was smirking before entering the funeral.
Dr Lee Wei Ling, the daughter of Singapore’s founding Prime Minister, Lee Kuan Yew, passed away on 9 October at the age of 69, at her family home at 38 Oxley Road.
Lee Hsien Yang (LHY), Dr Lee’s brother, announced her passing on social media, and had earlier requested that the wake and funeral remain a private affair.
He also noted that respects could be paid on a strict queue basis, adding, “There will be no exceptions, not even for VIPs,” to ensure that everyone is treated equally during the visitation period.
The wake is being held at the Pearl & Sapphire Hall of Singapore Casket, located at 131 Lavender Street, Singapore. Public visitation is open from 2 PM to 10 PM on 10 October, and from 10 AM to 10 PM on 11 October. The final visitation period is scheduled for 10 AM to 1 PM on 12 October.
Despite the request for privacy, mainstream media (MSM) representatives have gathered outside the Singapore Casket building.
MSM reporters are focused on whether Dr Lee’s elder brother, Senior Minister Lee Hsien Loong, will attend her funeral.
On Thursday (10 October ) at around 8.30pm, MSM spotted Senior Minister Lee and his wife, Ho Ching, entering Singapore Casket.
According to Lianhe Zaobao, SM Lee and his wife stayed at the wake for about 10 minutes and did not provide any comments to the media.
Comments on social media pages of various media outlets show Singaporeans pouring in with condolence messages, remembering Dr Lee’s contributions to Singapore’s medical field.
They praised her as a low-profile and modest woman, despite being a President’s Scholar and the Head of the Neurology Department.
Many noted how much she resembled her mother, who also shunned the limelight, even at their funerals.
However, some netizens, after viewing videos and photos taken by mainstream media, questioned whether Mdm Ho Ching was smirking before entering Dr Lee’s funeral.
Netizens Urge Media and Public to Give Grieving Family Space
Some netizens disagreed with the speculation surrounding Mdm Ho Ching’s expression in the media footage, urging others to refrain from making unfounded assumptions.
They called for compassion, emphasizing the need to give the grieving family some space.
Some netizens also recalled the Lee family feud surrounding the 38 Oxley Road house, where Dr Lee and LHY accused their brother, SM Lee, of opposing their father’s wish to have the house demolished after his passing.
One netizen lamented the strained relationship within the Lee family, questioning why there was supposed to be a sense of family, yet it felt more like guests attending the wake.
Another commented on the fact that SM Lee and his wife attended the wake rather than being involved in arranging it, especially given that Dr Lee was unmarried and their parents are no longer around, “it says alot about their relationship.”
One netizen speculated that Dr Lee might be SM Lee’s greatest regret in life, as he had failed to mend his relationship with her.
The comment added, “Attend or not attend his sister’s wake doesn’t really matter since the person had already gone.”
Meanwhile, some netizens questioned the media’s actions, pointing out that despite LHY’s request for no media coverage, reporters were still camping outside Dr Lee’s funeral.
-
Comments2 weeks ago
Netizens question Ho Ching’s praise for Chee Hong Tat’s return from overseas trip for EWL disruption
-
Singapore2 weeks ago
Lee Hsien Yang pays S$619,335 to Ministers Shanmugam and Balakrishnan in defamation suit to protect family home
-
Singapore2 weeks ago
Train services between Jurong East and Buona Vista to remain disrupted until 1 Oct due to new cracks on East-West Line
-
Comments1 week ago
Netizens push back on Ho Ching’s 8-10 million population vision and call for more foreigners
-
Singapore2 weeks ago
Commuters face service disruption on TEL due to train fault following 6-day EWL disruption
-
Comments1 week ago
Dr Chee Soon Juan criticises Ho Ching’s vision for 8-10 million population
-
Singapore1 week ago
PM Lawrence Wong reaffirms government’s commitment to integrity after ex-minister Iswaran’s jail sentence
-
Opinion2 weeks ago
SMRT privatization: Shielding information or strategic restructuring?