Between Nov 15, and Nov 16, Today and Channel Newsasia -both owned by Mediacorp –  posted the same article by Sara Grosse online, under slightly different headlines. (‘ComCare applications decrease this year‘ – CNA Nov 15  and ‘Fewer need assistance from Comcare as economy improves‘ – Today Nov 16)

Nothing out of the ordinary, it would seem, as we all know that it is editors, not writers who decide on the headlines, and we can assume that both websites would have different editors.

Channel Newsasia, Nov 15
Today Online, Nov 16

However, upon closer look, one notices that there is more than just the headlines of the articles which are different. In the Channel Newsasia version, it is written that the ‘maximum duration of assistance given” under the Comcare fund is “three months”.

Channel Newsasia's version

Interestingly, in the Today online version of the same article, posted on Nov 16, the highlighted sentence is missing!

Today Online's version

Considering that Channel Newsasia Online actually has a higher readership than Today Online, it does appear strange that the editor for the Today Online version deemed it necessary to tweak the sentence.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

We deliver “exceptional value to the public” – SMRT

Internationally, SMRT is reputed for consistently delivering exceptional value to the public…

Govt grants for town councils: PAP vs Opposition

From the Straits Times, 03 July 2010. [Click picture to enlarge.] “The…

Rony sticks to his guns

He stuck to his guns, made no apology for what he said,…

No honour in SAF’s handling of dog abuse case, says NSF's father

The father of the full-time National Serviceman (NSF) who took a video…