Dear editor,

I am a regular reader of TOC. I felt compelled to write the following response after reading the justification given by the Nobel Committee which was posted on the website a few days ago. [See here: “Why we gave Liu Xiaobo a Nobel”]

I support the Chinese government’s stance. I think they have every right to protest. Such a decision (to award Liu) is inherently political since it is made by a very exclusive group of politicians that presumably share very similar outlooks on what “fundamental human rights” should be.

How can such notions of human rights be considered universal if they are only championed by the West? Fundamentally, I do not see a difference between the Pentagon’s condemnation of the Wikileaks releases and China’s censorship of “sensitive” materials such as Charter 08. It shows that there is always a limit to the freedom of information when an issue is deemed subversive to certain national interests. Since it is reasonable to expect that what constitutes national interests is different for every country, then there is no basis for such “universal” standards to be applied.

I am not against human rights. I am against the imposition of the standards of a small minority to the world, possibly with political agendas.

If we take an extreme and perverse example, suppose China decided to give an award to Osama Bin Laden for his promotion of democracy in the world by giving a voice to the impoverished masses who have suffered under decades of American intervention in the Middle East. Would this be acceptable?

No one in the right frame of mind would even consider that, much less seriously make such a suggestion. Which is exactly the point that the West needs to stop placing itself on a pedestal and consider the diversity of values in the world (especially in the area of political rights) if we want to seriously talk about any form of universality.

I know it is not much, but I would really appreciate it if you would take the time to consider the article for publishing.

Thank you.
Regards,
James Min Zhang

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

涉袭击性侵女大学生 印度客工被控严重强奸

一名客工涉及在克兰芝袭击和强奸一名女大学生,将于下个月出庭,面临严重强奸(aggravated rape)指控。 根《联合早报》报导,被告是21岁,来自印度的Chinnaiah Karthik。据称,他于5月4日凌晨1时30分左右,在赛马公会道(Turf Club Avenue)沿途遇见受害者。 受害者为一名23岁的在籍大学生。目前尚不清楚受害者当时是在慢跑,或是回家途中,也不清楚被告是否一早就预谋好这宗强奸袭击案。 报导指出,受害者遭到袭击时曾尝试自保,高声呼救,并且和被告展开激烈挣扎,但是遭被告暴力以对,将她制服了。 据报告和法庭文件,被告随后将受害者拖入赛马公会和克兰芝战争纪念馆附近的丛林中,强奸受害者。受害者不甘被性侵,随后还展开顽强反抗。被告被惹怒后将受害者打伤。 警方在展开调查后,透过该地区,包括设置在邻近附近灯柱的摄像机,所记录的监控录像,成功识别被告。 警方随后在被告的宿舍伏击,于次日成功将被告逮捕归案。被告目前尚被还押,并且接受调查。 被告已于5月7日被起诉,预计将于6月3日在高等法院开审。被告被控严重强奸,即他为了成功性侵,蓄意伤害或威胁受害者。…

British politicians have been asked to sever ties with Singaporean pastor who regards homosexuality a ‘sin’

In 2013, Senior Pastor and Co-Founder of Cornerstone Community Church (CCC), Yang…

Public consumption of liquor to be restricted

If the new Liquor Control (Supply and Consumption) Bill is passed in…