Dear editor,

I am a regular reader of TOC. I felt compelled to write the following response after reading the justification given by the Nobel Committee which was posted on the website a few days ago. [See here: “Why we gave Liu Xiaobo a Nobel”]

I support the Chinese government’s stance. I think they have every right to protest. Such a decision (to award Liu) is inherently political since it is made by a very exclusive group of politicians that presumably share very similar outlooks on what “fundamental human rights” should be.

How can such notions of human rights be considered universal if they are only championed by the West? Fundamentally, I do not see a difference between the Pentagon’s condemnation of the Wikileaks releases and China’s censorship of “sensitive” materials such as Charter 08. It shows that there is always a limit to the freedom of information when an issue is deemed subversive to certain national interests. Since it is reasonable to expect that what constitutes national interests is different for every country, then there is no basis for such “universal” standards to be applied.

I am not against human rights. I am against the imposition of the standards of a small minority to the world, possibly with political agendas.

If we take an extreme and perverse example, suppose China decided to give an award to Osama Bin Laden for his promotion of democracy in the world by giving a voice to the impoverished masses who have suffered under decades of American intervention in the Middle East. Would this be acceptable?

No one in the right frame of mind would even consider that, much less seriously make such a suggestion. Which is exactly the point that the West needs to stop placing itself on a pedestal and consider the diversity of values in the world (especially in the area of political rights) if we want to seriously talk about any form of universality.

I know it is not much, but I would really appreciate it if you would take the time to consider the article for publishing.

Thank you.
Regards,
James Min Zhang

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

NTUC Foodfare imposes more than $2k ancillary charges on top of $1.6k rental on hawkers

Last week (28 Aug), Makansutra food guru KF Seetoh published a write-up…

“脱口罩才说话!” 侮辱商场职员、涉袭警 妇女被捕

妇女拒绝戴口罩,还与商场工作人员起争执,以及涉嫌袭警,有关妇女已被捕并在今日(9日)被控上庭。 本月7日,一名妇女因戴口罩问题,在三巴旺太阳广场(Sun Plaza)与工作人员起争执。她声称工作人员戴上口罩说话,她听不清楚,要求对方脱下口罩才说话。 尽管工作人员多次劝诫,对方仍不配合;后来警员接到投报到场,警方要求妇女拿出身份证,对方仍不肯合作,还将身份证上的地址标签撕掉。 另一名警察试图阻止却遭袭击。该名妇女因涉嫌蓄意伤害执勤公务员,可能触犯刑事法典第332节条文。一旦罪成可面对最高七年监禁、罚款或鞭刑。 此外,防止骚然法令下,使用侮辱性语言骚扰他人,可判处最高半年监禁、5千元罚款或两者兼施。 至于拒绝戴口罩,警方则在冠状病毒疾病(临时措施)法令下调查妇女。

COVID-19 highlights the thinness of Singapore's social protection for the underprivileged, says Yeoh Lam Keong

On Saturday, the Workers’ Party (WP) Youth Wing organised an online Zoom…