Community
VegVibe – a platform for green advocates
– By Stephanie Chok –
The time is ripe for VegVibe, a bi-monthly magazine covering “anything and everything that is vegetarian and vegan”. Launched as an online magazine in August 2009, the magazine ran as a monthly publication till its first print issue was launched a year later, in August 2010.
Helmed by husband and wife team, Gangasudhan, 34 (Managing Editor) and Halimah Illavarasi, 30 (Creative Director), VegVibe is filled with delicious recipes and nutritional advice, but its aspirations go beyond enticing meat-eaters to swop steaks for soy – the free (and “it will always be free”) publication wants to serve as a uniting platform for vegetarians, environmentalists and animal welfare advocates.
TOC catches up with multitasking greenie on a mission, Ganga, to find out more.
TOC: How would you describe VegVibe?
Ganga: VegVibe is a magazine that discusses aspects of vegetarianism, veganism, environmentalism, health & nutrition and animal welfare. The magazine aims to reach out to anyone and everyone – from the skeptic to the diehard, because we work to educate by providing justifiable fact rather than empty evangelism; we don’t need people to change but to think about their actions. We provide information that facilitates readers to reflect and trust them to make the best decisions – for the planet and the sentient beings on it.
TOC: When did the idea of starting VegVibe begin? Could you share some key turning points?
Ganga: Halimah and I turned vegetarian in May 2008 and when we wanted more information, we had to trawl the Internet and weed out the facts. Around January 2009, we realised that the local community really needed a point of reference to learn more. We decided to release a simple online magazine as a contribution (not as a business) and as we developed the material for our magazine, we noticed that environmentalists and animal activists were not as involved as they could be with the vegetarian community. We decided we should use our position to unite environmentalists, animal activists and vegetarians and try to facilitate efficiency in the overarching movement of doing good.
The response was incredible from the get-go and we were encouraged to move into print so that we could reach out to more people. Also, using a print medium, we found that we could attract advertising dollars as well and keep VegVibe sustainable. [1]
TOC: You speak of the desire to integrate environmentalists, people involved in animal rights and the health-conscious. Why is this integration important, and how does VegVibe intend to contribute to this?
Ganga: In today’s context, there is little difference between the various movements but they still continue to come up with initiatives separately – sometimes repeating the same approaches on overlapping areas. We hope to streamline the movements so we can have major initiatives that are efficient, focused and highly effective.
On a more tangible note, consolidation will lead to better funding since businesses would no longer have to ‘shop’ for the best group/organisation to support and can come in strongly at a single point of contact. [2]
TOC: What about the relationship between “green” (environmental) and “red” (social justice) issues?
Ganga: Perhaps, once we can consolidate the green movement, all of us would be better organised to lend more support to social justice initiatives? I think the world is too complicated for all of us to fight all the battles all the time, so we have decided to focus on something achievable within our lifetime.
Thinking about it further, it could very well be the stepping stone to inspire the social justice movement to emulate what VegVibe advocates – consolidation for better efficiency and results. Besides, once we can all take care of the non-human creatures on Earth together, I am convinced that it would pave the way for all of us to take care of one another!
TOC: Why did you become a vegetarian?
Ganga: We turned vegetarian on 2nd May 2008 (a day after our wedding anniversary) because we didn’t want to eat unhealthily any more. While we were not big meat eaters to begin with, we wanted to stop the processed food like nuggets, burgers, sausages and hotdogs that had become a routine part of our (busy) lives. So we decided that turning vegetarian would give us that demarcation and discipline. But as we learnt more about nutrition, we were convinced by the ethical arguments and became ethical vegetarians. Since January 2010, we moved towards a vegan lifestyle (a lifestyle that is cruelty-free) and do not consume or use anything that has led another creature to suffer in any way (or be inconvenienced even). We don’t believe that anyone can claim to be vegan in an urban environment (since almost everything is processed and manufactured and one cannot ascertain the raw ingredients).
TOC: Do you run VegVibe full-time?
Ganga: Not really. Both Halimah and I are trainers – she does culinary training, tutoring (she was a former teacher) and is doing her Masters in education at NIE, whilst I do language, correspondence and creative writing coaching/workshops. But it looks like I will take on VegVibe full-time and if we continue to grow, then it will be a matter of time before Halimah does it full-time as well.
TOC: Who does what in VegVibe – could you introduce your team? (Including some of the regular contributors)
Ganga: Basically it is a two-person operation with research and content directed by Halimah and both of us doing the writing; I do the editing, design and layout. We get the magazine printed in Johor Bahru and (painfully) handle the distribution ourselves. Some of the regular writers include, Luke Otter – a vegetarian food blogger, Bhavani Prakash – an inspiring environmentalist, Trina Tan – an eco-living activist, Janice Tan – a vegetarian food expert, and Eugene Tan – a green initiatives expert.
TOC: What are some of the challenges you faced in the beginning?
Ganga: No real challenges since it is driven by passion and we have no competition. Businesses appreciate our publication because it offers a very targeted medium for advertising, whilst our style is inoffensive and readers can choose the information they want to accept or reject. We have been blessed by a host of people who are ever-willing to help us in terms of content, presence, ideas and even sponsorship.
TOC: What are the rewards of running/publishing VegVibe?
Ganga: Satisfaction in how we are helping people and the community at large. We have been reaching people who would be typically turned off by the word ‘vegetarianism’ and that has been a great achievement. It is great to see each issue being read by strangers, pointing to and discussing the things they see in our pages.
TOC: Were there particular stories that received the most feedback/responses?
Ganga: Mostly, the recipes receive a good response because (I think) there are no real recipes customised for Singaporeans easily available. Other than this, stories on animal welfare get emotional responses (since it would naturally be close to the heart for some) and our opinion pieces get others sharing their own similar experiences. In essence, we believe we are achieving our goal of having something for everyone, so we do believe that at least one article will strike a chord with at least 75% of our readers.
TOC: Have you received feedback from non-vegetarians? If so, could you share some?
Ganga: Since we are not trying to convince anyone, the best measure of non-vegetarians’ reception of VegVibe will be the criticisms! We have observed that much of the material put forth on vegetarianism receives attacks, condemnation and disgust – and we have intentionally created content that will not provoke this sort of reaction. Non-vegetarians are never told they are wrong and they are never judged by VegVibe – we wholeheartedly accept that everyone has a good reason for their choices (be it vegetarian or meat-consumption). We provide solid information so that readers can always reflect on their choices. If after considering the facts, they do not feel the need to make any changes to their lifestyle, it is perfectly fine. In that regard, rational non-vegetarians never have anything bad to say. In the past year, the number of (crazy) confrontational meat-eaters who have wanted to pick a fight for the sake of it has been less than 3.
TOC: There seems to be a growing surge of interest in vegetarianism and environmental issues in general. Have you seen this interest translate into concrete action and changes in the way we live?
Ganga: Definitely! Not only a shift towards vegetarianism and awareness of the need for individual action in ensuring the environment doesn’t fall apart, but also the recognition that vegetarianism and environmentalism are intertwined. The tangible consequence has been that a publication like VegVibe doesn’t even have to try. By just presenting the solid facts without exaggeration, people automatically understand the need to do something at the individual level and they just start doing the necessary in their respective lives.
TOC: What is your opinion of current mainstream media portrayals of vegetarians and vegetarianism?
Ganga: It is no longer the portrayal of ‘an alternative lifestyle’ but that of proactive practices. It has changed and instead of the ‘different’ angle, it is now the ‘better living’ angle.
TOC: What are some stubborn stereotypes of vegetarians and why do you think they persist?
Ganga: The ‘lack of nutrition’ misconception remains the stubborn dirt that fades and never gets removed completely, and also the part that gets dirty again the quickest. It is probably because the generation that saw meat as an essential part of daily consumption (especially war-time folk) is still around. The problem with this misconception is that it is easy to ‘prove’ – if we look at the typical supermarket, it is hard to find a one-to-one replacement or alternative for the protein-filled meat products that line the shelves. Stuff like quinoa is hard to find (and even harder to explain and describe) and it becomes an academic exercise to dismiss a vegetarian diet as lacking in nutrition.
This is changing though and by the time our generation reaches old age, this misconception will become outdated, just like the argument that ‘vegetarian food is boring’ is today no longer be a valid point.
TOC: What are some of your favourite eating spots in Singapore?
Ganga: Halimah and I love Eight Treasures Vegetarian Restaurant, VeganBurg, Vege Sensation and a stall at a coffeeshop at Blk 630 Ang Mo Kio Avenue 4 that is open 24 hours.
TOC: What is your long-term vision for VegVibe?
Ganga: We are still growing and with each passing day we meet a different person who can offer us yet another opportunity. It is possible that we may become a think-tank, contributing to the knowledge and expertise on the topics of vegetarianism, veganism, environmentalism, health & nutrition and animal welfare, as well as organising initiatives and facilitating collaboration among the stakeholders. We might also move into providing for the community as several manufacturers overseas have approached us to help distribute their products in the local market. But whatever it is, VegVibe will continue to exist in perpetuity since it does not cost us much and we enjoy preparing each issue. We also believe that each issue makes an impact on at least one person – and that is justification enough for us.
__________________________________________
[1] You can learn more by watching the welcome address Ganga gave during VegVibe’s launch event at http://vimeo.com/14882074
[2] The paper that Ganga presented at the World Vegetarian Congress 2010 on this issue – We Are More Alike Than You Think – is available online here
______________________________________________________
A bi-monthly magazine, VegVibe will be released every odd month. Print copies will be available at partner locations comprising green and animal-welfare organisations, as well as organic stores and vegetarian eating establishments – a list is updated here.
To find out more, visit VegVibe’s website at www.vegvibe.com or join the official VegVibe Facebook page
Community
Pro-Palestine residents call for sanctions against Israel during meet-the-people session in Punggol-West
Pro-Palestinian supporters from Punggol West engaged MP Sun Xueling at a Meet-the-People Session, urging Singapore to consider sanctions against Israel amid the ongoing crisis that has claimed at least 42,000 Palestinian lives. While Sun highlighted Singapore’s S$17 million in humanitarian aid, residents questioned the effectiveness of aid given the country’s arms trade with Israel.
SINGAPORE: Marking one year since the Israeli assault on Palestine that claimed over 42,000 lives, on 7 October 2024, pro-Palestinian supporters from Punggol West gathered at a Meet-the-People Session to discuss sanctions against Israel with MP Sun Xueling.
Ms Sun highlighted Singapore’s humanitarian efforts, noting that over S$17 million (approximately US$13 million) had been directed to the region. She called the crisis a “huge human catastrophe” and advocated for an immediate ceasefire.
However, residents questioned the feasibility of a ceasefire given Singapore’s ongoing arms trade with Israel, citing the purchase of Blue Spear missiles for the Navy and the display of Israeli weapons at the Singapore Air Show. They also pointed out that Israeli defense company Elbit Systems operates in Singapore.
Although Ms Sun was not involved in arms discussions, she promised to raise these concerns with the relevant ministries.
On 2 July 2024, Mr Leong Mun Wai, Non-Constituency Member of Parliament (NCMP) from the Progress Singapore Party, asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs whether Singapore had sold any defence materials to Israel since the conflict began on 7 October 2023.
Minister Dr Vivian Balakrishnan responded that Singapore strictly adheres to international arms sales obligations and submits regular reports to the UN, but does not disclose specifics due to national security reasons. It should be noted that there is no embargo on arms sales to Israel.
On 18 September 2024, Singapore voted in favour of UN General Assembly Resolution A/ES-10/L.31, which called for a halt to imports from Israeli settlements and arms provisions to Israel in situations where they might be used in the Occupied Palestinian Territory. Following this, NCMP Leong filed a question regarding whether Singapore would implement the resolution’s steps.
The session shifted to concerns about a broader conflict, with residents referencing Israel’s ground invasion of Lebanon and Syria and questioning whether sanctions were being considered.
Ms Sun acknowledged their fears and affirmed that the crisis in Gaza was unacceptable.
When asked about sanctions, she explained that the Israel-Palestine conflict is more complex than other international issues, such as the Russia-Ukraine war, but assured residents she would relay their concerns to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA).
Residents pressed further, questioning whether Israel’s invasion of Lebanon justified sanctions and expressing frustration about a perceived double standard in how invasions in the Middle East are treated compared to those involving predominantly white countries.
Ms Sun noted that Singapore had previously imposed sanctions in other contexts, such as during the US invasion of Grenada and Vietnam’s incursion into Cambodia, emphasizing that sanctions are not determined by ethnicity.
They also pointed out the inconsistency in Singapore’s approach, highlighting that the country only established diplomatic ties with South Africa after the end of apartheid.
Ms Sun admitted her limited knowledge of this history but promised to raise these examples with the MFA.
The session concluded with residents submitting a petition urging the government to impose sanctions on Israel.
Netizens criticize Singapore’s stance on Israel
Under a post by Monday of Palestine Solidarity on Instagram, netizens voiced their opinions on the recent dialogue between Punggol West residents and MP Sun Xueling regarding Singapore’s stance on Israel.
One user questioned Ms Sun’s knowledge of the situation in Palestine, asking, “Is she even aware of what’s happening at all?”
They argued that while Ms Sun claimed the scale of the conflict was different from the Russia-Ukraine war, the situation in Palestine is actually far worse.
The user criticized her for not using accurate terms to describe the crisis, suggesting she was avoiding terms like “mass murder,” “apartheid,” “genocide,” and “ethnic extermination.”
The commenter also pointed out historical context, referencing a New York Times article from June 20, 1899, titled “Conference of Zionists in Baltimore: Will Colonize Palestine,” to emphasize the long-standing nature of the issue.
They concluded by stating, “Humanitarian aid does NOT stop the killing,” highlighting the need for stronger action.
Another user expressed frustration, calling the government’s response “absolutely unacceptable.”
They criticized Singapore for being one of the top exporters of weapons, which are “being used and tested on Palestinians,” while only offering humanitarian aid and failing to take meaningful action against Israel.
One commenter highlighted the disparity in Singapore’s response, noting that the government had immediately sanctioned Russia when the war in Ukraine began, yet after a year of violence in Palestine, no similar action had been taken against Israel.
Another user challenged the common narrative that the Israel-Palestine conflict is an ancient issue that spans thousands of years, calling it a “lazy excuse for inaction.”
They stressed that Israel has been in violation of international law since its illegal occupation of Palestine and the establishment of apartheid in 1967.
Some users expressed skepticism about Singapore’s ability to take a stronger stance. One commenter argued that Singapore depends on its Zionist allies for security, stating that any action against Israel could jeopardize the country’s safety.
They pointed to the historical ties between Singapore and Israel, particularly in building Singapore’s military, and concluded that speaking out against Israel would endanger Singapore’s security and stability.
Community
IMDA to probe Singtel’s island-wide landline outage of 8 October
The Infocomm Media Development Authority (IMDA) is investigating Singtel’s island-wide landline outage on 8 October, emphasising its commitment to thoroughly examining any public telecommunications service interruption. A Singtel spokesperson described the outage as an “isolated incident,” adding that there is “no evidence to suggest it is a cyber-related event.”
On 8 October 2024, a significant landline outage affected Singtel customers across the island.
According to Lianhe Zaobao, the Infocomm Media Development Authority (IMDA) stated that it takes any public telecommunications service interruption seriously and will investigate the incident thoroughly.
In a Facebook update at 8:25 PM on the same day, Singtel announced that its fixed voice services had been fully restored.
The telecommunications provider expressed its apologies for the disruption and the inconvenience caused to customers.
Earlier, the disruption also impacted emergency call services, affecting both the Singapore Civil Defence Force (SCDF) and the Singapore Police Force (SPF).
Members of the public experiencing difficulties reaching emergency numbers 995 or 999 were advised to send an SMS to SCDF at 70995 or SPF at 70999.
Both SPF and SCDF later reported on 7PM that the earlier disruption affecting the 995 and 999 emergency hotlines has been resolved.
The authorities assured the public that they could resume using these hotlines for emergencies and expressed gratitude for the public’s understanding during the outage.
Earlier that day, around noon, multiple users reported difficulties making calls through landlines on Singtel’s official Facebook page and X (formerly Twitter), including problems with office lines.
A check on Downdetector revealed a surge in outage reports for Singtel beginning around 2 PM, peaking at 2,781 complaints. By 5 PM, the number of reports had decreased to over 500.
According to the feedback on Downdetector, most of the problems faced by users pertain to landlines, which matches the responses from netizens on social media platforms.
Major institutions were also affected by the outage. KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital (KKH), the National Cancer Centre, and Changi General Hospital (CGH), all under SingHealth, alerted the public to the disruption.
By approximately 6:30 PM, all three institutions confirmed that their telephone services had been restored.
Additionally, Singapore’s three local banks—DBS, UOB, and OCBC—reported similar issues with their customer service hotlines during the outage.
According to CNA, a spokesperson from Singtel described the outage as an “isolated incident” and stated that there is “no evidence to suggest it is a cyber-related event.”
-
Comments2 weeks ago
Netizens question Ho Ching’s praise for Chee Hong Tat’s return from overseas trip for EWL disruption
-
Comments2 weeks ago
Netizens push back on Ho Ching’s 8-10 million population vision and call for more foreigners
-
Singapore2 weeks ago
Commuters face service disruption on TEL due to train fault following 6-day EWL disruption
-
Comments2 weeks ago
Dr Chee Soon Juan criticises Ho Ching’s vision for 8-10 million population
-
Singapore1 week ago
PM Lawrence Wong reaffirms government’s commitment to integrity after ex-minister Iswaran’s jail sentence
-
Singapore4 days ago
Media presence at Lee Wei Ling’s funeral contradicts family’s request for privacy
-
Comments2 weeks ago
Netizens express skepticism over Ho Ching’s story of reluctance to accept Temasek CEO role
-
Comments3 days ago
LHL’s 15-minute visit to Dr Lee Wei Ling’s wake raises eyebrows among Singaporeans