By Leong Sze Hian

I refer to the article “Govt Payouts a grey area for nursing homes” (ST, Aug 23).

http://www.cpf.gov.sg/imsavvy/infohub_article.asp?readid={734381012-6184-4790874719}&print=1

I think for a destitute and penniless person, it may be a blow to their well being, if we deny them of even these “once in a long time” luxury. The purpose of such periodic Government payouts as I understand it, is to reward senior citizens who have contributed to Singapore’s success, by way of payouts like the GST credits.

Whilst I appreciate the fact that some nursing homes are short of funds in providing their excellent social services of housing and caring for the elderly poor, it is no excuse for not even getting the consent of nursing home residents to use their Government payouts to fund their stay.

For those who are of unsound mind, such as those with dementia, I agree that this practice may perhaps be acceptable.

Now that the Auditor-General’s Office (AGO) has flagged this practice, what are the Government agencies with oversight on nursing homes going to do about it?

I would also like to point out that the arrangement to allow intermediate and long-term care proxies to cash home residents’ cheques if they are unable to do so, should not be construed as the right to use their Government payouts.

In this connection, why is it that although the Ministry of Finance (MOF) said its guidelines made it clear that the payouts belong to the patients, it also declined to give a copy to the Straits Times?

I am also disturbed by the reason given by two homes that at briefings held by the authorities, they had been given the impression that they could use the payouts to defray the cost of caring for such patients. In my view, the reason given that some patients were not fully subsidised by the Government and had to be supported by the organisation’s funds coming from public donations, is irrelevant to the issue.

In this context, I fully concur with those nursing homes who said that they do not use the money because it would not be proper.

Finally, whilst I do not concur that homes should be penalized for using such monies in the past, they should at least be given clear guidelines now that such practices should not be allowed to continue.

So far, the silence by the authorities on this issue, is I must say, at best, not “golden” and quite puzzling!

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

不满没收到补助劵 男子怒偷60张,用剩烧给亡妻!

男子未收到任何必需品补助券(Grocery Vouchers),竟偷了60张原本发放给受疫情影响的所需人士,剩下的烧给给已过世妻子,他为此面对涉嫌盗窃罪,被判4周监禁。 47岁被告刘春发(译音,Alvin Law Choon Huat)涉嫌两项偷盗罪。对此,被告已认罪,另两项则交由法官下判时考量。 案情显示,被告于去年10月在社交媒体上得知居住在一房式和二房式组屋,且拥有不超过一个房产的困难人士,将得到由政府派发的必需品补助券。 被告随后便到自家邮箱查看,但却未看到任何补助券,因而感到失落。为了能掌握补助劵是否已派发,他便前往马林台(Marine Terrace)第51座组屋内查看别人家的邮箱。 他从一些没有盖好或开口损坏的邮箱中发现补助劵已派发出去,让他感到愤愤不平,一气之下从中偷走四名受害者已被密封的信封,每封信封内共有15张补助劵,每张补助劵价值10元。 然而,在他偷走补助劵后的几天,他自己却收到了属于自己的补助劵。他并未及时将补助劵归还,而是将它们用于职总平价市场和Giant购买杂货,还购买了一架吸尘器。 把剩下补助券当祭品烧给亡妻…

Sri Lanka to postpone general election due to COVID-19 outbreak

Sri Lanka’s election commission on Thu (19 Mar) announced the postponement of…

Withdrawing his candidacy does not make Ivan Lim into some sort of self sacrificial martyr

With controversial Peoples’ Action Party (PAP) candidate Ivan Lim withdrawing from the…

Acknowledging public confidence hurt by recent incidents, PM Lee urges public to support Khaw Boon Wan and his team

Speaking at the People’s Action Party (PAP) convention held on Sunday (19 Nov)…