Connect with us

Current Affairs

James Gomez on political future: “I don’t back down in a fight”

Published

on

By Deborah Choo

TOC recently caught up with local civil society activist and perennial politician Dr James Gomez, a perennial force in Singaporean politics for over a decade. In this exclusive interview, Dr Gomez gives TOC readers a sneak peek into what kind of political party he sees himself fitting into, what he sees as the key issues of the upcoming elections, and his new role as Executive Director of Singaporeans for Democracy.

Dr Gomez ran with the Worker’s Party “A team” in Aljunied GRC at the 2006 General Elections and is now Deputy Associate Dean (International) and Head of Public Relations at Monash University’s School of Humanities, Communications and Social Science.

How did you get first get involved in politics? Was your family politically inclined (e.g. dinner-table conversations about politics), did you get inspired by an issue or person when at university that brought you to politics?

I have been asked this questions several times and it always take me my National University days in the late 1980s. One incident comes to mind and this was during the Tiannamen Square student massacre. Several others and I, this was the days before the internet, organized a petition signing on campus and tried to get other students involved. However, I was surprised how frightened some students were to sign the petition. Instead they disapproved of us organisng the petition. I knew then something was wrong in Singapore if the attempt to speak up against an injustice was frowned upon. Yet at the same time there was fair support from others about our petition. So I decided then, I will henceforth start speaking up on issues that matter to Singaporeans. And support for that has grown very well over the years.

Why the opposition? Did you ever consider joining the PAP to “change things from the inside?”

I am interested in regime change not “change things from the inside” as I believe there is something fundamentally wrong with the PAP style of governance and that it is increasingly not suitable for modern day Singapore. So when I decided to get serious about politics I began using two platforms – civil society and opposition party. In the changing world of the political party as an institution and the movement of people from civil society to politics we need to think outside the box to be effective in politics. I find the mixed civil society-political party approach as being more potent in effecting regime change. Over the last ten years this has been my strategy for political engagement.

Tell us about Singaporeans for Democracy. Why did you start it and where do you envision it going?

Singaporeans for Democracy under local laws is a political association and prevented only from standing for elections as an organisation. It is essentially a collection of individuals who bring to the SFD platform their own networks and resources. Recently we submitted a report to the UN Special Rapporter on Racism, tomorrow we are organizing a public consultation on electoral reforms after which we will submit a report to the UN Universal Periodic Review process. We have human rights film festival planned for November and a public workshop possibly sometime in December.

What are your plans for the next elections? Are you contemplating another run?

I am currently not a member of any political party. But I have been asked by opposition party friends, civil society members, personal acquaintances and family as well as members of the public to seriously consider participating in the next elections. Their opinions are something I am taking seriously

If yes, tell us more about your plans. Which party are you partial to and why?

At this stage, all I am thinking about is where best I can add value. I can bring existing networks and human resources etc wherever I go. I am straight shooter and I don’t back down in a fight. So I want to be in the company of people who have the same temperament and solidarity. I have my personal collection of issues which I plan to weave into an electoral campaign these include (not exhaustive):

a.       Less foreign workers, a more transparent immigration policy.

b.      Reduce the cost of living

c.       Reduce ministers salaries

d.      Promote diversity, legislate against discrimination

e.       Establish an independent election commission of Singapore

f.       Abolish the Internal Security Act

g.      Abolish the death penalty

What do you think the key issue in this upcoming elections will be and why?

It will be the foreign worker issue. PAP has overcrowded Singapore with too many cheap foreign workers, bursting our local infrastructure, depressing wages and making Singaporeans feel foreign in their own country and also creating hardships for foreign workers. Whatever policy reversals the PAP announces and no matter what spin the mainstream media puts on it, essentially it is all too little too late. To ensure the foreign worker issue does not get worse the PAP needs to be held accountable and kept in check by defeating it at the next elections.

Another indirect issue going into the next elections will be the credibility of the local mainstream media. I am expecting the local media to get a further beating at the next elections. Already the circulation of many of the print media is down and when the internet shows up the biasness of the local media in the next elections local media credibility will go down further and drive more people to the internet and way from the PAP.

There is a school of thought that believes the Singaporean electorate is inherently pragmatic, conservative, and cautious. Do you think that’s true, and if so, how will you try to overcome that?

This true to some extent but where we need to pay our attention to as Singapore heads towards its 11th general elections is the younger voters and voters who are consuming their political information via the internet. Because the mainstream media is held in discredit for its local political news and because total internet users has increased to 3,370,000 with a penetration of 72.4% and is pushing more people to get their political information online. So I will encourage those interested in regime change to put some amount of attention to reaching out to Singaporeans via new media.

Do you think the importance of retail politics (hand shaking and baby kissing) has diminished with the increasing influence of new media?

Yes because politics is more visual. It is about imagery, choreography, short videos and sound bites. Quite a lot of it is also moving towards mobile hand held devices and this is something to lookout for in Singapore in the next general elections as current 3G Mobile subscription is at 2,927,700 and climbing. Meanwhile the traditional methods are still used but they play a smaller role. With so many foreigners in Singapore, traditional methods such as door to door visits and flyer distribution are not labour and cost effective. In Singapore, the new media is becoming the popular choice as it is less labour and cost intensive.

Tell us more about your family, there hasn’t been a lot of press on them. Are they supportive of your political aspirations?

My father, Thomas Vincent Gomez, who founded the Singapore Manual and Mercantile Worker`s Union was in the news quite a bit in the late 50s and bit later in early 60s with court cases associated with it. But he has since passed on. My mother, who is in her 70s, cuts clippings from the press whenever I have been in the news. She was keeping busy in the last elections but news about me has been a bit thin in the recent years. Who knows she might get busy soon. But since most of my news has shifted to the internet, I am thinking of buying her a hard disk to save stuff there instead 🙂

.
Details of the Singaporeans for Democracy event can be found here

Continue Reading
Click to comment
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Current Affairs

TJC issued 3rd POFMA order under Minister K Shanmugam for alleged falsehoods

The Transformative Justice Collective (TJC) was issued its third POFMA correction order on 5 October 2024 under the direction of Minister K Shanmugam for alleged falsehoods about death penalty processes. TJC has rejected the government’s claims, describing POFMA as a tool to suppress dissent.

Published

on

The Transformative Justice Collective (TJC), an advocacy group opposed to the death penalty, was issued its third Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act (POFMA) correction direction on 5 October 2024.

The correction was ordered by Minister for Home Affairs and Law, K Shanmugam, following TJC’s publication of what the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) alleges to be false information regarding Singapore’s death row procedures and the prosecution of drug trafficking cases.

These statements were made on TJC’s website and across its social media platforms, including Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, and X (formerly Twitter).

In addition to TJC, civil activist Kokila Annamalai was also issued a correction direction by the minister over posts she made on Facebook and X between 4 and 5 October 2024.

According to MHA, these posts echoed similar views on the death penalty and the legal procedures for drug-related offences, and contained statements that the ministry claims are false concerning the treatment of death row prisoners and the state’s legal responsibilities in drug trafficking cases.

MHA stated that the posts suggested the government schedules and stays executions arbitrarily, without due regard to legal processes, and that the state does not bear the burden of proving drug trafficking charges.

However, these alleged falsehoods are contested by MHA, which maintains that the government strictly follows legal procedures, scheduling executions only after all legal avenues have been exhausted, and that the state always carries the burden of proof in such cases.

In its official release, MHA emphasised, “The prosecution always bears the legal burden of proving its case beyond a reasonable doubt, and this applies to all criminal offences, including drug trafficking.”

It also pointed to an article on the government fact-checking site Factually to provide further clarification on the issues raised.

As a result of these allegations, both TJC and Annamalai are now required to post correction notices. TJC must display these corrections on its website and social media platforms, while Annamalai is required to carry similar notices on her Facebook and X posts.

TikTok has also been issued a targeted correction direction, requiring the platform to communicate the correction to all Singapore-based users who viewed the related TJC post.

In a statement following the issuance of the correction direction, TJC strongly rejected the government’s claims. The group criticised the POFMA law, calling it a “political weapon used to crush dissent,” and argued that the order was more about the exercise of state power than the pursuit of truth. “We have put up the Correction Directions not because we accept any of what the government asserts, but because of the grossly unjust terms of the POFMA law,” TJC stated.

TJC further argued that the government’s control over Singapore’s media landscape enables it to push pro-death penalty views without opposition. The group also stated that it would not engage in prolonged legal battles over the POFMA correction orders, opting to focus on its abolitionist work instead.

This marks the third time TJC has been subject to a POFMA correction direction in recent months.

The group was previously issued two orders in August 2024 for making similar statements concerning death row prisoners.

In its latest statement, MHA noted that despite being corrected previously, TJC had repeated what the ministry views as falsehoods.

MHA also criticised TJC for presenting the perspective of a convicted drug trafficker without acknowledging the harm caused to victims of drug abuse.

Annamalai, a prominent civil rights activist, is also known for her involvement in various social justice campaigns. She was charged in June 2024 for her participation in a pro-Palestinian procession near the Istana. Her posts, now subject to correction, contained information similar to those presented by TJC regarding death penalty procedures and drug-related cases.

POFMA, which was introduced in 2019, allows the government to issue correction directions when it deems falsehoods are being spread online.

Critics of the law argue that it can be used to suppress dissent, while the government asserts that it is a necessary tool for combating misinformation. The law has been frequently invoked against opposition politicians and activists.

As of October 2024, Minister K Shanmugam has issued 17 POFMA directions, more than any other minister. Shanmugam, who was instrumental in introducing POFMA, is followed by National Development Minister Desmond Lee, who has issued 10 POFMA directions.

Major media outlets, including The Straits Times, Channel News Asia, and Mothership, have covered the POFMA directions. However, as of the time of writing, none have included TJC’s response rejecting the government’s allegations.

Continue Reading

Current Affairs

Hotel Properties Limited suspends trading ahead of Ong Beng Seng’s court hearing

Hotel Properties Limited (HPL), co-founded by Mr Ong Beng Seng, has halted trading ahead of his court appearance today (4 October). The announcement was made by HPL’s company secretary at about 7.45am, citing a pending release of an announcement. Mr Ong faces one charge of abetting a public servant in obtaining gifts and another charge of obstruction of justice. He is due in court at 2.30pm.

Published

on

SINGAPORE: Hotel Properties Limited (HPL), the property and hotel developer co-founded by Mr Ong Beng Seng, has requested a trading halt ahead of the Singapore tycoon’s scheduled court appearance today (4 October) afternoon.

This announcement was made by HPL’s company secretary at approximately 7.45am, stating that the halt was due to a pending release of an announcement.

Mr Ong, who serves as HPL’s managing director and controlling shareholder, faces one charge under Section 165, accused of abetting a public servant in obtaining gifts, as well as one charge of obstruction of justice.

He is set to appear in court at 2.30pm on 4 October.

Ong’s charges stem from his involvement in a high-profile corruption case linked to former Singaporean transport minister S Iswaran.

The 80-year-old businessman was named in Iswaran’s initial graft charges earlier this year.

These charges alleged that Iswaran had corruptly received valuable gifts from Ong, including tickets to the 2022 Singapore Formula 1 Grand Prix, flights, and a hotel stay in Doha.

These gifts were allegedly provided to advance Ong’s business interests, particularly in securing contracts with the Singapore Tourism Board for the Singapore GP and the ABBA Voyage virtual concert.

Although Iswaran no longer faces the original corruption charges, the prosecution amended them to lesser charges under Section 165.

Iswaran pleaded guilty on 24 September, 2024, to four counts under this section, which covered over S$400,000 worth of gifts, including flight tickets, sports event access, and luxury items like whisky and wines.

Additionally, he faced one count of obstructing justice for repaying Ong for a Doha-Singapore flight shortly before the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB) became involved.

On 3 October, Iswaran was sentenced to one year in jail by presiding judge Justice Vincent Hoong.

The prosecution had sought a sentence of six to seven months for all charges, while the defence had asked for a significantly reduced sentence of no more than eight weeks.

Ong, a Malaysian national based in Singapore, was arrested by CPIB in July 2023 and released on bail shortly thereafter. Although no charges were initially filed against him, Ong’s involvement in the case intensified following Iswaran’s guilty plea.

The Attorney-General’s Chambers (AGC) had earlier indicated that it would soon make a decision regarding Ong’s legal standing, which has now led to the current charges.

According to the statement of facts read during Iswaran’s conviction, Ong’s case came to light as part of a broader investigation into his associates, which revealed Iswaran’s use of Ong’s private jet for a flight from Singapore to Doha in December 2022.

CPIB investigators uncovered the flight manifest and seized the document.

Upon learning that the flight records had been obtained, Ong contacted Iswaran, advising him to arrange for Singapore GP to bill him for the flight.

Iswaran subsequently paid Singapore GP S$5,700 for the Doha-Singapore business class flight in May 2023, forming the basis of his obstruction of justice charge.

Mr Ong is recognised as the figure who brought Formula One to Singapore in 2008, marking the first night race in the sport’s history.

He holds the rights to the Singapore Grand Prix. Iswaran was the chairman of the F1 steering committee and acted as the chief negotiator with Singapore GP on business matters concerning the race.

 

Continue Reading

Trending