Leong Sze Hian

Why are Permanent Residents (PRs) who are single buying HDB resale flats like nobody’s business?

Singaporeans who are single and below age 35 are not allowed to buy HDB resale flats unless they are orphans.

PRs sibings who are single and below 35, however, are allowed to purchase these flats.

Why does our public housing policy favour PRs over Singaporeans? Is it not discriminatory and unfair?

Has any Members of Parliament ever raised this issue vigorously in Parliament?

The mission of the HDB should be to help Singaporeans own homes. So, how can single PRs be given priority over Singaporeans?

If you are a below-35 PR in Singapore, wouldn’t you try to arrange for one of your siblings to come to work in Singapore too, and apply for permanent residency?

Whilst there are no official statistics on how many HDB flats are owned by single PRs, anecdoctal evidence seems to suggest that an increasing number of single PRs may be buying them.

As there are also no official statistics on how many single PR siblings are in Singapore, it may probably not be too far an estimate to say that there may be tens of thousands in total.

When one of the PR siblings leave Singapore, after a resale flat has been purchased, are they still allowed to keep the flat? I believe the answer is yes, at least for a few years.

The cheapest HDB 3-room flat (2 bed-rooms) that a single Singaporean or PR can rent is about S$1,500. With housing loan interest rates at historical lows in Singapore, the monthly repayment for a $220,000 HDB bank loan is only just over $800.

So, is it any wonder why it may make more sense for single PR siblings to buy a resale HDB flat, instead of renting one?

3, 4 and 5-room HDB resale flats are going for around $280,000, $370,000 and $440,000 (median sale prices), respectively, with a typical down-payment of 20 per cent of the purchase price.

PR siblings can sell their resale HDB flats after a Minimum Occupation Period of 5 years. So, from a financial perspective, it may make more sense to buy than to rent, and possibly reap the capital gains as well after 5 years.

The increasing “headache” for some Singaporeans may be that they cannot afford the Cash-Over-Valuation (COV) on a resale flat.

Since PR siblings when they first come to Singapore typically do not have permanent residency status yet, they do not need to contribute to CPF. Thus, they generally may have more cash to pay for COV because their take-home pay is higher without CPF contributions relative to Singaporeans, until such time that they become PRs and qualify to buy HDB resale flats.

Even when they become PRs, the first 2 years’ CPF contribution is lower than for citizens.

2 PR siblings may generally just need to stay in one bedroom.

So, some may rent out rooms immediately after they buy a flat. [PRs can rent out rooms immediately but not the entire flat.] The PR sibling owners can stay in 1 room themselves, and rent the rest of the rooms out. Under HDB rules, you are allowed to have up to 9 persons staying in say a 5-room (4 bed-room flat). So one can rent out to 7 persons, at say $150 per person.

Some PR siblings may also be accustomed to sharing a flat before they buy their resale flat.

So, they may be able to pay higher prices for resale HDB flats, because they plan to rent out the rooms for income.

Singaporeans, on the other hand, generally buy flats to stay without the intention to rent out rooms immediately.

I think most Singaporeans see a HDB flat as their home for life, and not as a temporary investment, providing income as well as saving on housing costs whilst in Singapore.

Are these some of the possible contributing factors to why HDB resale prices have been skyrocketing?

In this connection, HDB resale prices rose about 75 per cent over the last 5 years, compared to a lower appreciation for the private property price index.

HDB policies could be reviewed, with a focus on the undesirable outcomes for Singaporeans, and at the same time vis-a-vis PRs.

————

Read also: HDB flats – S’poreans come first?

Subscribe
Notify of
1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

HSBC provides liquidity and cash management support to outbreak-battered Singapore companies

In the wake the novel coronavirus Covid-19 epidemic, the Singapore branch of…

肖像遭盗用 何晶“被代言”比特币投资

淡马锡控股首席执行长何晶肖像被盗用,以招揽比特币投资者,虽然本人已经否认,但是有关诈骗信息仍在流传,连金融管理局都发出警告,呼吁民众切勿跌入诈骗陷阱。 当局指出,互联网上有网站伪造《海峡时报》报导,捏造指何晶曾经发表“新加坡人通过财富漏洞赚取数百万元”、“大银行震惊了”等言论,另一家网站也贴出何晶的照片,多家新闻媒体的标志,以及类似“新加坡人支付的秘密投资”等标题字眼。 当局表示,相关网站所提供的信息据误导性,且非常具欺骗性,因此促请民众提高警惕。 金融局也呼吁民众若发现有类似诈骗活动的行销或投资活动,应该立即报警。 总理夫人何晶曾于去年11月期间,就相关的“比特币交易计划”等流传数个月的捏造新闻,在脸书上帖文澄清,也呼吁民众不要上当,不要相信任何能够投资致富的手段,更应该停止转发有关报导。 何晶并非首名政治界和金融界被诈骗网站盗用肖像,以哄骗人们进行比特币等“快速致富”投资的人物,其他被盗用者还包括我国总理李显龙、金管局主席兼国务资政兼社会政策统筹部长尚达曼、人力部长杨莉明等。

Let's donate to taxi hijack victim's family

  In their Facebook post, Changi Airport has indicated how members of…

本地大学毕业生找工不易 寄50封求职信仍未有下文

因中美贸易战与经济放缓,企业谨慎请人,本地大学毕业生找工作也不易。 据《联合早报》报导,有毕业生已寄出50多封求职信却仍未有下文;也有人欲申请永久性职位,却被公司要求转成合约工。 例如南洋理工大学毕业生李良城(25岁)修读化学工程,从3月份开始已寄出逾50封履历,但未得到公司的回复。期间虽获数间公司的邀请面试,但后续仍未有下文。 “就把这段时间当做是休息,好好思考方向。如果到了8月还是如此,会再放宽对工作的选择条件。”李良城灰心表示。 另一名有同样境遇的新加坡管理大学毕业生吴先生(25岁)则有意往金融业发展。尽管当初申请分析师工作时,选的是固定正职,但面试后却被问及是否能成为合约工。 “我有听说其他朋友也有类似情况,有些朋友急着找工作,半年合约也接下了。”吴先生说道 合约职缺成主流,毕业生不得不屈服 根据人力部日前发布的第一季劳动市场报告,劳工需求连续七个季度增加后放缓。3月的经季度调整职位空缺为5万7100个,低于去年12月的6万2300个。 而人力部2018年劳动市场报告就指出,永久性职位所占比例从2017年的90.1巴仙下滑到去年的89.4巴仙;合约职位则从6.4巴仙上升到7.2巴仙,增加的大部分是一年性质合约。与此证明,公司近年来都纷纷倾向招聘合约职位,而且会借由工作表现而决定是否继续续约。 接受《联合早报》访问的毕业生罗文杉表示,自己是国大毕业生并修读经济学,他投了40多封求职信,已有九个回复,四个已面试,但仍然希望能获得永久性职位,因为不用再经历合约到期后,又要开始寻找工作的漫漫长路,但若合约工作是签两年以上,或具有学习机会,他也不排斥。 除了四所大学外,私立学院毕业的毕业生,也在寻找工作上遇到困境。根据《今日报》曾报道,私立学院毕业的毕业生要么还在待业中,不然就接受合约职位或兼职工作。 毕业生和其他PMET竞争…