Leong Sze Hian

Why are Permanent Residents (PRs) who are single buying HDB resale flats like nobody’s business?

Singaporeans who are single and below age 35 are not allowed to buy HDB resale flats unless they are orphans.

PRs sibings who are single and below 35, however, are allowed to purchase these flats.

Why does our public housing policy favour PRs over Singaporeans? Is it not discriminatory and unfair?

Has any Members of Parliament ever raised this issue vigorously in Parliament?

The mission of the HDB should be to help Singaporeans own homes. So, how can single PRs be given priority over Singaporeans?

If you are a below-35 PR in Singapore, wouldn’t you try to arrange for one of your siblings to come to work in Singapore too, and apply for permanent residency?

Whilst there are no official statistics on how many HDB flats are owned by single PRs, anecdoctal evidence seems to suggest that an increasing number of single PRs may be buying them.

As there are also no official statistics on how many single PR siblings are in Singapore, it may probably not be too far an estimate to say that there may be tens of thousands in total.

When one of the PR siblings leave Singapore, after a resale flat has been purchased, are they still allowed to keep the flat? I believe the answer is yes, at least for a few years.

The cheapest HDB 3-room flat (2 bed-rooms) that a single Singaporean or PR can rent is about S$1,500. With housing loan interest rates at historical lows in Singapore, the monthly repayment for a $220,000 HDB bank loan is only just over $800.

So, is it any wonder why it may make more sense for single PR siblings to buy a resale HDB flat, instead of renting one?

3, 4 and 5-room HDB resale flats are going for around $280,000, $370,000 and $440,000 (median sale prices), respectively, with a typical down-payment of 20 per cent of the purchase price.

PR siblings can sell their resale HDB flats after a Minimum Occupation Period of 5 years. So, from a financial perspective, it may make more sense to buy than to rent, and possibly reap the capital gains as well after 5 years.

The increasing “headache” for some Singaporeans may be that they cannot afford the Cash-Over-Valuation (COV) on a resale flat.

Since PR siblings when they first come to Singapore typically do not have permanent residency status yet, they do not need to contribute to CPF. Thus, they generally may have more cash to pay for COV because their take-home pay is higher without CPF contributions relative to Singaporeans, until such time that they become PRs and qualify to buy HDB resale flats.

Even when they become PRs, the first 2 years’ CPF contribution is lower than for citizens.

2 PR siblings may generally just need to stay in one bedroom.

So, some may rent out rooms immediately after they buy a flat. [PRs can rent out rooms immediately but not the entire flat.] The PR sibling owners can stay in 1 room themselves, and rent the rest of the rooms out. Under HDB rules, you are allowed to have up to 9 persons staying in say a 5-room (4 bed-room flat). So one can rent out to 7 persons, at say $150 per person.

Some PR siblings may also be accustomed to sharing a flat before they buy their resale flat.

So, they may be able to pay higher prices for resale HDB flats, because they plan to rent out the rooms for income.

Singaporeans, on the other hand, generally buy flats to stay without the intention to rent out rooms immediately.

I think most Singaporeans see a HDB flat as their home for life, and not as a temporary investment, providing income as well as saving on housing costs whilst in Singapore.

Are these some of the possible contributing factors to why HDB resale prices have been skyrocketing?

In this connection, HDB resale prices rose about 75 per cent over the last 5 years, compared to a lower appreciation for the private property price index.

HDB policies could be reviewed, with a focus on the undesirable outcomes for Singaporeans, and at the same time vis-a-vis PRs.

————

Read also: HDB flats – S’poreans come first?

Subscribe
Notify of
1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Meaningless statistics behind the SMRT's claims of improvement for its MRT lines

Reliability of MRT lines improves I refer to the article “Reliability of…

年轻人投80履历工作仍没着落! 惟一些雇主称“找不到合适本地人才”

疫情下对本地就业市场带来冲击,从今年初至今,政府已出台了多达五次的财政援助措施,以期能协助企业和雇员度过疫情下的难关。 副总理王瑞杰等领袖,甚至预料未来数月会有更多人失业,然而这也让更多人开始质问,政府对于保障本地人就业的努力。 对于青年毕业生来说,当前刚毕业要觅职亦面对困难,甚至有年轻国人即使投了数十份履历,还是没能找到合适的全职工作!结果只好去兼职和学习新技能来度过当前危机。 据《今日报》报导,一名27岁受访者Hakim Wijaya,有两三年工作经验,再进入入拉萨尔艺术学院修读大学文凭毕业。然而,过去四个月,她应征多达80职位空缺,有回应只有寥寥数家,且条件也不尽人意。 还有26岁的大学毕业生Roy Ng也同样提交80份工作申请,还是找不到工作,结果打算再就读与商业相关的研究生课程,自我提升。还有者只得接受减薪保住工作。 还有更多类似的故事,例如26岁的准妈妈以为自己能保住饭碗,结果仍被公司裁员;再有原数码设计总监今年2月份被解雇,结果只能骑脚踏车送餐,收入从原本的8千多元,锐减至目前仅2千多元。 然而, 讽刺的是,一些雇主却认为,他们无法在新加坡找不到合适本地人才,例如本地金属包装制造厂Containers Printers总裁曾爱媄声称,虽曾考虑聘请新加坡人,但该公司工作需要一定的技术,聘请新人要花时间培训,所以人手不能说换就换。 一名建筑业者也表示,要找人替代自己公司的马国籍安全协调员不容易,安全管理人员需经过培训和考取证书,不是两三天的事,更何况目前都很少有这种能考取证书的课程在开班。…

网络假消息草案,是新加坡民主空间的进步还是倒退?

政治工作者毕博渊撰文: 在乔治奥威尔的惊悚小说《1984》中,虚构的大洋国政府有四大管理部门,其中之一就是主管新闻、娱乐、教育和艺术的”真相部“。这个特定群体的官员,会决定什么是真相、什么是假的,并且对拒绝服从者采取行动。 2019年,我国政府有意立法赋权少数几位部长,拥有裁决消息真伪的权利,且也可对不服从者采取行动。 这批部长来自一个曾承诺55岁公民领取公积金、却不断跳票的政党团队;他们曾告诉你公共组屋会增值,但如今却承认屋契到期屋价归零;四任民选总统可以增至五任(第一任从黄金辉前总统算起),而原本宣称是印度裔,现任总统可以一夜之间变成马来裔。 打击网络假消息,首先执政者必然是决策立场一贯,才能赢得百姓信任。其二,不必耗费精力立法来让自己有权决定事情真伪。倒不如教育人民批判思考的精神,让他们有能力判断可以相信什么。 我完全赞同,应警惕假消息和可能破坏社会稳定的人士。然而, 让少数人有决定真相的权力,若有续任者不是为公共利益而另有议程,后果不堪设想。 一旦大权在握就难以制衡,我们不知道未来的续任者会如何使用这些权力,所以才更应该慎重待之。 我必须要问:”您乐意您投选的代议士手握这种大权,剥夺你的自主权来帮你决定什么是真,什么是假吗?“ 在打造健全公共辩论和思想交流的新加坡民主空间,这种发展究竟是进步还是倒退?  

A day in court with Yong Vui Kong

~ By Sarah D ~ It is a typical April day, as…