Andrew Loh

In the video that follows this article (see above), a worker submerges himself into a hole which apparently has flooded over. We are unsure how the hole became flooded or what the worker was trying to do by immersing himself into it.

The incident took place on 25 August at about 5.45pm, in an area in Yishun where upgrading works to HDB flats are being carried out, and where some new blocks are being built.

What we would like to ask are the following questions:

  1. Is this the standard operating procedure or task a worker is expected to undertake?
  2. In the video, the worker didn’t seem to have been equipped with any safety device before he immersed himself, at times completely submerged, into the hole. Is this a violation of worksite safety rules?
  3. The water in the hole is muddy. The water apparently reaches to the neck-level of the worker. Is there a risk of infection for the worker from bacteria or of him contracting soil disease?
  4. The water in the hole has, we would imagine, zero visibility. How does this help the worker when he submerges himself into it?
  5. Should not the hole be drained of water first?
  6. Is it allowed to send a worker into a flooded trench which apparently has just been excavated?
  7. What were the instructions given to the worker? And what was he suppose to be doing?
  8. Was the worker given a change of clothes after he had completed the task? Or did he continue to work for the rest of the day in his soaked attire? (We understand the workers worked till the night.)

The hole could have caved in, posing danger to the worker, although – from the video – the hole seems to be shallow. What if it was a deeper hole? In sending the worker into a hole with such poor visibility, the worker could have been caught and trapped underneath, or be seriously injured.

A reason why the worker was sent into the hole could be that they had dug a hole and the excavator hit an underground pipe by mistake and broke it and water started gushing out.

If this were the case, what are the procedures which should be followed?

In a report by Channel Newsasia on 2 August about worksite safety, it says:

“MOM emphasised that supervisors play a critical role to reduce work at height risks in our workplaces as they are directly responsible for many workers on the ground and can make the most immediate impact to how work is carried out.”

The report also says, “Over three months, MOM conducted inspections at over 2,000 worksites islandwide. More than 1,800 safety violations were uncovered at these worksites.”

In July, the Straits Times revealed that “fifteen workers have lost their lives in construction site accidents in the first half of this year, six in May alone.”

In a bid to reduce worksite injuries and fatalities, the Manpower Minister announced, in July, the creation of a S$12m fund which “companies can soon tap … to help them build capabilities in Workplace Safety and Health (WSH).”

But with such flippant attitudes of site supervisors and managers as shown in the incident in the video, one wonders if such funds will achieve their aim.

————

The Online Citizen has sent this article to the Minister and the Ministry of Manpower.

————

Below is excerpt from the Workplace Health and Safety Act:

Duties of employers

12.

(1) It shall be the duty of every employer to take, so far as is reasonably practicable, such measures as are necessary to ensure the safety and health of his employees at work.

(2) It shall be the duty of every employer to take, so far as is reasonably practicable, such measures as are necessary to ensure the safety and health of persons (not being his employees) who may be affected by any undertaking carried on by him in the workplace.

(3) For the purposes of subsection (1), the measures necessary to ensure the safety and health of persons at work include —(a) providing and maintaining for those persons a work environment which is safe, without risk to health, and adequate as regards facilities and arrangements for their welfare at work;(b) ensuring that adequate safety measures are taken in respect of any machinery, equipment, plant, article or process used by those persons;(c) ensuring that those persons are not exposed to hazards arising out of the arrangement, disposal, manipulation, organisation, processing, storage, transport, working or use of things —(i) in their workplace; or(ii) near their workplace and under the control of the employer;(d) developing and implementing procedures for dealing with emergencies that may arise while those persons are at work; and(e) ensuring that those persons at work have adequate instruction, information, training and supervision as is necessary for them to perform their work.

(4) Every employer shall, where required by the regulations, give to persons (not being his employees) the prescribed information about such aspects of the way in which he conducts his undertaking as might affect their safety or health while those persons are at his workplace.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

PAP must depoliticise the People’s Association for their own good

~by: Eric Tan Heng Chong~ The debate continues on the role of…

“文明社会不惩处公民私人评论” 李绳武称已缴付罚款

因为2017年7月的一则脸书贴文,批评我国政府“好诉讼” (ligitious),法庭制度“温顺” (pliant),李显扬之子李绳武,遭总检察署起诉藐视法庭。 上月29日,高庭裁决李绳武藐视法庭罪名成立,判罚款1万5000元,或一周监禁。 对于这项诉讼,李绳武在个人脸书更新资讯,称他已决定缴付罚款,以换来耳根清净。“缴付罚款,可避免给新加坡政府有便宜的借口,来攻击我和我的家人。” 但他强调,这并不代表他认罪,也不会否认在私人帖文中公开给友人的文字,坚称他写的东西并没有触法。再者,一个文明社会,不该因为公民的私人评论谈及司法系统,就因此以言入罪。 他重申,尽管政府声称他的私人贴文“丑化司法机构”,但他认为,滥用国家资源打压个人言论,才是真正的丑事。 “在为期三年的诉讼,新加坡总检察署写了千页法律文件、撤销我辩护宣誓书(defence affidavit)中的一些部分、还要求我公开我在脸书上所有的朋友。” 李绳武早在今年1月,已选择不参与这项诉讼,“不抬举总检察署所作所为”。然而即使他没参与,还是花了半年时间才有诉讼结果,“拖沓得足以使政府处理疫情失当、还召开选举。”

Fallen canopy at Tuas Checkpoint injuries two

Two canopies at the Tuas Checkpoint fell down at 5.35 AM this…

【冠状病毒19】俄罗斯女子体内发现多达18种变异病毒

根据俄罗斯《消息报》报导,俄罗斯研究人员在一名47岁,患有淋巴瘤的女子体内中发现多达18中变异病毒。 据了解,女子去年4月在一次化疗中染疫,但截至9月9日前,其检测结果一直为阳性。 而在她体内发现的变异病毒,与此前所观察到在免疫功能较弱的患者的突变病毒相同,且部分变种毒株与英国的变异毒株相同。 另外她体内还与两种同丹麦水貂所携带的变异毒株吻合;但她和水貂相关感染群并无关联。 对此,西伯利亚联邦大学基因组学与生物信息学系教授康斯坦丁指出,这是首次确认,冠病病毒在生物体内长期存在,即会导致大量突变出现。 但他也指出,现阶段判定俄罗斯毒株有传播现象,还为时过早,因为目前仅限一例。 截至昨日(12日)俄罗斯目前共有近345万起确诊病例,仅次于美国、印度和巴西,死亡病例多达6万2804起。