Andrew Loh

It is upsetting to see when politicians hijack the plight of the poor for their own selfish political agenda.

On 4 September, Senior Minister Goh Chok Tong was quoted by Channelnewsasia, in a report titled “SM Goh asks Singaporeans to view problems in perspective”, as having said the following:

“It’s important for those who are facing problems of success – like inadequate car parks and housing at the top end – to think of those who are struggling to make a living everyday. There are many people who are not able to benefit from our overall success. So just remember that, as we also try to solve our own problems at the top end.”

The Straits Times quoted SM Goh thus:

“I want to put these challenges into perspective with the overall needs of our society… There are still some poor people. Those who are disabled and those who needed help (sic).”

On the surface, it may seem there is nothing wrong with what SM Goh said – until you see it in the wider context.

In recent months, there has been a growing chorus of complaints among Singaporeans over a myriad of issues – such as the huge number of foreigners in Singapore, the crowded trains, and the flooding in many areas whenever it rains. There were also unhappiness over the spending on the Youth Olympic Games and increasingly the question of what it means to be Singaporean.

The finger for all these complaints is pointed squarely at the government and its policies – and rightly so.

And so in steps SM Goh, attempting to hijack the plight of the poor in order to put the problems “in perspective” and deflect criticisms of his party’s policies.

This is, however, not the first time that SM Goh has used the problems of the less fortunate for political purposes.

In 2006, during the General Elections, he too brought up the less fortunate– in Hougang.

“Old people, the disabled, the wheelchair-bound. I saw many of them in Hougang… I feel we should help them. This is not politics. Whether Eric Low wins or Low Thia Khiang wins, we are going to help the old people in Hougang… They struggled with Mr Lee Kuan Yew, they struggled with me. Today, they’re in their 70s. Without them, we won’t have today’s Singapore for the young, Internet-savvy Singaporeans. So we never forget them. We will help them regardless of the outcome.”

The PAP’s candidate, Eric Low, was defeated by the incumbent Low Thia Khiang. SM Goh, who was given the task of winning back Hougang for the PAP, as far as I am aware, stopped taking an interest in Hougang after that. Indeed, immediately following the elections results, Eric Low himself put a stop to all the programmes which he had been doing in the ward prior to the elections.

Gone too were the S$100 million upgrading plans which SM Goh had dangled before Hougang voters during the hustings.

So much for wanting to help the poor. It was an empty promise made for purely political purposes.

So too was SM Goh’s promise during the 1997 General Elections – that if voters there voted for the PAP candidates, they would have a “direct line” to him, the then-Prime Minister. By the next elections, however, the entire Cheng San GRC had been erased from the electoral map.

In any event, SM Goh’s latest concerns for the poor, going by what his fellow ministers have said, are misguided.

In 2007, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong announced the increase of the GST by two per cent, to seven per cent. This, he said, was “in order to tilt the playing field in favour of” the less well-off. He said then, “[My]  purpose is to help the lower income group.”

And just earlier this year, in March, MCYS Minister Vivian Balakrishnan laid to rest any concerns about the poor. The minister said;

“If you were a poor person, anywhere on this planet, Singapore is the one place where you will have a roof over your head, where you will have food on the table. Even if you can’t afford it, we will have meals delivered to you. You will get healthcare.  Do not lose sight of the fundamentals. And I am confident that we have done our duty for the people who need our help.”

Taking all these in perspective, one can only conclude that SM Goh’s remarks on Saturday are nothing but pure political distraction for the government already seems to be doing all it can to help the needy.

Yet, there is more that the government can do and should do. If SM Goh is serious about helping poorer Singaporeans, he should seriously look into the following, among others:

– Wage depression of the lower-income

– The growing number of those who are defaulting on their mortgage loans

– The escalating housing prices which is making it difficult for poorer Singaporeans to purchase flats

– Concerns of the poor over healthcare costs

SM Goh could also question the government on some of its spending which have raised questions about whether it would have been better to use these to help the poor. An example is the S$387 million spent on the Youth Olympic Games. He could also ask the Prime Minister if his plans to “tilt the playing field in favour of the lower income group” have worked out as the Prime Minister envisaged.

There are many things SM Goh could do and many questions he could ask of his government, if he were truly concerned about the needy.

But will he?

Alas, one suspects his “concerns” are nothing more than political smokescreen, to camouflage the shortcomings of his government’s policies which are hurting Singaporeans, as the next General Election approaches.

Instead of asking Singaporeans to view things in “perspective”, SM Goh should instead stop displaying fake concerns about the poor in his shameful attempt to hide the failures of the PAP’s policies.

For if he were truly concerned, perhaps he should first return to Hougang and make good the promise he made to the “old people, the disabled, the wheelchair-bound” in that ward.

Or has the Senior Minister forgotten about them?

————

Picture from Straits Times.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Budget Babe: TIQ property course does work, but caveats remain

In a write-up piece by Budget Babe which evaluated the authenticity of…

抨击陈振声巧言令色 杨南强:“如有诚意促进社会平等,何以基薪政策仍可悲?”

“如果我们的最高领导们,真的有诚意帮助社会弱势群体、创造更平等的机会,为何我们扶助绝对贫穷群体的基本薪资政策,还是如此可悲?” 新加坡政府投资公司前首席经济师杨南强,抨击贸工部长陈振声,与其巧言令色声称精英应该回馈社会,倒不如把拨款用在更实质、有效的政策,以便在更大程度上根除令新加坡耻辱的贫富不均问题。 杨南强是针对上月26日,陈振声在公共政策研究所的论坛上发表的谈话,于前日于脸书撰文公开抨击后者。 陈振声在公共政策研究所30周年论坛上,参与讨论贫富不均课题,他曾指出,经一番努力而取得成就的人不应被泛指为精英主义者,只要他们关心较弱势群体,尽力回馈社会,就不宜给他们贴上这样的负面标签。 杨南强:国家有能力提高就业入息补助 也曾担任国大李光耀公共政策研究所兼职教授的杨南强,指出我国绝对有能力把就业入息补贴计划和乐龄补助计划,提升到每月600元,让那些收入不足的群体能满足基本需求。 “然而,决策者仍冥顽不灵,不愿为涵括大部分绝对贫穷、年长群体的这两项政策,投入更多。” 这笔花费只占GDP的不到一巴仙,无需增加税收。多数研究表明,扩大辅助不会减少工作动力,反而能大大改善穷人的自主能力。 仁政从改革社会政策开始 “恰恰是在上世纪90年代、2000-2010年间,我国落实的过度移民政策压低了劳工工资,形成了穷忙族,至少有30-40万人口活在绝对贫穷中。” “陈振声部长作为有才智、风度的领导者,曾在社会与家庭发展部和文化、社区及青年部任职超过三年,以及执掌职总秘书长一职达三年。如果这么多年来,他位处高职都没有、没办法去改善贫穷者的处境,那请问还有哪些精英领导会这么做?” 他在文末告诫政府精英们,真正有智慧的仁政,应该是从更深层的政策思想转变和国内社会改革开始,否则所有的漂亮话都只是空谈而已。

Singaporean fined for trying to evade GST after underdeclaring cost of goods

A Singaporean male was fined for trying to evade Goods and Services Tax…

“Please do not twist facts”: Netizens chide Education Minister after claiming rise in imported cases not due to travellers entering S’pore

Education Minister Lawrence Wong said on Monday (25 January) that the recent…