~by: Kumaran Pillai~

"What Singaporeans want are quicker solutions. They don't want to wait so long, “said Minister of State for Finance and Transport Josephine Teo.

The solution according to her (or them) is to buy more buses. Putting more buses on the road, only addresses the issue of capacity, it does not necessarily mean that the transport companies would become more efficient. Unless, the Government is investing in new technology, for example, electric buses or hybrid buses, some would argue that we will be better off spending the money on something else.

Doling out such huge sums of monies to private or public companies is an anti-thesis to innovation. This is typical of countries with huge reserves or surpluses; invention and innovation takes a back seat because it is cheaper to buy (or transfer technology) than to innovate. In the same grain, it is far cheaper to import talent than to train our locals. So there is nothing new there, this is typical of a rich state.

The key question on my mind is, why increase the capacity by so much and why so suddenly? We are expanding our train network at the same time. There are new train lines in the works and with plans to add more trains in the existing network with a newer signalling system, why expand the bus network?

Unless, the government is anticipating a corresponding increase in population, I don’t see an immediate need to expand our overall transport capacity by so much. I do acknowledge that there are capacity issues with our current transport network and we need to expand our transport infrastructure. But, what the government is budgeting for far exceeds the current or future needs of the current population size. Our government has also learnt from the past that increasing the population before increasing our transport capacity is not the way to go. So it would be safe to assume that the government is investing in the future with a bigger (more foreign) population in mind.

Our elder statesman Lee Kuan Yew has already hinted to us in his recent speeches about the ‘need’ for more foreigners to keep our economy humming. It seems to me that he is the only one telling us what is happening; our population is going to increase, hence the injections into our transport systems.

Which brings me to the statement made by Joe Teo, is the government or the people looking for quicker solutions? Why can’t the ministers come clean and give us the full picture of what they plan to do in the next five to ten years with regards to our target population in the years ahead.

At first pass, it seems like a quick fix to our transport woes. But, the more one thinks of plausible reasons for why the government is doing what they are doing, it is easy to conclude that we are expanding our transport network well ahead of population increases.

The key question remains, if this is what Singaporeans want and if this is what they (Singaporean) can’t wait to have?

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

National Gallery Singapore logo inspired artworks

Early this month, National Art Gallery unveiled two new things: its shortened…

声称可治疗近视 卫生科学局调查视力明和ICC Visioncare

广告声称可治疗近视,卫生科学局接获投诉,针对两家视力保健公司展开调查。 这两家公司便是视立明(SLM Visioncare)和ICC Visioncare,当局正调查他们是否违反“保健产品(医疗器材)条例”。另一方面,当局还还接获总共六起针对视力明的投诉。 据《今日报》报导,视力明在官网声称能以物理疗法协助“改善眼睛睫状肌的血液流通河弹性”,协助从近视中恢复;也宣称对于6至16岁孩童“特别有效”。 与此同时,ICC Visioncare则宣称协助多达10万视力障碍患者,透过他们的疗程恢复视力。 不过,视力明则告知《今日报》,质疑有关投诉的真实性,仍宣称有30年在中港台以及新加坡运营的经验,几乎不曾接到任何投诉。 除了这次被卫生科学局调查,社交媒体脸书上,也有声称是该公司前雇员开设的群组,揭露一名马国女生邱玉莉遭受职场霸凌最终轻生,人力部亦为此展开调查。 至于卫生部则提醒,根据《药品法(广告与销售)》,任何提供医疗保健服务的公司,都不能针对任何疾病(包括近视)的治疗之服务和技术进行宣传,以避免误导消费者。 据了解,其中一名投诉者Daniel Wang,告知《今日报》他为自己10岁的孩子,花了2千490元在视力明接受每周三次、为期三个月的近视治疗。…

SPP: “The people shall not be bullied any more.”

Benjamin Cheah / photos by Jean Loo Sound and fury were the…