From Yawning Bread:

I was speechless after reading the Straits Times’ version of the story about a protest note being lodged at the Singapore High Commission in Kuala Lumpur. It told readers about all the stuff peripheral to the main issue but said not a word about Mourthi Vasu’s demand that Singapore acknowledge with contrition committing a miscarriage of justice when his son was hanged in 2003.

The story was covered in a timely manner in The Online Citizen yesterday (10 August 2010). Headlined “I want my son’s name back”, the web story made clear that the chief issue was the way the trial of Vignes Mourthi was conducted, leading to his conviction for trafficking in 27.65g of heroin and subsequent hanging.

Full article by Alex Au here.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Are evangelists religious extremists?

Alvin Phoon attempts to balance between the freedom to propagate religion and the right to privacy.

Report card for town councils

“Teo, your report card is not looking very good at all…”

New security measures target all Singaporeans

Like the Newspaper and Printing Presses Amendment Bill in 1986, which targeted not…

China’s social safety net – should S’pore do the same?

Chiina’s social insurance plan may see its citizens enjoying old-age pensions and insurance for medical care, work injuries, unemployment and childbirth.