The Court of Appeal will be delivering its judgement this Friday, 14 May, on Yong Vui Kong’s appeal. The hearing will take place at 11am.

It has been two months since Yong made his appeal on 15 March. He is appealing against the death sentence which was imposed on him in 2007 when he was caught with 47g of diamorphine. He was found guilty of drug trafficking and was given the mandatory death penalty.

Originally scheduled to hang on 4 December last year, his lawyer, Mr Madasamy Ravi, persuaded the court that Yong had not had his appeal heard, as was his right under the Constitution. The court agreed and granted Yong a hearing on 15 March. In that hearing, Mr Madasamy argued that the mandatory death penalty was unconstitutional, citing many judicial decisions in other jurisdictions all over the world.

On Sunday, 9 May, Law Minister K Shanmugam defended the Singapore government’s position on the issue. According to the Straits Times, the minister “believes this stand has saved thousands of lives… The penalty applies to a crimes [sic] such as murder, kidnapping and drug trafficking, and Mr Shanmugam believes it has had a deterrent effect, and sent a clear signal to drug barons on Singapore’s position.”

The Online Citizen has been campaigning for a moratorium on the mandatory death penalty since Yong’s case came to light.

You can read the articles and view the videos here: Campaign for a moratorium on the mandatory death penalty.

By Andrew Loh

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

JCI seeks volunteers for climate change event

Help spread the message this Saturday.

25-year old collapses during football match and dies in hospital

Tragedy at football match for the homeless. Terence Lee.

CPF restoration: Good or bad news?

I refer to the report, “CPF contribution to be raised by 1%…

ASEAN human rights commission stumbles at first hurdle

ASEAN’s Inter-Governmental Commission on Human Rights is now holding its first meeting and is showing, from the start, that it will dispense with one of the basic requirements of a human rights commission