The title of this article is a question which I have been pondering on for some time now. Have we lost our ability to appreciate the good things which Singapore offers? And to be sure, there are good things about Singapore. In fact, there are many of them.

Yet, when we visit the Internet, it would seem, as Mr Lui Tuck Yew said in February 2009, that there is “a prevalence of noises, rumours and distortions in cyberspace…. while there were reasoned and critical views, there were also a great deal of unhelpful commentary and discussions online”. (Source)

And to a certain extent, the Minister for Information, Communications and the Arts is not entirely wrong.

Now, I am no fan of the minister whom I think has adopted a rather unnecessarily confrontational stance towards the Internet community since he became Mica minister. But that does not take away from the fact that indeed there seems to be an entirely different Singapore painted by netizens, if you go by postings especially on socio-political blogs and websites, The Online Citizen included.

Of course there is room for dissent and for different viewpoints. What I am asking here is: Is Singapore or the Singapore government so entirely devoid of anything good that we only have criticisms for it? And have we lost our ability to appreciate the positives?

It would take a courageous blogger to praise Singapore or the government when it is deserved, it would seem.

So, you may ask, what exactly is good about Singapore? Well, each person will have his own views on these. For me, first and foremost, I appreciate the safety and security we have. It’s a cliché, yes, but it is nonetheless true that Singapore is safe. Yes, we can debate about the draconian and prohibitive laws and rules, some of which we hope will be removed one day – such as the Internal Security Act. But Singapore is safe. Everyone knows it. Just take a walk past midnight anywhere on this island.

The grumblings and complaints about the transport system have become almost legendary now. Yet, it is also true that the MRT system, especially, is by and large an efficient and comfortable ride. Of course, again, there are improvements to be made, such as overcrowding during certain times of the day. But this is something which will always be  a work in progress. I do not think we will ever reach a stage where we will have a 100 per cent consensus on happiness or satisfaction about the quality of service. Truth be told, nonetheless, I am quite impressed by the newly-opened Circle Line and the Land Transport Authority should be commended for a job well done. (My only wish is that the stations should be more colourful but that is another matter altogether.)

The Youth Olympics, which will take place from the 14th to 26th August this year, is another thing we can and should be proud of. And I commend the MCYS team, especially Mr Teo Ser Luck, for successfully winning the bid to bring the games here.

What about the government itself, which is the target of much unhappiness among netizens? I feel that the problem is a real one, that of hubris. The People’s Action Party, which has ruled independent Singapore since 1965, has grown arrogant and out-of-touch with the average common man and woman. This is self-evident in many instances, especially these past 10 years or so. And the main culprit, I feel, is Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew who, despite his age, sets the tone for the government led by his son.

Having said that, however, I do feel there are good people in government nonetheless. One whom I quite like is Finance Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam. I would prefer him to be Prime Minister, rather than the incumbent. This is not to say that Mr Tharman has no shortcomings. His pussyfooting around the issue of investment losses incurred by both Temasek Holdings and the Government of Singapore Investment Corporation (GIC) two years ago revealed the delicate tight-rope he had to walk. But from all accounts, or at least those that I have been given to know, he is a sincere man who is well-liked, someone who is seen to be intelligent, a good listener and one with his feet firmly set on the ground.

At the lower level, some PAP Members of Parliament too, I feel, are good MPs. One whom I have often praised is Lee Bee Wah. This is because I used to be her constituent. Sure, she screwed up notably with her rather unbecoming remarks in Parliament three years ago and her handling of the STTA saga in 2008. The criticisms leveled at her in 2008 were, in my opinion, well and truly deserved. But that does not take away from the fact that she is a very hardworking MP on the ground. Even now, when I have moved from her constituency in Ang Mo Kio GRC, I still receive invitations to attend her grassroots activities. Well, perhaps this is because she has not updated her constituents roll but that is not the point. In my experience, her presence on the ground, in the coffeeshops, markets, at her Meet-The-People sessions, were ubiquitous and regular. My only hope is that the STTA saga has taught her further lessons in politics and humility.

There are many other things I could list which we should be happy about. Some of these are physical attributes, such as downtown Marina Bay/Clark Quay which is beautiful. Others would include the easy availability and the variety of food we have here.

And then there are the people. Singaporeans. Idiosyncrasies, yes, but also positivities. I have met selfless individuals, passionate individuals who give of their time to help others. I have seen, many times, for example, the younger ones giving up their seats on trains and buses to the elderly. I have seen young girls who would give $5 to the elderly selling tissue paper. I do feel it is an over-generalisation that people are selfish, a refrain which is oft-repeated. I also do feel we do not give Singaporeans enough credit.

Yet, Singapore can be better. Any country can be better. What I hope for Singapore, now that we have proved that we can build physical infrastructures, is that we have more heart. That we would value things of the human spirit. By this I mean, for example, the value of human life, dignity for the less fortunate, compassion which is second nature to us, and appreciation for those who do not measure up to society’s standards.

Perhaps these are the things which we presently lack, things which would truly help us appreciate that behind all the grand facades we are a people whose blood runs deeper. A people whose accomplishments go beyond the material or physical and into the realm of spirit.

Now, that would indeed be something worth appreciating, more than all the beautiful skyscrapers we behold.

But for now, lets not forget to appreciate what we have.

Andrew Loh

—————-

Picture from haddock’s photostream

—————

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

惊!民众目击员工无安全装备在帐篷顶行走

工作人员在没有佩戴任何安全设备之下,于帐篷上行走,人力部(MOM)获悉后介入调查。 公民记者JC,日前告知网络新闻网站《Stomp》,曾于周二(9月17日)下午2时50分左右,在经过义顺2大道时,看见令他感到惊心动魄的一幕。 他看到数名工作人员在没有佩戴任何安全设备下,在大帐篷上行走和坐下,不禁为这些人员的安危感到担忧。 他透过信息交流平台WhatsApp上传了数张照片,照片中的员工们在帐篷上或行走、站立和坐下。“帐篷的材料是否经得起一个人的在上面行走的重量?我没有看到任何安全措施。” 他指出,帐篷的表面并不平整,呈半圆状态,表面看起来很光滑,因此担心工人不慎而发生意外。 “你能想象吗?若其中一人从那样的高度掉下来,可能会发生很糟糕的事情。” 人力部:已展开调查 他认为有些意外是可以避免和预防的,而且在那个情况下工作,员工的生命受到威胁。 网民表示,他并没有要针对任何人,只是认为有关做法实在不安全,应该获得改善,毕竟没人希望意外发生,员工的命也是命。 “我知道他们是想要谋生,但是请先确保个人安全。” 人力部获悉有关事件后,在回应《Stomp》询问时表示,已经针对此事展开调查。

小学华文课本歌颂李光耀为“伟大的园丁”

脸书专页獅子島上: 新加坡人生活日記,前日发布一则照片,照片是华文小学二年级教科书的内页,内容和已故建国总理李光耀有关。 作者提到:尽管新加坡建国领导之一李光耀,生前嘱咐不要在他身故之后有任何的造神。但是,新加坡华语小二年级的教科书,带点疑似“造神”的形态。 有关题为《伟大的园丁》的小学课本文章内容如下: 很多年前,他在荷兰村种下了一棵黄牛木。后来,他每年都会在这个小岛上种下一棵树。 现在,这个小小的岛国已经变成了大大的花园,到处都有高大的树木,遍地开满鲜艳的花朵。 我们住在这个美丽的岛国。我们热爱这个美丽的花园。我们感谢这位伟大的园丁,他就是见过总理–李光耀先生! 贴文作者提到,如果他有小孩的话,会教导他或她,建立新加坡不是一个人的功劳。 其实早在2016年3月,《海峡时报》刊载一则《我们的父亲,我们的国家,我们的旗帜》的文章,配图是由110名17至35岁新加坡人用4877块印有国旗的擦胶,拼成高3.1米宽2.3米的李光耀肖像。 这种吹捧和造神行为,就连李光耀的女儿李玮玲都受不了,当时让她直接宣告罢写《海时》专栏。 李玮玲直言这样的描绘,想起1976年隨父亲访问文化大革命时代的中国,中方安排大批孩子在街上列队欢迎。但是李光耀则不甚认同,曾指出新加坡人“不习惯面对过度、不自然发出的情感。”  …

已涉刑事法典509 律师点评对涉事国大男生惩处“不寻常”

新加坡国立大学一名女生冲凉被偷拍,不过校方的惩处方式引来各界非议,除了逾四万人联署要求家中对涉案男生惩罚,教育部长王乙康也表态认为校方在此事采取的处分“明显不足”。 对于涉案男生获得的惩处,一些律师也在接受《海峡时报》采访表达观点,认为有鉴于其他案例的涉事者都被提控,但有关涉事男生有条件警告,“似乎不寻常”。 去年11月,一名国大23岁的国大传播系四年级女学生,在新该校尤索夫宿舍,发现自己被人用手机偷拍,女事主事后向校园保安人员投诉,并且报警处理。她称,校舍电眼拍到男生闯入不同宿舍浴室隔间寻找下手对象,他们后来也在男生手机里找到她冲凉的视频,这些证据都由校方交给警方处理。 女生称,警方接着花了两个月的时间彻查,最终向男生发出有条件的严厉警告(conditional stern warning):男生在12个月内不得重犯,否则可能在原有的罪名上,连带任何新的罪行一起被提控。 而国大校方对于男生的惩处,则是勒令停学一个学期、接受强制辅导、不让他进入尤索夫宿舍,并要他写道歉信给受害女生马芸。 至于律师对此事则点评道,即便对于性骚扰犯罪初犯者,这样的惩处很罕见,因为在刑事法典509条文下,“侵犯女性尊严”会构成罪行。 仅接警告   未经司法审讯 赢必胜法律事务所(Invictus Law…

Which opposition party will come up tops this election?

The following is an excerpt fromsgpolitics.net Ng E-Jay/ This general election will…