I refer to the report,  Only one case of non-compliance” (TODAY April 6) on the Public Transport Council’s review of bus service standards.

Every day,  many students and adults rely on both bus and rail  transport to go to school and to work.

As fare-paying customers, they have every right to expect the following service standards.  Not just affordable fares and timely arrivals, but also a pleasant ride which means  air-conditioned comfort with proper circulation of cool clean air in the cabins.

Why the concern?   Because this is also a public health issue.  Our jam-packed public transportation system  is a possible mode for the transmission of various air-borne infectious diseases, such as  Common Cold, Influenza, Tuberculosis, SARS, H1N1 and Bird Flu.

For years, many long-suffering commuters have provided feedback about the stuffy and dusty  interiors of our crowded buses and trains.  Many buses have a lingering smell of stale air, and their aircon vents are often encrusted with black dust which could harbour mould.  When breathe in, mould can cause respiratory or asthma problems especially for young students and elderly commuters.

Alas, such customer feedback have fallen on deaf ears.  Despite being public transport regulator, the Land Transport Authority (LTA) had conveniently passed the buck to the respective bus or rail operator to cook up defensive  “non-answer” replies.

To protect both the health and travel comfort of public transport commuters, why is it so difficult for the LTA to lay down and enforce these service standards on our bus and train operators:

After bus and train services end at midnight, cleaning crew to move in with heavy-duty vacuum cleaners to suck dust from aircon vents and floors.  The interiors must be cleaned on a daily basis because of the heavy usage of public transport.

“High-touch” surfaces, such as grab handles and poles should be wiped clean with an appropriate disinfectant.

Set stringent intervals for aircon maintenance and changing of dirty aircon filters.

If the LTA cannot enforce such a simple service standard that will definitely encourage more Singaporeans to switch to public transport, its claim of a  “World-Class Public Transport System” will just be an empty boast.  It now remains for Transport Minister Raymond Lim and his well-paid LTA bureaucrats to “walk the talk”.

David See

This is a letter which was rejected for publication by Today.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

728集会已捕获49人 港警斥示威者”愈演愈烈“

香港近日来每周都有反送中行动,昨日(28日)港民发起由中环遮打花园游行至中山纪念公园,追究警方7月 21日清场行动的不满,惟警方只批准在遮打花园进行集会。 综合港媒报道,当日数以万计参与集会人士占据德辅道中,经过金钟一直走向铜锣湾方向,沿途示威者以“黑警! 可耻! ”、“时代革命,光复香港”等口号表示抗议。 约下午5点时,示威者更兵分多路,除了部分示威者留守遮打花园,示威者纷纷向西环、铜锣湾、湾仔前进。部分示威者经过湾仔警总时不对叫骂,但暂时未有包围行动。 但截至晚间7时,示威者聚集于西区警署,警方开始清场,部分激进示威者更向警方投掷砖头等杂物,警方以适当武力制止及驱散,并使用催泪烟,避免与示威者正面冲突。 行动期间,有激进示威者在多处地方纵火,警民冲突再次升级。 警方批示威者行为愈演愈烈,表示已49人被捕 警察公共关系科高级警司余铠均,于凌晨(29日)召开记者会指事件至今共49人被捕,并予以最严厉谴责,批评他们行为愈演愈烈,激进示威者以“ 致命武器”袭击警员及四围纵火,亦有示威者以桠杈向警员射钢珠、投掷漆弹、怀疑腐蚀性液体及路牌等。 同时也批评示威者尽管仅获得遮打花园的示威批准,却仍不遵守指示,纷纷向东、西散去,造成交通阻塞,严重妨碍路况。…

Kian Teck Dormitory sees eight linked cases after dormitory cleared by MOM for COVID-19

Eight additional COVID-19 cases are linked to the cluster at Kian Teck…

【选举】各选区抽样计票结果【即时更新】

我国投票站在今晚(7月10日)10时正,全部关闭,并在约11时30分,抽样结果陆续出炉。 所谓的抽样计票结果,是指每个投票站的计票助理,在各党监票员和候选人面前随机抽取100张选票进行计算,之后再结合同一选区内所有投票站的抽样成绩,平均统计出候选人或候选团队的得票率。 截至目前为止,所接获的抽样结果成绩如下: 武吉巴督: 人民行动党57%  对   民主党43% 丰加北:  人民行动党 63% 对   前进党…

有数十亿元储备 新加坡公立大学还有调整学费之必要?

昨日(7月28日)《海峡时报星期刊》报导,指新加坡国立大学坐拥95亿储备金,在去年3月底结束的财政年度中,收到2亿2700万元捐款,并赚取6亿200元的投资收入,成为我国最成功的筹款机构。 最成功10大募款机构,榜上有名的还有另外两间大学,分别是位居第四,拥有37亿储备金的南洋理工大学(NTU)和第九,拥有12亿元的新加坡科技设计大学(SUTD)。 国大发言人指出,该大学利用储备金赚取投资收入,用于资助不同运作费,如奖学金、支持研究和推广企业化,该大学大学需要继续筹款让储备金处于健康水平,才能加强长期的财务可持续性。 对此,旅居台湾的博客鄞义林评述,他计算过,国人缴付的税赋理应足以支撑新加坡公共学府的运营,然而国人在2017年约在大学学费上花费10亿新元,反观这些学府还有12亿元的盈余。 他也质疑,政府资助这些公共大学,但新加坡本地学府也是征收最贵学费的地区之一。他也提醒,这些盈利也会流入国家储备,而国家主权基金可用之进行投资,为国家带来更多收入。 “换言之,国人已经为教育缴纳足够的税赋,然而行动党政府还要人民承担更多学费(全球第五贵),这些学府赚有盈余,反观不少毕业生毕业后需面对负债,这公平么?” 回顾三月份,本地大学公布2019年的大学学费,其中本地学生就读牙科和医科的学费,各调涨500元和900元;永久居民医科学费则调涨1050元。但六所本地公立大学其余90巴仙科系不受影响。 这使得牙科科系的学费总额达3万9550元,而医科高达6万0800元。但教育部强调,津贴已涵盖了学生75巴仙的学费负担,且需不时检讨费用。