I refer to the report,  Only one case of non-compliance” (TODAY April 6) on the Public Transport Council’s review of bus service standards.

Every day,  many students and adults rely on both bus and rail  transport to go to school and to work.

As fare-paying customers, they have every right to expect the following service standards.  Not just affordable fares and timely arrivals, but also a pleasant ride which means  air-conditioned comfort with proper circulation of cool clean air in the cabins.

Why the concern?   Because this is also a public health issue.  Our jam-packed public transportation system  is a possible mode for the transmission of various air-borne infectious diseases, such as  Common Cold, Influenza, Tuberculosis, SARS, H1N1 and Bird Flu.

For years, many long-suffering commuters have provided feedback about the stuffy and dusty  interiors of our crowded buses and trains.  Many buses have a lingering smell of stale air, and their aircon vents are often encrusted with black dust which could harbour mould.  When breathe in, mould can cause respiratory or asthma problems especially for young students and elderly commuters.

Alas, such customer feedback have fallen on deaf ears.  Despite being public transport regulator, the Land Transport Authority (LTA) had conveniently passed the buck to the respective bus or rail operator to cook up defensive  “non-answer” replies.

To protect both the health and travel comfort of public transport commuters, why is it so difficult for the LTA to lay down and enforce these service standards on our bus and train operators:

After bus and train services end at midnight, cleaning crew to move in with heavy-duty vacuum cleaners to suck dust from aircon vents and floors.  The interiors must be cleaned on a daily basis because of the heavy usage of public transport.

“High-touch” surfaces, such as grab handles and poles should be wiped clean with an appropriate disinfectant.

Set stringent intervals for aircon maintenance and changing of dirty aircon filters.

If the LTA cannot enforce such a simple service standard that will definitely encourage more Singaporeans to switch to public transport, its claim of a  “World-Class Public Transport System” will just be an empty boast.  It now remains for Transport Minister Raymond Lim and his well-paid LTA bureaucrats to “walk the talk”.

David See

This is a letter which was rejected for publication by Today.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Price of 95-octane grade petrol dropped 20 cents a litre due to oil price crash

In Singapore, the price of the most popular 95-octane grade petrol at…

SMRT fires train driver involved in fatal accident that claimed two lives at Pasir Ris MRT station

SMRT Corporation fires train driver who was involved in the fatal accident…

Hearing to determine by-election in Marsiling Yew Tee GRC set to be held on 15 Jan 2018

Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) has announced that the hearing for the legal action…

DFS裁员风波:调整被裁雇员遣散费

日前遭传将裁员的DFS烟酒免税店,在经过多轮的谈判后,向裁员员工提供新的遣散配套。 据《今日报》报导,DFS集团写给被裁员工的通知书上表示,目前将根据雇员工作年资历获得每年一个月的薪水,以工龄25年为上限。据悉,之前在遣散费的比例,仅达上限13年,低于人力部的规定准则。 据报道,被裁员工已在周一受到公司消息,并请求他们到位于菜市区的办公室讨论遣散费的新条款。 DFS发言人表示,综合员工的反馈与遵照新加坡劳商工友联合会(Singapore Manual and Mercantile Workers’ Union)的意见,致力在裁员事件上取得平衡。他续指,该公司与劳资政公平与良好雇佣联盟,与外部就业机构,在过渡期一同协助受影响的员工。” 今年8月,DFS烟酒免税商店宣布明年6月退出樟宜机场,当时已预计近百名员工将失去工作。而DFS则向《商业时报》透露,DFS聘请约500名员工经营机场分行,因此他们在DFS结束运营后将会分散到各地的分行工作,或可以选择与新的运营商或其他机场商店合作。 出乎意料的是,DFS却被爆出在一个月后采取大规模的裁员活动,大部分的员工来自史各士路的DFS T广场,指60多名DFS T广场(T…