I refer to the report,  Only one case of non-compliance” (TODAY April 6) on the Public Transport Council’s review of bus service standards.

Every day,  many students and adults rely on both bus and rail  transport to go to school and to work.

As fare-paying customers, they have every right to expect the following service standards.  Not just affordable fares and timely arrivals, but also a pleasant ride which means  air-conditioned comfort with proper circulation of cool clean air in the cabins.

Why the concern?   Because this is also a public health issue.  Our jam-packed public transportation system  is a possible mode for the transmission of various air-borne infectious diseases, such as  Common Cold, Influenza, Tuberculosis, SARS, H1N1 and Bird Flu.

For years, many long-suffering commuters have provided feedback about the stuffy and dusty  interiors of our crowded buses and trains.  Many buses have a lingering smell of stale air, and their aircon vents are often encrusted with black dust which could harbour mould.  When breathe in, mould can cause respiratory or asthma problems especially for young students and elderly commuters.

Alas, such customer feedback have fallen on deaf ears.  Despite being public transport regulator, the Land Transport Authority (LTA) had conveniently passed the buck to the respective bus or rail operator to cook up defensive  “non-answer” replies.

To protect both the health and travel comfort of public transport commuters, why is it so difficult for the LTA to lay down and enforce these service standards on our bus and train operators:

After bus and train services end at midnight, cleaning crew to move in with heavy-duty vacuum cleaners to suck dust from aircon vents and floors.  The interiors must be cleaned on a daily basis because of the heavy usage of public transport.

“High-touch” surfaces, such as grab handles and poles should be wiped clean with an appropriate disinfectant.

Set stringent intervals for aircon maintenance and changing of dirty aircon filters.

If the LTA cannot enforce such a simple service standard that will definitely encourage more Singaporeans to switch to public transport, its claim of a  “World-Class Public Transport System” will just be an empty boast.  It now remains for Transport Minister Raymond Lim and his well-paid LTA bureaucrats to “walk the talk”.

David See

This is a letter which was rejected for publication by Today.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

过去14天曾在10地区逗留旅客 后日起入境无需居家隔离

政府跨部门工作小组称,过去14天,曾到过亚太十个地区逗留的旅客,本月17日午夜起,入境我国后将无需再到指定隔离设施履行居家通知令。 这是个地区包括:香港、日本、越南、澳门、中国、新西兰、韩国、台湾、澳洲和文莱。 我国公民和永久居民可在自家遵守居家通知;长期证件持有者,可在他们或家人住所,或租来住处居家隔离,或自费到酒店隔离。 他们都须全天候留在住处,当局会通过电子追踪配备或派人上门检查,密切留意他们的行踪,并会对违反居家通知的人采取严厉的执法行动。 不过,其他旅客仍须到指定隔离设施,遵守居家通知。

涉欺瞒人力部 谎报员工薪资 餐饮公司GD遭罚逾九万元

餐饮业者GD集团涉欺瞒人力资源部,虚报多达20名客工的工资,以符合申请就业准证(Employment Pass)的要求。GD集团为此面对20项抵触雇佣外来人力法令的控状,被法庭罚款9万4500元。 根据人力部网站资料,只有合格外籍人士才能领取就业准证,在新加坡工作,其中包括有关客工需有合格相关资历,并领取至少3千600元月薪。 然而,人力部文告指出,在2013年2月至2015年7月,GD集团为了聘请更多客工,虚报20名客工的薪水。该公司替他们谎报4千元-4千800元的月薪,而实际上该公司只给这些客工1千500至2千200元的薪水。 不过,文告未阐明GD公司当初替客工申报了何种“合格资历”,得以获得人力部为这些“外国人才”发出就业准证。 人力部指有关为贵公司透过谎报工资,企图规避外籍劳工的限额规定,藉此骗取客工就业准证,但实际上付给员工的薪资却低于申报薪资。 目前,GD公司也被禁止聘用外籍客工。 “人力部有责任保户守法雇主权益,我们仍会继续惩戒违规雇主,确保企业的公平竞争。” 事实上,这并不是首次发生雇主谎报客工工资的案例。在2014年,也曾有经营便利店的雇主犯下同样错误。 谎报薪资以取得就业准证可视为欺骗行为,每项控状罚款高达两万元,或监禁两年,或两者兼施。    

杨莉明:推迟提款政府无利可图 网民要求准时发放公积金

公积金课题与民息息相关,人力部长杨莉明表明,公积金局或政府要求会员推迟领取入息,只是为了让会员享有更多的利息,并非政府有所贪求。此话一出,网民纷纷表示反对,既然政府表示无利可图,就应该在会员满55岁或65岁时,自动发放或者发放50%的金额,让银发一族享受年轻时的收获成果。 但是,杨莉明表示,并不是所有的会员都会在65岁时领取入息。 “截止2017年年底,6成已经达到可领取入息年龄(Payout Eligibility Age,简称PEA)的会员并没有申请入息发放,甚至约一半的70岁会员没有领取入息。” 杨莉明是在2月18日,于国会针对9名议员就公积金退休存款计划(Retirement Sum Scheme,简称RSS)所发出提问时,作出以上回答。 9名议员是就坊间传出有关退休存款计划的会员可领取入息年龄悄悄地从65岁推迟到70岁一事,做出提问。他们分别有林谋泉(蒙巴登区)、方荣发(后港区)和胡美霞(西海岸集选区)等。 公积金局之前曾作出澄清,表示并没有推迟领取入息年龄。 多会员不清楚领款年龄 在2017年的领入息年龄为64岁,而从2018年起,有关年龄已经调整至65岁,且会员最迟必须在70岁开始领取入息。…

Family of otters nearly got hit by taxi when attempting to cross busy Orchard Road

Why did the otters cross the road? To get to the otter…