One hundred years ago, in 1910, a group of Cantonese merchants founded the Kwong Wai Shiu Hospital (KWSH) to provide their Cantonese comrades with free medical care.  Originally, the hospital only served Cantonese members. In 1974, however, its constitution was amended and it admitted anyone from any ethnic or racial group.

The hospital, located along Serangoon Road and which came about from an agreement between the British colonial authorities and the merchants, was built on a 6 hectare piece of land with a 99-year lease. The British government charged it a nominal annual rental of S$1.

Fast-forward to 2010.

Kwong Wai Shiu Hospital and Nursing Home has 14 buildings within its compound. Its facilities include an In-patient Department (IPD), an Out-patient Department (OPD), a Day Rehabilitation Centre (DRC) and a Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) Centre. It also operates a 350-bed nursing home facility which is dedicated to the care and treatment of senior citizens who need daily treatment on a long term basis.

When its 99-year lease expired in February this year, the land was returned to the Singapore government. After discussions with the Ministry of Health (MO) and the Singapore Land Authority (SLA), the hospital was granted a new 5-year lease – till 2015 – and had its rental increased from the nominal S$1 to S$1.4 million.

When The Online Citizen visited the hospital, we found out that the hospital’s licence to operate as a private hospital and clinic was only for a two-year period – from 01 January 2010 to 31 Dec 2011.

It has been reported by the media that the MOH, under the new agreement, “has agreed to substantial increase in subsidies” for the hospital. These subsidies could be up to S$1 million to pay its rental of S$1.4 million and a further S$4.8 million for its annual expenses. These figures are, however, just speculation as the government has not made any such agreement public. Even the hospital’s management doesn’t seem to know exactly how much the government will provide.

Inevitably, such non-disclosure by the government throws up many questions.

As a non-profit community hospital which has been running as a charity since 1910, and which depends on patient fees and donations, why is the hospital’s rent being raised 1.4 million times, from $1 to $1.4 million?

It is puzzling that the SLA would raise its rental to S$1.4million and then for MOH to say it will subsidise the rental by up to S$1 million. Even if that were so, its rental would still rise by $400,000 – in one fell swoop, without any explanation by the SLA or the MOH.

It is even more curious if you consider that last year, and according to the Straits Times, “four of the six community hospitals here raised their charges, some by as much as S$50 a day” and the MOH did nothing to help them with the costs of operating the hospitals.

Why the sudden ostentatious generosity towards KWSH now?

In conjuction with KWSH’s rental being increased, we now know that MOH only gave $170,000 last year to KWSH, which is only about 1.5 per cent of the hospital’s annual expenses.

I find it puzzling that KWSH was able to maintain prices for the last 16 years with just $170,000 from MOH. Now, however, under an agreement with MOH last September, the ministry said it would provide as much  as 40 per cent of the hospital’s annual expenses – expected to be some $4.8 million. Even with this infusion from MOH, KWSH now says that it does not rule out the possibility of raising prices next year.

So, previously with just $170,000 (which is just 1.5 per cent of its annual expenses), from MOH, the hospital did not have to raise charges, for 16 years.

Now, even with $4.8 million (which is 40 per cent of its annual expenses) from MOH, the hospital may raise charges?

What gives?

We would like to suggest that the agreement be made public, so that we may try to understand why KWSH may have to increase prices, despite a 28-fold increase in MOH funding.

Will the other community hospitals receive similar substantial increase in funding too?

The MOH said, in response to a Straits Times query, that “funding to community hospitals was on a need basis”. What criteria exactly does the MOH use to determine the amount of funding?

Since the agreement was in September last year, why is it taking so long, as about six months have lapsed already, for KWSH to extract financial and patient records for MOH to determine the size of the subsidy funding, as reported by the Straits Times?

Also, as a result of the agreement, KWSH has begun means testing to decide the level of subsidy that each patient should get.

What this means is that a Singaporean patient whose family income is as little as $1,440 (based on a family of four) may have to pay 25 per cent of the cost, rising gradually to 100 per cent for higher income families up to $5,600, in accordance with MOH’s subsidy scale.

This is a departure from KWSH’s 100 year-old tradition of fulfilling its mission of giving free care to anyone, and serving patients without the stress of having to be means-tested under MOH procedures.

In this connection, at least one Voluntary Welfare Organisation (VWO) had opted out of means-testing in the past, to spare its beneficiaries the stress of the process for the critically ill.

Since KWSH had a operating surplus of $1.4 mllion (which coincidentally is what they have to pay for rental now) for the last financial year, perhaps maintaining the status quo without any increase in rent or funding may turn out to be better from the perspective of patients.

As a charity 50-bed community hospital, 350-bed nursing home, out-patient clinic, day rehabilitation centre and traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) centre, we understand that its charges are probably the lowest in Singapore, and most of its patients are the poor and lower-income.

For example, its TCM general consultation with 1-day prescription at $2 and out-patient doctor consultation (inclusive of standard medication) from $8 to $12, are even lower than what the polyclinics charge.

With a staff strength of more than 250 employees plus volunteers, its annual operating expenses of $11.5 million is arguably the most cost-efficient healthcare facility in Singapore.

To encourage more charity healthcare institutions like Kwong Wai Shiu Hospital, the Government should give it more financial assistance, instead of raising its rent.

After all, as we understand, Singapore’s healthcare spending at less than four per cent of GDP, and public healthcare spending at about two per cent of GDP, is already one of the lowest in the world.

Finally, the future of KWSH is uncertain. The hospital’s board members have expressed hope that it will remain as a hospital and nursing home when its current lease expires in 2015. However, a Singapore Land Authority (SLA) spokesman said that it would depend on the outcome of discussions and consultations with MOH and other government agencies.

How different will the KWSH of the future be, after its agreement with MOH for funding?

Perhaps we will only know when its lease ends in 2015.

“My heart was full of pain,” said Ms Ling Bee Sian, director of operations of KWSH, who signed over the hospital to SLA officials in February. “It’s hard to imagine that this land does not belong to us anymore.”

Will poor and lower-income Singaporeans still be able to have KWSH to go to in five years’ time?

Leong Sze Hian / Andrew Loh

———-

Headline picture from: http://www.panoramio.com/photo/11087819

———

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

陈振声:选举局不能过早宣布来届选举规则

日前,工人党质问,有鉴于当前冠状病毒19疫情还未消退,具体在疫情下如何竞选活动到细节和详情,迄今仍待厘清。 对此,贸工部长陈振声表示,选举局不能“过早”宣布与下一次大选有关的规则和规定,因为这些可能会因局势而转变。 在今日(30日)的媒体简报会上,陈振声表示选举局理解竞选需求,也会尽早把必要信息提供给政党和候选人,让他们能去做准备。 他表示已他要求选举局模拟各种情景以探讨是否能与政党和候选人,分享有关规章条例,让他们有充足时间做准备,同时确保这些规章不会因不断变动的局势失效。 陈振声表示,阻断措施结束后的第一、第二和第三阶段,都需要不同的对应措施。 他强调一切取决于总理何时宣布选举,选举局需确保所有措施,能符合当时的情况。

【2020财政预算案】明年一月起购电动汽车 可获高达45巴仙回扣

明年一月起,购买全电动汽车和德士的额外注册费,可获得高达45巴仙的回扣。 副总理兼财政部长王瑞杰于国会上公布新财政预算案时宣布,为了到2040年全面淘汰内燃引擎交通工具,政府推出三项方案: 政府将为轻型货车推出“商用车减排税务计划”;而购买全电动的车辆或德士的人士,在缴交”汽车附加注册费”时将享有45巴仙的津贴,最高可获两万元回扣。优惠将从2021年开始落实,为其三年。 将扩大电动汽车充电基础设施,目前我国有1千600个电动车充电点,而我国期望在2030年能够将充电点扩大至2万8千个充电点。 政府带头逐渐开始采购和使用环保交通工具。 王瑞杰说,政府将从明年1月起,在三年内分阶段对电动车辆征收一次性的路税,一些电动汽车车主需缴付的路税会更高,不过由于有了电动汽车附加注册费优惠,车主仍然可以节省一笔费用。 然而,王瑞杰也透露,燃油消费目前为我国带来至少10亿元的收入,但逐渐被电动车取代,因此,电动车辆不需要支付燃油消费税,就需要更新目前的交通税框架。 对此,政府将在明年1月起,为电动汽车征收一次性支付的路税。但距离我国全面采用该新系统仍有几年的差距,因此,政府将在这段过度期间,改以一次性征税的形式来弥补日后所失的燃油税,并于明年1月至2023年1月份段实施,不过,电动车车主仍能通过电动车附加注册费优惠计划,省下不少成本费用。

马国交通部:两国同意将新柔捷运项目再展延至10月31日

马来西亚交通部昨日(29日)发文宣布,马国及新加坡两国同意,新柔捷运系统(RTS)计划在无需任何附加费用之下,将再展延一个月至10月31日才做出定夺。 我国交通部长许文远和马交长陆兆福,曾于今年5月21日宣布两国将签署新柔捷运(RTS)补充协议,将该计划展延至今年9月30日。不过,马方也因此需附上60万新元的延期费用。 据了解,本次已是大马第六次展延,在此前,该项计划早前已经五度延期,分别是展延至2018年9月份、12月份、今年2月份、3月31日,以及9月30日。延期主要原因为马方需检讨该项目的可行性和成本。 据马国媒体报道,马方认为之前协议中提到的价格过高,因为搭乘柔佛往新加坡一趟是15令吉(约5新元)。 如果两国确定终止计划,马方亦需赔偿我国6千600万新元。 新柔捷运跨越柔佛海峡连接柔佛和我国的地铁线路,旨在解决两国日常交通阻塞问题,该线长达43公里,共设31站。 马方需为该计划承担40亿令吉(约13亿3000万新元)费用,其余60巴仙费用则由我国承担。该捷运原定于2024年投入运作。除此之外,马方也需面对包括征地赔偿等费用,无形中加重该国政府的成本负担。  

Risk of religious sensitivity getting blown out of proportion

By Ghui Religion, multi-culturalism and race are oft-cited reasons for retaining the…