Leong Sze Hian

Singapore Power made profits of $1.086 billion in FY2007/2008, which is a per annum increase of 15 per cent. Despite this, in the last quarter of 2009, electricity tariffs for household was raised by 12.5 per cent. And now, in April 2010, it is being raised again. (See here)

Everyone is asking: Why is the electricity tariff up again on 1 April, despite the decline in real wages last year, about 60,000 residents still unemployed as of December, and Singapore is just coming out of its worst recession?

Well, the answer may be that we do not have the answers to the following questions:-

According to this government website, “From 2000 to 2006, the electricity generated by natural gas has increased from 19% to 78%.” So, why is the electricity tariff pegged to crude oil prices which have been rising, unlike natural gas prices?

Since Singapore’s overall power generation efficiency has improved from 38% in 2000 to 44% in 2006, why has it not been translated into savings for consumers? (See here)

Why are the contracts between power generation companies and suppliers confidential? If such information is public information, we can try to determine the link between crude oil, gas prices and electricity prices, and also how and why so much profits are being made?

Why were all our three power generation companies given to Temasek sold to foreign companies without any debate in Parliament on the sale of such strategic state assets?

In most countries, electricity infrastructure funding is rarely borne by the operators. It is part of national development and, rightly, should come from the state’s coffers. So, why is Singapore so different in this respect? Why not lower electricity and gas charges and fund power infrastructure investments using general taxes?

According to Hong Kong electricity producer CLP Power, which supplies about 80 per cent of Hong Kong’s power needs, in a media statement in Sep 2008, Singapore was ranked second among 21 cities for raising electricity tariffs most, since 2005. Why?

According to the Energy Market Authority’s (EMA’s) chart on fuel oil price versus the low tension tariff, the tariff was $22.62 in January 2008 when fuel oil was $96.64. Since the tariff is pegged to fuel oil, why is the tariff for January 2009, at $22.93, higher than that in January 2008, when fuel oil was lower at $92.99 compared to $96.64 in January 2008? This means that year-on-year, despite a 4-per-cent fall in fuel oil, the tariff increased by 1 per cent. So, is the tariff pegged to fuel oil or not?

Singapore Power made profits of $1.086 billion in FY2007/2008, which is a per annum increase of 15 per cent, from the $630 million profits in FY2003/2004. Why allow a state company that has a monopoly in providing an essential utility to make so much profits?

What are the total profits in a year for the electricity sector, i.e. the delivery of electricity (Singapore Power) and the power generation companies?

Why is it taking so long for there to be competition in the electricity sector, and the opening up of the retail electricity market?

According to the Yearbook of Statistics Singapore, the water, electricity and gas tariffs’ price indices rose by 8.6, 2.8, and 4.2 per cent a year from 1995 to 2005, against inflation of just one per cent.

In the last quarter of 2009, electricity tariffs for household was raised by 12.5 per cent. (Channelnewsasia)

Why were electricity prices allowed to increase so much more than inflation?

Singapore is the country with the highest electricity prices in the region and charges its consumers more than countries like the United States and France. Why?

Why did the number on the Pay As You Use (PAYU) meter scheme increase from 12,200 in December 2006 to 13,243 in 2008?

How many households are in arrears on their electricity bills?

Why are there no regular updates in Parliament or the media, on the statistics of “households in arrears”, number of PAYU meters, electricity sector profits, etc?

How are the key corporate officers and board members selected and appointed to the various boards in the electricity sector? How independent are they? How likely are they to look out for the interests of consumers?

Many of the above questions may not need to be raised in most other countries, as the electricity sector is generally considered as a public good that demands the highest standards of corporate governance, transparency, accountability, parliamentary oversight, etc.

—–

In 2008, in response to a letter to the Straits Times, the Energy Market Authority said:

We agree with Mr Serrien that regulators should create mechanisms to protect consumers instead of simply ‘passing the bill’ to them. This is why the Energy Market Authority has focused on restructuring and liberalising the electricity market, to drive efficiency gains and ensure competitive pricing of electricity. The Government has also set up the Energy Efficiency Programme Office to design and implement energy efficiency programmes across different sectors. Going forward, we will continue to do our part to help households conserve energy and save on their electricity bills.

—–

Headline picture from: http://www.khngai.com

—–

In September 2009:

In April 2010:

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

“Zahari 17 Years” continues to be banned in S’pore – BFC

BFC replies to Martyn See’s submission of six films for classification under the Films Act.

财长:跟上国际脚步 19日起减消费税优惠

财政部长王瑞杰今日(18日)公布财政预算案,明日(2月19日)起减少消费税优惠(GST Import Relief),即离开新加坡少于48小时的人士,所获得的消费税免税优惠将只有100新元,比原先的150元减了50元;而离境超过48小时,消费税减税优惠也从原本的600元,减少到500元。 只有新加坡公民、永久居民(PR)和旅客享有以上的免税优惠。而烈酒和烟草,还有商业用途物品,都不属可获免税优惠物品范围内。 王瑞杰表示,这是为了确保我国在国际旅游业逐渐蓬勃发展的情况下,税务系统能够跟上国际变化。他指出,国家将会随着调整入境旅客所得到的税务优惠。 4月调整酒类免税优惠 另外,他指出,酒类免税优惠也将在4月起做出调整。入境新加坡人士可携带或购买的免税酒,也将从目前的3公升减至2公升,而烈酒的免税优惠则不变,仍然保持在1公升。免税酒的选择包括了有葡萄酒和啤酒产品。 另外,要获得酒类免税优惠,购买者必须是满18岁、抵达新加坡前在外地逗留不少过48小时,而且不是从马来西亚出境到新加坡的人士。 关注低收入和年长群体 王瑞杰表示,低收入群体和年长群体仍然是政府关注的对象。因此政府将继续承担公共津贴教育和保健的消费税,并加强永久消费税补助券,帮助低收入者和年长者。抵消消费税配套也将提供给中低收入的家庭。 其他的税务调整也包括了放宽祖父母看护者估税扣税范围、消费税将在来临的2021年到2025年,上调两个百分点。

莱佛士码头一号南座大厦 证实出现一起确诊病例

莱佛士码头一号南座大厦管理层,发文告证实昨日(20日),获通报该大厦曾出现一名武汉冠状病毒(COVID-19)确诊病患,最后一次到该大厦是在本月10日。 上述确诊病例相信是来自该大厦其中一家租户的职员。为安全起见,租户已从11日起落实分开办公,只有少数职员还在该大厦办公。 管理层在文告中也像租户强调,已对有关单位进行消毒,提高清洁公共场所、电梯和厕所等地区的频率以及为出入大厦的人士进行体温检测。 截至20日,本地累计确诊病例增至85起,最新确诊病患是36岁中国籍男子,工作准证持有者。但近期未回到中国,他是在昨早确诊并已送往国家传染病中心接受隔离。 第83起为54岁男公民,近期未到过中国,惟常到马国公干。在入院前曾到Philemon Singapore 公司(加冷坊16)上班,住在盛港河谷通道(Rivervale Drive)一带。 第84起病例,则是35岁女公民,近期也未到过中国,,她与第66例(28岁男公民,在神召会恩典堂工作)有关联。 第84例是在19日早上确诊,在入院前她曾到Lonza Biologics(大士南6道35号)上班,也曾到过武吉士白沙浮广场。她住在阿裕尼路一带。

Deep sense of learned helplessness prevailing in the nation

by Dr Ang Yong Guan I sense that there is a deep…