The following letter has been sent to SBS Transit. We are awaiting its reply.

Kimmy Tan

I have never seen anything like that in all my 20 years of taking public bus.

On 28th July 2009, at about 7.15pm, my mum and I were waiting for bus service number 80 along Upper Serangoon road. The bus finally came at about 7.40pm (SBS9281Y). As we always take this bus service to catch a charity show at 8pm, we noted that the bus seemed to have arrived slightly late. We boarded the bus.

On nearing our desired destination along MacPherson road, a passenger pressed the bell. We readied ourselves to alight. However, to our alarm, the bus veered off from first lane to the second. Other passengers who wanted to disembark at the same stop started asking the driver why he had not stopped at the bus stop. The driver quietly replied that he “forgot” to stop. I found that hard to believe.

The bus stop between the last one (which he has stopped) to the bus stop in dispute is very near. The driver would only need to keep to the first lane for the next 200m or so. I noticed that the traffic was quite congested near the bus stop that we wanted to alight at. Was the driver behind schedule, and in his haste to play catch up, “overlooked” one bus stop? I requested the driver to issue complimentary tickets so that we could take a bus back to our destination but he refused, challenging us to make a complaint against him with no apology whatsoever.

Subsequently, he abruptly stopped his vehicle by the roadside and opened the doors without another word. My mum, eager to catch the 8pm show which she was already late for, beckoned me to get down. We had to walk about a hundred metres back. Four of the five alighting passengers, including my mum, were senior citizens aged above 60 years.

I urge SBS Transit to look into this matter seriously and give me a satisfactory answer.

—-

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Singapore, the 'miracle' economy?

~ By Gordon Lee ~ Lee Kuan Yew. He is a great…

Some changes at TOC

  Dear Readers, As some of you may have heard by now,…

SPF issues alert on Traffic Police impersonation

Singapore Police Force (SPF) has announced that it is aware of reports…

雅加达暴乱发现神秘信封袋 印尼警方:有人蓄意煽动暴乱

印尼选委会21日凌晨正式公布大选结果,如同预期,现任总统佐科(Joko Widodo)以55.5巴仙的过半得票率打败普拉博沃(Prabowo ),成功连任。但普拉博沃拒绝接受结果,发起“选举无效”诉讼,其支持者们21日晚间更聚集在中选会总部抗议,与警方爆发严重冲突。 截至22日天亮为止,已知有六名示威者死亡——反对派民众指控警方以“实弹镇压”才会有人死亡;警方表示,现场被捕的暴民“大多不是雅加达本地人”,有者身上搜出“装满现金的同款神秘信封袋”,因此全案将朝“蓄意煽动暴乱”的方向侦查。 印尼于今年首次举办 “多合一选举”,是全世界最大规模的“单日投票选举”。投票当日印尼超过1亿9000名合格选民,于短短数小时内投下了总统票、国会票与地方议会票,夸张庞大的选务工作与票务物流,也让印尼上下“全国总动员”。 而投票截止结束后,印尼各大媒体联合出口民调,认为佐科已“笃定当选”,但反对派候选人普拉博沃,与他的保守派民粹政党“大印尼运动党”(Gerindra)并不接受结果,声称佐科利用国家机器进行“舞弊坐票”。 普拉博沃也多次宣布不承认选后结果,并誓言“必将提起选举无效之诉”,“为了印尼人民的宪政民主奋战到底!”于是选后计票的1个月内,朝野各党也都积极动员、预备著结果公布后的“政治决战”。而伊斯兰强硬派团体与普拉博沃也不认同选举结果,侗言到中选会进行抗议。 因此,印尼政府也调度了大批军警进驻首都雅加达,并透过各种管道“呼吁民众冷静”、“尊重民主的选择”,而印尼中选会为了缓冲支持者的激动情绪,竟选择在21日凌晨宣布结果。 由于目前正值“斋戒月”时期,白天仍相安无事,但到了21日晚间9点斋月晚间的特别礼拜“泰拉威”(Tarawih)过后——近千名反对选举结果的示威者,却突然成群结队地出现在雅加达市区,并朝中选会总部方向集结前进,试图突破军警隔离、闯入中选会。围绕在中选会大楼外的警民冲突,自此一夜开打。 根据雅加达省政府翌日的清点公告,21日的选举暴乱,一路持续到22日破晓——整起事件共有101名“暴乱者”被捕;冲突中有200人受伤,已知至少6人死亡。 各方政党呼吁停止暴乱,普拉博沃否认发动暴乱…