KJ

Singapore is a safe city, we like to say. Say it often enough, loudly enough, and strangely, it becomes actual enough, safe in our factual fantasy.

Singapore is a safe city, because there is ‘an absence of desperate poverty’, says Kishore Mahbubani.[1] Singapore is a safe city, because ‘the government has created an ‘ecosystem’ that resulted in this high level of personal safety.’ In safe city Singapore, there is low crime, few murders. Singaporeans earn their daily bread, diligently, honestly, safely. Because of the government, there’s enough bread to go around, unlike places like Switzerland and New York City, where Mr Kishore Mahbubani was almost mugged mercilessly. Singapore is a safe city.

***

Singapore is a safe city. The mornings are calm and the streets are orderly. We’re not like those willy-nilly liberal democracies, where crazy rioters run amok almost, like, daily. We have little patience for such fluffy frivolities. Singapore is a safe city. Three’s a crowd and two’s a company, and one is now an illegal assembly. Ask for permission to speak publicly, lest you be rounded into prison, seething privately. Refrain from speaking up for the downtrodden, like foreign workers or the Opposition, however they tempt you seditiously, for you might be detained, indefinitely, by Internal Security.

***

Singapore is a safe city because of its ‘tough attitudes on law and order’, says Kishore Mahbubani. In safe city Singapore, we whip teenage boys for being teenage boys, and we hang drug mules on transit, young as a foal, foolish as the young. No foreign president or prime minister can persuade a presidential pardon. Because Singapore is a safe city. What is one death amidst so much safety? Safe city Singapore depends on draconian laws executed punitively. Laws that hover above our city, keeping Singapore safe, safe-keeping our thriving economy, compromising neither sovereignty nor survivability.

***

Singapore is a safe city. We’re an international financial centre, located strategically in a region of endless opportunities. Billions of dollars of private wealth funds are parked here safely. VIPs visit us regularly, like Burma’s Prime Minister General Soe Win, and Zimbabwe’s Mr Mugabe. Singapore is a safe city. Dictators and their cronies come here for our medical facilities, our shopping and dining activities. Singapore is a safe city. Get well soon and enjoy our hospitality, beloved friends and unnamable cronies. The holiday will do you good, surely. Singapore is a safe city. The powerful are protected, and the powerful go scot-free. All these are made known publicly. There is no lack at all of transparency.

***

Singapore is a safe city. There are no famines, tsunamis, or other unthinkable catastrophes. Our water is safe to drink, and our enemies are kept at bay. Singapore is a safe city. There are no wars here, as NS is made compulsory. We have a strong and mighty army, standing and waiting, ever on the ready. Singapore is a safe city. Except, maybe, when army boys die while on serious duty. Killed by a grenade or collided with a frigate, dunked by compatriots or crushed by a Rover. But all these are rather secondary, really, because Singapore is a safe city, must be a safe city. That’s why NS is made compulsory – a dire necessity – even if our boys might die while on peace-time duty. It’s all for the sake of our beloved country, Singapore, the safe, safe, city.

***

Singapore is a safe city. The government plays it safe, and safety measures are taken seriously. Key institutions of the state, from the bureaucracy to the judiciary to the universities, are bosom buddies of our unique democracy. Our main and only press is headed by a former minister, and our newspaper editors are hired from our spy agencies. Singapore is a safe city, and safety measures are taken seriously. Even when our first-rate bureaucracy has been deemed sloppy: ‘Lax in managing public funds and opt for convenience’, thunders the Auditor-General fiercely. It seems more like a dereliction of duty, but it is not the civil servants’ fault, surely. Because Singapore is a safe city, and our bookish bureaucracy is only playing it safe. Imbibing the safety manual, going by the book, prudently, meekly, safely.

***

Singapore is a safe city. But ‘despite all our successes’, Singaporeans ‘should not be complacent’, says Kishore Mahbubani. Indeed, we must not. We must be on our toes and we must pull up our socks. But we must also toe the line, and we must not rock the boat too much. Otherwise, waves of clear and present danger will arise, and Singapore, the safe city, will perish just quite easily. Singapore is a safe city. But O such fragility. Naturally, Singaporeans play it safely, and safety measures are taken just as seriously. We shift our glances as we whisper about the PAP. We clam up when we’re invited by the Opposition parties. We follow the rules and do as we’re told. We keep up with the Joneses and we keep down our high jinks. Give us this day our OB markers, and forgive us our careless trespasses. Lead us not into Sedition, but deliver us away from Perdition. This way, Singapore will be a safe city, is a safe city, and Singaporeans will be brought to salvation – by the PAP – eventually.

***

Singapore is a safe city. Say it often enough, loudly enough, hopefully and daily, and it might become a miracle of the Singapore Story. In a city of drones, how unsafe can it get, seriously.

But what do you say, Mr Kishore Mahbubani, if I don’t want to live in a safe city, where the voices are silenced, T-shirts are imprisoned, and human beings hanged. What do you say, Mr Kishore Mahbubani, if I don’t want to live in a safe city, that forces upon me the false dichotomy, of liberty versus poverty, of ruling party over democracy. What do you say, Mr Kishore Mahbubani, if I don’t want to live in a safe city, safe to the point of stifling sterility, safe in a pool of nauseating conformity, safe in a tomb of deadly mediocrity. O Mr Kishore Mahbubani, hallowed be thy name, thy Singapore come, thy will be done. Lead me not into this safe, safe, city, but save me from this insane, insufferable, imperialism of safety.


[1] Kishore Mahbubani, “Why S’pore Enjoys a Low Crime Rate”, The Straits Times, 15 July 2009.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Need for greater awareness, international attention on Rohingya issue: Maruah forum

By Howard Lee The plight of the Rohingya people extends way back…

Expert on “Talking Point” says, shaking your car while pumping petrol don’t give you more fuel but netizens disagree based on personal experience

It’s a common sight in Singapore to see people shaking and tilting…

Workers' Party cautions Govt against amending POHA after Court's ruling

In a statement that was issued on Sunday, Workers’ Party expressed its…

香港民阵组织召集人岑子杰旺角遇袭,情况稳定

香港泛民组织“民间人权阵线”召集人岑子杰昨日(16日)晚上在旺角遭到身份不明的男子袭击,受伤倒地。 根据港媒报导,事发于晚上7点,有四至五名凶徒以铁锤袭击岑子杰,遇袭期间有附近居民向试图上前营救却被凶徒以刀恐吓,而凶徒在行凶后即搭车离去。 当时岑子杰遭袭击的照片也被流传开来,照片显示,岑子杰在遇袭后身染血迹,伤势看似严重。 随后民阵也发出文告证实岑子杰遇袭,并表示岑子杰头部流血,手脚关节亦有受伤,在送院时,岑子杰的意识清醒。目前情况稳定,正在病房休息。 针对岑子杰遇袭事件,民阵表示强烈谴责,并直称事件难免让人联想到散步政治恐慌,要求警方彻查此事。 由于岑子杰遇袭,让示威者关注周日的游行是否会取消。对此,民阵亦表态,坚决周日举办游行,并写道,“五大诉求,缺一不可,香港人,星期日尖沙咀见”。 此次已是岑子杰两个月以来第二次遭遇袭击,上次是在8月29日,当时在佐敦德兴街的餐厅内,被两名持有垒滚球及铁桶的蒙面男子攻击,一名民阵成员上前阻止,确凿对方以武器殴打手臂,而当时岑子杰本人则无受伤。 根据《香港01》的报导,岑子杰的遇袭可能与政治有关。岑子杰曾协助筹办第一次与第二次反对修订《逃犯条例》的游行示威。 他也曾在反送中行动中,发动与参与多场大型示威活动,例如:2019年6月9日的“守护香港反送中”游行、发动6月16的 反对修订《逃犯条例》、谴责警方暴力行为的“谴责镇压,撤回恶法”大游行 。 同时也建议示威者市、…