Excerpts from Yawning Bread.

Singapore’s Penal Code is based on India’s. We too used to have a Section 377 that criminalised “carnal intercourse against the order of nature”, which like India’s applied to both homosexual and heterosexual relationships, but this was repealed in 2007.

However Singapore has an additional Section of the Penal Code, known as Section 377A which specifically targets gay men, criminalising “gross indecency between two males”. The government deliberately let 377A stand in 2007, even when they repealed Section 377. Explaining why, the Singapore government said they wanted to decriminalise oral and anal sex between heterosexual couples, but keep it a criminal offence between gay men. Society was still conservative (i.e. many people didn’t know a damn thing about homosexuality and wanted their prejudices enshrined in law), the government said.

In other words, the Singapore government did exactly what the judges in Delhi said was constitutionally wrong – criminal law held captive by popular misconception.

Read the full article here.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Does Singapore need Economic Restructuring II or another 'Wage Revolution?' Part 1

~ By Prof Lim Chong Yah ~ Paper presented at the Economic Society…

More police resources could have prevented escalation of violence

By Terry Xu / Andrew Loh Lt Tiffany Neo of the Singapore…

PTC approves fare hikes for bus and train operators: Huge increase for fares paid in cash

The Public Transport Council (PTC) has approved a fare increase for train…

【选举】网民讥“全是一类” 陈振声吁莫给行动党新人贴标签

人民行动党最近刚介绍了27名准候选人。不过,有网民嘲讽,这些准候选人看起来好像都来自“同一类”,不是出身军伍、不然就是公务员、医生或律师等等,和原行动党议员似乎都来自同一群体。 对此行动党第二助理秘书长、贸工部长陈振声则表示,民众不必依据新人的职业,就为他们归类“贴标签”(英语原意pigeonhole),再者应考量该党整体93名准候选人,实则都来自不同领域。 他指出,有者出身商界、社会领域、公共服务领域等,“所以我们可以说涵盖了各界。” 他说,人们应该避免根据这些新人的职业,来武断地标签他们。陈振声称,与其因为他们来自特定背景,就为他们贴标签,他认为实则新人们都有各自的个性值得人们去了解。 当被询及行动党缺乏印裔候选人,陈振声则表示,该党有九名印裔准候选人,其中六人还是政治职务者。