Andrew Loh with special thanks to “wildpoppies2009”

In December 2008, Bangladeshi worker Mohamad Kamaluddin, 28, was found dead in his dormitory at 468 Tagore Industrial Avenue. He was an employee of Gates Offshore, a ship repair and dormitory services company.

Kamaluddin had contracted chicken pox but was not given any medical assistance by his employer or the police, which his fellow workers said, had visited the dormitory several times prior to Kamaluddin’s death. We understand that his employer had given his family S$167.

We have learnt that legal firm, Leonard Loo & Partners and the non-government organization, TWC2, recently submitted a notification of Kamaluddin’s death to the Ministry of Manpower (MOM).  MOM was never notified by the employer, Gates Offshore, or Mr Paul Lee.  The policy was that the employer is to notify MOM of the accident.  However, the worker  or his family could also notify MOM if they found out that the employer, in this case Gates Offshore/Paul Lee, did not notify MOM.  Kamaluddin died late last year.  MOM was only notified in June 2009!

Below is an exclusive, never-before-seen video of the scenes at the dormitory at 468 Tagore Industrial Avenue on the morning of 28 December 2008, the day Kamaluddin’s body was discovered motionless in the dormitory. The police had been called and his fellow workers had spilled onto the roads outside the dormitory, which housed about 700 workers, outraged at the way they were being treated.

Mohd Kamaluddin (middle), his wife and son (left) and Kamaluddin’s mother (right)

Read also:

Mohamed Kamaluddin by The Online Citizen

Bangladeshi worker found dead in dorm by Today

3 more get chicken pox by The Straits Times

Family grieves as body of Bangladeshi who died of chickenpox arrives home by The Straits Times

——

As the economy takes a dive, migrant workers are told there are no more jobs for them and many are left without any money, some relying on aid workers for their daily meals. In the following video, several workers speak about their plight. Most of them have since been repatriated – either with a few hundred dollars to bring home or nothing at all – after having paid agents thousands of dollars to work in Singapore and being exploited by unscrupulous employers.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Formation of Electoral Boundaries Review Committee announced on 4 Sept

The Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong has convened Electoral Boundaries Review Committee…

舆论:保障人民,还是维护自家人?

政治拘留者、人权律师张素兰撰文于本社英语站 只要人民行动党在位越久,严刑峻法只会越发令人窒息。 《2009年公共秩序法令》以及《2016年司法(保护)法案》就是最好例子,它们不是为了捍卫人民或司法公义,反而是保护政府免受批评。 遗憾的是,法院容许这些法规的荒谬定义:一个人也可以构成“非法集会”,行为艺术也被当作“非法游行”。没有构成任何公共财产损坏,只是张贴海报都可以被告“破坏公物”,面对监禁和罚款。 即使对于个人来说,都没有言论自由的空间,这种恶法还可以糟糕到什么程度? 就在今年4月1日愚人节,律政部长提呈长达81页的《防止网络假信息和网络操纵法案》,在国会一读,不过他可没在开玩笑。 这是有史以来,但恐怕不会是最后一次,所有的部长和他们的政府机构同侪、公务员,只要冠以“主管当局”之名,就可以正正当当地对着所有个人、媒体机构、网络平台指点江山,发出更正指示修改他们所谓的真相。 只要他们相信任何影像、文章或贴文“违反公共利益”,就可以下令撤下、封锁之。 “公共利益”的定义如此广泛,连“导致公众对任何政府机构的信心减弱”都得严加防范。 甚至这些部长或公务员不需要聆听相关人员或机构的解释,就可以发出指示,“违规者”要做的,就只能服从,否则面对严苛的罚款或坐牢刑罚。但是,若当权者决策时有判断失误,却不必然要负责。 虽然在防止假消息法条文中,有提及个人如果不满意部长发出的更正指示,可以对部长上诉。可是又有哪位部长愿意承认自己的判断失误? 律政部长还坚称,法庭会是最终的仲裁者,但依据司法的精神,为何不把法庭的裁决权限放在首位或至少第二位?…

Netizens poke fun at Malaysian Home Minister’s choice to seek treatment at a hospital in Singapore

Malaysia Prime Minister and cabinet members dropped into a hospital in Singapore…

SCDF NS serviceman allegedly committed suicide because of stress

According to a Facebook post* by one of his friends, a Singapore…