Breaking News:
Bernard Madoff, who was charged with defrauding thousands of investors in the US of some US$65 billion, has been handed a 150-year jail term. (BBC
)

Billboards and banners at various parts of S’pore last year

Andrew Loh

It is that time of year again, as National Day approaches, when our Members of Parliament show their patriotism. To do so, billboards and bannerettes are springing up all over the island, as they did in previous years. They are huge, colourful and according to some, an eyesore. Also, they cost quite a bit of money.

In a time of Singapore’s worse recession in its history, where thousands are out of job and struggling to survive, one would have to question if such ostentatious show of patriotism is necessary.

In a Straits Times report on 29 June 2009, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong said that “low-income families approaching the CDCs have increased by about 40 per cent” and, in another report on the same day, the Finance Ministry revealed that “more than 780,000 HDB households will receive $60 million of utility rebates in July.”

Clearly, Singaporeans are finding it tough to cope with living costs.

It was not too long ago that PAP-run town councils were found to have invested in toxic financial products and had lost S$16 million in the process. In a bid to dismiss the losses as small or insignificant, the government revealed that the PAP-run town councils have accumulated, over the last 20 years, S$2 billion worth of reserves in their sinking funds. (Channel NewsAsia)

This writer wrote to the Ang Mo Kio – Yio Chu Kang Town Council last year to ask about the cost of the billboards and the bannerettes. The reply from the town council was that “the total cost of each billboard is $3,300”. The town council said it paid for one billboard “per division/SMC and the rest are borne by the respective CCC through their own fund raising.” The cost of electricity for the spotlights which lights up the boards at night costs S$100 (for two months) for each billboard. The town council had put up 7 billboards in the AMK-YCK constituency but said that “for the rest, we leave it to the CCCs to install at their own costs.” It had also installed 1,336 bannerettes in the area.

While we may understand that MPs would like to celebrate National Day and show their patriotism and solidarity with the nation, we should also question if such spending is necessary, especially in these uncertain times.

In Aljunied GRC constituency, the town council has even introduced electronic LCD screens on its notice boards at the void decks. (See picture, below). Is this necessary?

LCD at an Aljunied void deck notice board

Would it not be more prudent and helpful for the town councils to use the funds spent on these billboards to help families which are struggling with utilities bills and service and conservancy charges instead?

In an interview with the Straits Times two days ago, on 27 June 2009, Senior Minister Goh Chok Tong lamented that residents still do not feel they have a stake in the governance of their estates and that there was a “missing link” in the relationship between the town councils and residents. Indeed, his fellow PAP member, Mr Lim Boon Heng, felt that “we have not yet imbued the sense of personal and collective responsibility in the residents.” (Straits Times)

One would, instead, question the sense of responsibility of the town councils in how they are spending funds collected from residents.

Finally, commenting on the town councils’ investments in December last year, Minister of Health, Mr Khaw Boon Wan also defended the town councils from accusations of being non-transparent in how they spent their funds.  “It’s absolutely transparent,” he said, “because this is not a secret society activity where there is secrecy and so on.” (AsiaOne)

The Online Citizen would thus like to encourage our readers and all Singaporeans to write to their respective MPs and ask about the costs of putting up the billboards and bannerettes (and for Aljunied residents, the cost and necessity of the LCDs).

Also, we welcome our readers to take pictures of these and send them to us at [email protected] and the replies they may receive from their town councils.

—-

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

【选举】民主党倡议援助失业者方案 应对后冠病时代危机

新加坡民主党指出,在该党的“重新启动RESTART”援助和重新雇佣计划下,被裁员的员工将获得临时援助金,让他们创业,扭转我国的经济结构,强化国家企业家文化。 民主党秘书长徐顺全在脸书帖文,指出该党所推出的“重启”计划,能够协助被裁退的国人,让他们能够透过该援助金重新振作,甚至创业。 他表示,该党非常关注我国的就业机会和失业率课题,并对目前的政策感到失望。 他指出,透过“重启”计划,被裁国人能够持续18个月获得原薪金的一半援助金,即即首半年提供原先工资的75巴仙,第二半年提供一半的工资,以及最后的半年提供原工资的四分一。 “若被裁员工能够找到另外九名面对同样命运的国人,他们可以透过提交可行的商业计划书,一次性领出所有援助金,作为合作企业的资本。” 该计划也会就合作企业的类型制定广泛的指南,并设立独立机构进行监督,以防遭滥用,更可以引用法定指南,让董事会和管理层承担责任。 他指出,此做法已经在意大利率先被提出,被称为马可拉法(Marcora Law),帮助被裁退的人们重新振作,并鼓励国人创业。类似的合作企业为会员所拥有和管理,将有助于新加坡市场的经济包容性和多元化。 徐顺全指出,我国在“裙带资本主义”指数中,排位偏高,是不健康且不可持续的现象。因此他希望自冠状病毒19疫情后的复苏时期,我国能够摆脱政府主导的国内经济,真正调整我国的经济结构,让私营部门取到关键作用,加强国家的企业家文化。

Gan: I feel we can afford to be more flexible for “severely disabled” SGs to withdraw cash from CPF

It was reported in the news today (4 Jul) that CPF members…

90% vaccination rate could bring down the number of cases “quite significantly”: Prof Tambyah on living with COVID-19

Living with COVID-19 means accepting that it has become an endemic and…