It has been 20 years since town councils were instituted to take charge of the running of HDB estates. Previously, estates were run by the Housing and Development Board. Town councils were, it was initially hoped, suppose to “function as a form of local government and give residents more say in the estate they live in”, as reported in the Straits Times of 27 June 2009.

However, 20 years on, Senior Minister Goh Chok Tong, in an interview with the Straits Times, admits there is a “missing link” between residents and their town councils. He was referring to the devolvement of governance of the estate, “to give them (residents) a stake in the process of governance”.

SM Goh said:

I would not say that the direct link has been forged yet between residents and the Town Councils. But Town Councils have been successful in getting the grassroots leaders to understand the linkage between what Town Councils can do and what the people must do.

Mr Lim Boon Heng concurred, saying, “We have not yet imbued the sense of personal and collective responsibility in the residents.”

What are your views of your town council?

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Singapore Gov’t to bear cost of vaccinating selected cargo drivers from Malaysia; those drivers exempted from daily on-arrival testing

Malaysia cargo drivers who have received their two doses of COVID-19 vaccine…

【选举】对林绍权人品提质疑 爆料者欢迎王瑞杰向他了解详情

人民行动党本月24日,宣布吉宝岸外与海事总经理的林绍权(42岁)成为该党候选人之一,不料却引来坊间反弹,更有网民踢爆他是精英主义者,也称林在新加坡武装部队服务时“表现得高高在上”,与表面朴实形象不符合。 随着行动党第一助理秘书长王瑞杰,呼吁林绍权应站出来为自己澄清,后者也终于在今午(27日)打破沉默,发声明指一些指责“是无证据的,包括自己也没涉及吉宝岸外与海事集团在巴西的贿赂案件。” 不过对于军中事件,他指“不同人对事件会有不同看法”。有者指他需晚上10时报到,但一般惯例是晚上11时59分。 “我想要解释的是,那一次部队人员隔天清晨5时得提早出外训练,因此按照规定,我必须确保大家有充足的休息,所以才会要求部下在前一晚10时报到。” 不过网民似乎仍不买账,指林绍权的回应似乎未直面问题,无法令人信服;再者,许多批评者都是以真账号作出指责,相信事出必有因。 其中一名爆料者更直接点名王瑞杰,欢迎后者任何时候找他,他会站稳自己表达的声明,并直接与林绍权对质。 “我希望我们的谈话记录在案,并公开予举国同胞,毕竟我们都意识到,核实候选人人品的重要。”

HDB and GIRO deductions

By Zephyr Mansor – Letter to the Editor I would like to…

过去个资泄露事故前车之鉴 人民党疑虑政府推出穿戴式配备

早前,主管智慧国计划的外交部长维文,宣称首批“合力追踪”穿戴式配备将在本月下旬推出,他也指出还配备不是追踪器,设备无网络连接性或卫星定位晶片,当局须取得确诊者同意,才能索取数据。 他强调穿戴式配备不会追踪使用者的位置。 不过,人民党副秘书长Ariffin Sha针对有关穿戴式配备表达疑虑,呼吁政府应当谨慎处理新加坡人的隐私,也提及过去政府曾有数次大型的数据泄露事故: 2018年新保集团150万病患资料被盗,其中16万住院治疗记录外泄,堪称历年来最严重,卫生部长颜金勇甚至特别为此事致歉。 2019年:1万4200名艾滋病病患,姓名、身份证号码、电话号码、住址和相关医疗资料等遭泄露。卫生部长颜金勇再度道歉。 2019年3月:卫生科学局(HSA)透露,超过80万名捐血者的姓名、身份证号码、性别和血性等个人资料,被挂上有互联网连接的服务器长达九个星期,面临资料疏漏风险。 该党认为,尽管疫情当前,惟不应正当化对民众隐私的干预,再者,配备仍会记录私人的数据,若落在不法之徒手上遭滥用是很危险的。该党为此呼吁政府寻求其他更合适的方案。