From Straits Times:

Oversights include failure to seek bids for contract and letting six chalets go to waste.

A $26 MILLION decision by the National Heritage Board (NHB) has been called into question by a parliamentary committee.

The Public Accounts Committee (PAC) has rejected the board’s reasons for giving a $26 million contract to an existing contractor instead of putting it out for open competition.

This was among 11 lapses at ministries and statutory boards that were probed by the PAC after they were spotted by the Auditor-General, Mr Lim Soo Ping.

Another was at the Ministry of Defence (Mindef), which gave a contract to a sub-contractor that had been blacklisted by the public sector.

The PAC described these oversights in its latest annual report released yesterday.

It said the NHB’s $26 million contract was for the construction of exhibition galleries at the National Museum. Two years earlier, it had given a $7.75 million contract to a company to design the galleries.

The board explained that it had given this designing company the additional $26 million worth of contract work to avoid any delay.

Calling for tenders would have delayed by eight months the December 2006 opening of the redeveloped National Museum, it said.

Also, the designer’s price for the additional works was within the board’s budget and very few contractors could do such specialised and complex construction, it told the PAC.

Do you know of other instances of wasteful spending by the stat boards? Write in to us at [email protected].

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Little India riot – Public Order Bill hasty and reactive, say activists

MEDIA RELEASE Singapore, 10 February 2014 – A group of prominent civil…

Singaporeans need to be more empathetic towards the current political turmoil in Malaysia, says NUS’s Assoc Prof

Today (3 March), Associate Professor of political science at the National University…

李总理称99年屋契对下一代公平 网民问“我是买屋还是租屋?”

在本周日举行的国庆群众大会,我国总理李显龙发表演说,公布数项旨在减轻民众生活经济负担的政策。 对于民众最为关注的房屋课题,他再一次阐明公共组屋地契,为何定在99年。对他而言,99年是很长时间,即使传给孩子,到屋契到期时孩子也有80-90岁。 “当住户在同样组屋住了3、40年至退休。仍有60年屋契,仍保持良好价值,您可以选择积蓄住在该组屋,或出租增加收入,或者传承给下一代,也可以转售并购买较小的单位。” 他保证组屋99年屋契到期,不代表住户无家可归,政府会协助您找其他的组屋,可能是全新99年屋契的预购屋,或二房式灵活组屋计划供退休用。总是能根据您的需求找到合适的选择。 为下一代腾出居住空间 “但不论是哪一种选择,您必须为组屋租赁付费。这是公平的,因为你知道租约什么时候用完、什么时候必须交回给建屋局。”李显龙坚称,这是为了对下一代表示公平,您“拥有了”一间组屋,传了一两代,之后就要交回给政府,由政府重新规划,为未来世代建新的组屋。 如果政府发放永久地契,屋主可以把房子传承给许多代,但是很快我们就不够土地空间建新房子。这将导致社会被分化成拥屋一群和无能力置产的一群,这是真正的不平等。即便是私人物业,政府也只发放99年屋契。” 不过,我们也不能发现,李总理仍坚称人民是“购买”组屋,我们“拥有”一间组屋,可以传承一两代。但很肯定地,99年屋契到期,就必须交给政府重新规划。 网民Jasper Lam虽认同不应有永久地契,因为屋龄到了90年,住户也不太敢住下去。但他也提出,政府应让人民清楚屋龄和地契的重要,让价格照着屋龄走,避免人民为了买老房子,也不需付出高昂的代价。 “政府一直不愿指出这个大问题,因为影响很深,或许会影响选票”,价值多年来政府的论调都是组屋能保值、不贬值,澄清后就形同致歉的谎言被捅破。 Jasper…

【冠状病毒19】8月24日新增51例确诊 七例入境病例

根据卫生部文告,截至本月24日中午12时,本地新增51例冠病19确诊,七例入境病例。 一例社区病例,是本国公民。 本地累计确诊已增至5万6404例。 七例入境病例在入境我国后履行居家通知,当局仍在收集病例详情,并将在晚间公布。