Tan Kin Lian / Columnist

Just pumping funds into the economy will not do. It is also important to curb unemployment, and Singapore can do this by creating new “Economic Recovery” jobs.

Being an open economy, Singapore has been badly affected by the global recession with a severe contraction of the economy in 2009. Many people have lost their jobs.

There is an urgent need to create new “economic recovery” jobs for these displaced workers and new job seekers.

Examples of these jobs are teaching assistants in schools, health care assistants in hospitals, carers to look after children, elderly, disabled and the sick, customer service assistants in train stations, bus terminus, town centers and neighborhoods.

These assistants can reduce the stress from employed people who now have to spend work longer hours to keep their jobs.

I hope that the money that is set aside in the Jobs Credit Scheme can be used to create these “economic recovery” jobs to improve short term employment to large numbers of people and tide them over until the recovery of the global economy.

Availability and Security of Employment

There is now widespread recognition that the key to recovery is the availability, security and fair terms of employment. If people feel secure about their employment, they can continue to spend according to their capacity.

This will create a stable economy that works efficiently and creates the right balance of work and leisure that can give a satisfactory standard of life for the people.

It was once thought that the free market was the best mechanism to ensure that the right goods and services are produced and to give employment to people according to their skills. The global recession has shown the weakness of the free market.

Being largely unregulated, it has attracted large numbers of talented people to work in financial services that was creating false wealth. This system has now largely collapsed.

The free market is now not able to generate the new demand that will create employment for the large number of displaced workers and new entrants to the job market.

To solve this problem, we need a new source of employment, which can only be provided through the public sector. The state has to create new “economic recovery” jobs in the public sector and to build infrastructure.

President Barack Obama recognizes this role for the state. His administration is giving top priority to make this happen quickly. He is employing more teachers, more people to maintain state facilities and similar jobs.

Some people will argue that these public sector jobs may not be the best use of the human resources that can be better utilized in the private sector. This may be true in a few years time, when the economy has returned to good health.

Fair Terms of Employment

A good approach is to make these “economic recovery” jobs pay a minimum wage (and not a generous wage) and be for a term of two or three years only. When the economy is able to generate better paying jobs, the workers can abandon these “economic recovery” jobs and move to the private sector jobs.

The key is to make jobs available to anyone who is willing to work at a minimum wage or higher.

In a weak job market, workers can be exploited with low wages, even by companies that are operating profitably. Unemployed workers will be willing to get a job at any wage. The wages of the existing employed workers will also come under pressure.

If the workers do not get adequate wages, they will reduce their spending, causing delay in the recovery of the economy.

Therefore it is important to ensure that all jobs should give a minimum wage. If there is a supply of “economic recovery” jobs at this minimum age, it will set a floor on the wages in the free market. This will give the confidence to workers to have optimism in the future.

Stimulus spending not enough

In normal times, the free market works well in matching supply and demand and provides choices for people to find suitable jobs and to spend their income on products that best serve their needs.

A major shock, such as the global financial crisis, can cause many people to lose their jobs with a severe impact on the economy. Unemployed people have to curtail their spending. This caused other people to lose their jobs due to reduced demand. Even the supply of credit gets disrupted as bankers become more careful.

The economic experts did not foresee the severity of the collapse of Lehman Brothers on the global economy. If they knew, they would not have allowed this bank to fail.

Its failure has caused so much damage that it needed several trillions of dollars of stimulus spending in America, China and other countries, to stabilize and restore the global system. Even Singapore added its share of stimulus.

There is still much uncertainty regarding the positive contribution of the stimulus packages on the economy. Unemployment continues to rise. Consumer demand continues to fall, although at a slower pace. Economists are worried that these packages will take a long time to work, and recovery will be a slow and painful process.

Not a Planned Economy

Some people will perceive that I am suggested a centrally planned economy, where economic planners or bureaucrats decide on the number of people to be employed in each occupation and the wages to be paid for each occupation.

I am not advocating such a system.

I am suggesting that state should ensure that jobs will always be available at the minimum wage level to any person who is willing to work on these terms for a temporary period. This will provide competition to the private sector to produce goods and services of better value to consumers and be able to pay higher wages.

This will help to make the market economy work more efficiently by reducing exploitation and wastefulness, and giving workers the confidence to consumer according to their stable level of income.

You May Also Like

MOH preliminarily confirms additional 548 cases of COVID-19 infection; Total tally at 31,616

As of Sunday noon (24 May), the Ministry of Health (MOH) has…

More unemployed? How many more?

Uncle Leong asks “when will Singaporeans unemployment and jobs data be “un-secretised””?

柯文哲:从未说过要参选 “选完市长参选总统不是正常国家该有现象”

台北市长柯文哲医生声称,对于2020年台湾总统大选,从头到尾都没说过要去参选,对参选的意愿本来就不高。 他在今日上载受访视频,声明中他指出“我的主观认为,刚选完市长就马上就投入总统大选,这不是一个正常国家应该有的现象。我也认为,这会影响整个市政的进行。” 他解释,自己不想去参选总统,是因为手头上仍有有一万户的公宅在开工;以及市场等项目要开工或完工进驻,这些工程总加就超过200多亿元(逾8亿新元),“有很多理由,让市政跟总统大选没有办法同时去兼顾。” 柯文哲也在今年创立了台湾民众党。 他认为要相信自己的口号,即“改变台湾从首都开始,改变台北从文化开始”,可以藉由把台北做好影响整个台湾。 “蓝绿意识形态对决少政见” “我从一个素人来当台北市长,我非常清楚,其实当台北市长的前两年非常非常的辛苦,因为都搞不清楚状况,一直到第三年第四年才比较顺利,其实我现在如果选上了总统,我相信整个故事又要重演一遍,前两年会非常辛苦,对整个状况没办法掌握那么好。” 他也不忘批评,如今蓝绿诉诸意识形态的对决,很少在谈政见,大都谈如何赢得选举,从没有候选人告诉选民,如果他当选后,台湾会变什么样子。 柯文哲认为台湾当前仍需解决的是国家治理、讲究KPI,而鸿海集团创办人郭台铭当初表达参选意愿,他还特别为他取了“台湾重开机”的口号。不过,他相信郭考虑的层面也更复杂,对于郭宣布不选,也表示尊重。   抨击议席过半执政党选前撒币政策 对于当前政局,他认为场总统大选,会回归到蓝绿对决的局势,那就更凸显在国会力求三党不过半的重要性。而目前执政党过半,反而造成人事浮滥酬庸,特别在选前太多大撒币的政策,欠缺财政纪律。…

Women’s rights in Brunei are highly threatened

Brunei’s new Syariah Penal Code Order 2013 has provisions that clearly infringe…