Jonathan Koh

Reena Rajasvari, 50, has been visually impaired for twenty-two years. Struck by glaucoma – a group of diseases that damaged her optic nerve – she gradually lost her vision in both eyes when she was 28. From afar, however, no one would suspect she is any different from able-bodied people. Her gait is steady and upright, and she wears a huge smile. She answers questions eloquently and speaks with passion. She has been pursuing this cause of granting transport concessions for the disabled since 1999. In 2000, she approached a Member of Parliament to help her speak to SMRT.

“I thank the government and transport operators for giving us the best transport system”, she says, addressing the 60 odd people who turned up at the event at Hong Lim Park. “But how can we use (the transport system) if there is no concession?” Most of the disabled people are either not working, or in the low income group, she says, clarifying that they are “not asking for free (transport), just subsidies” and concessions to ease their burden – this being especially important in the current economic crisis.

Hefty transport costs

Reena (picture, left) is actually one of the more fortunate disabled people who are employed. Her telemarketing job earns her around $700 a month. But she has to travel to work by taking two buses and the train, spending over $200 in transport fares each month, around 30% of the wages she earns.

Another visually impaired speaker, Junaidah Ramli, adds that “the cost of living is very high” in Singapore. As such, she hopes that “the transport operators will hear (them) out”.

She also urges transport operators to be “more helpful to guide disabled people”. There was once a bus driver, in his attempt to help her up the bus, took away her cane, making her ‘disoriented’. Handicapped by her inability to see, she occasionally takes the cab, paying even $50 on one occasion. She earns “$300 and below” every month.

Responses from public transport operators

The fight for transport concessions is not likely to be easy though. SMRT operator’s reply to Reena in 2000 was: we have to be “prudent about extending any travel concessions beyond the present eligible groups” because “concession fares are cross-subsidized by full-fare paying passengers with no direct subsidy”. In short, SMRT’s reply was ‘no’.

Organizer Challengeds’ Alliance Network’s (CAN!) spokesman Ravi Philemon says that it is “unfair that the disabled, already earning so little, have to pay as much as an (able-bodied) adult person”. He notes that concessions are already being given to the elderly and NSmen and there are no reasons why it cannot also be given to the disabled. He hopes that once the petition is forwarded to the Minister of Transport, more can be done to help the disabled.

TOC understands that SBS Transit, a private bus operator, is already looking into offering concession fares to commuters with physical disabilities. Though no firm proposals have been drawn up, it is likely that such concessions, if granted, will not be extended to the visually or hearing impaired. Whilst Reena acknowledges that some bus drivers ‘give concessions out of compassion’ to the blind people, this practice is technically not legal.

She says that “many disabled people are hence not coming out of their house” due to the heavy cost of transport, becoming ‘disconnected’ as a result.

Other woes

Other than feeling the pinch of paying unsubsidised transport fares, the disabled also find it hard to obtain employment, especially so in this economic downturn. For Wong U-Wen, who is hearing impaired, his job search which started mid-April last month has been particularly ‘frustrating’.

He has studied, lived and worked in the United States for the past 20 years, serving the Center for Disability Rights in upstate New York. When his H1B visa (a non-immigrant visa that allows US employers to hire foreign employees in highly specialised occupations) expired, his employer did not have enough time to apply for the US green card on his behalf. He had to return to Singapore.

In response to a question I wrote on my notepad, “What kind of job are you  looking for?”, he writes briefly: “Whatever I can get. As long as I can do the job to the best of my abilities.” 

Offering help as an individual

1.     If you believe that the disabled should be given public transport concessions, you can pen your signature here: 

2.     Also, a research and advocacy group is working on a project which aims to derive practical solutions to the problems the disabled face in Singapore. This group is currently working on research right now, and really needs to know what the people with disabilities or their friends/families have to say about the current situation and problems. Suggestions, opinions, support and criticism are all welcome. Please email your responses to [email protected] and kindly help to spread the word.”

—-

For more pictures, visit TOC’s Facebook here.

—-

 

 

 

 

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

One new confirmed case of Covid-19 in Singapore : Three previous cases discharged

As of 20 February 2020, 12 pm, the Ministry of Health (MOH)…

人民协会:加强防疫措施 明日妆艺大游行如期举行

2020妆艺大游行主办单位官方脸书今日(30日)发通告,有关游行仍会如期在明日(1月31日)指2月1日举行。 通告称人民协会将监督情况,并与相关机构合作和更新资讯。当局表示将根据本地新型冠状病毒进展,酌量更动或取消活动。 人协表示现场将进行体温检测、投入更多医护人员到场协助。 “我们呼吁群众保持警惕,并维持良好个人卫生习惯,如有不适应立即就医和呆在家休息。”当局也指出如在活动现场有人出现不适,可立即寻求现场工作人员求助。 根据《8视界》报导,人协总执行理事长陈国明则表示,希望透过设立体温检测站等措施,能给观众安全感。表演者也每天有接受体温检测,表演当天也会量体温。 预计明后天的妆艺大游行,一天人流量可达到逾万人。

金管局推7500万元补贴 鼓励企业上市 培养金融分析人才

新加坡金融管理局将在下月推出总值7500万元的新加坡资本市场津贴(Grant for Equity Market Singapore,简称GEMS),以刺激陷入交易吸引力下降的新加坡股市,恢复增长。 根据金管局文告,有关津贴措施将在下月14日生效,为期三年,旨在协助企业降低上市成本、透过上市来筹集资金。此举也符合我国作为亚洲资本筹集和企业融资中心的愿景。 有关津贴计划分为三大部分: 上市补助:补贴部分首次公开募股(IPO)成本,鼓励企业在新加坡交易所(SGX)上市; 研究人才补助:协助培养并保留分析师人才 研究计划补助:提供资金支持本地股票分析市场的发展。 在该措施下,在新兴科技领域、市场价值最少三亿元的公司,将可获得高达70巴仙、但不超过100万元的上市费用资助。 投资高增长领域、市值最少三亿元的公司,可获得20巴仙、不超过50万元的补助。制造业、物流、枢纽服务、城市方案与基础设施、保健等领域的企业都可受惠。…

Singapore Democratic Party's 3rd Rally Speech videos

Videos of the speeches by speakers from Singapore Democratic Party at the…