The government’s views on the unemployment situation might be too sanguine

With Singapore in the throes of its worst ever downturn, the government seems to have gotten into the habit of implying that Singaporeans are complacent and choosy about employment opportunities, something exemplified by manpower minister Gan Kim Yong’s invocation to young graduates to take any job that is available – even if it happens to be a blue-collared one that they did not train for – several weeks ago.

Such a sentiment is not borne out by statistics.  One indicator is a global survey published in April ranking Singaporeans as being the second-most dissatisfied group of workers worldwide, with just over half claiming to be satisfied with their jobs, which could be an indicator of how undemanding they are about job choice.  A more telling poll conducted by the Institute of Public Study (IPS) in February indicated that 31% would “take any job regardless of pay” if they were jobless, with the respondents saying that they were prepared to take up to a 42% wage cut on average to get a job.

The IPS survey also showed that Singaporeans were anything but complacent: only a small proportion expected to rely on the government (7% of respondents) or welfare agencies (5%) to see them through the bad times, and Singaporeans on average had built up a reserve of 8½ months of savings for such contingencies.

The problem is not one of Singaporeans being choosy, but that jobs are genuinely getting scarce.  The latest data from the manpower ministry show that the unemployment rate (unadjusted) for residents hit a five-year high of 4.4% in March. (Source: MOM). Already, this is almost 5 times the number of immediate job vacancies available at the Employment and Employability Institute.

Furthermore, the figure probably understates the actual economic pain.  For one, it excludes those who have given up “actively” looking for work, which anecdotal accounts suggest could include quite a few older workers who were laid off and effectively forced into early retirement after not being able to secure other jobs.  It also excludes those who are in “retraining” under the gamut of government-sponsored schemes: the prime minister said in his May Day rally that 80,000 workers (which is close to the current number of unemployed residents) from 1,300 companies will be participating in its SPUR retraining programme, which is a fair guide to the degree of under-employment in the economy.

Yet despite the worsening outlook, it seems that Singaporeans know that they should not expect much government help.  82% of the respondents in the IPS survey said that they had to rely on personal initiative rather than the government.  Significantly, 62% said that the government’s measures have had no impact on them; even for those in the lower income groups, which the government was supposedly targeting with its measures, only 4 out of 10 said that they benefited, a figure not much higher than the overall average among all income groups of 3 out of 10.

That might come as a rude shock to a government that had seemed convinced that it was doing a good job of spreading largesse around.  The IPS survey has given a hint of the pain threshold of Singaporeans: on the whole they are currently still cushioned by their savings as well as government re-training programmes, but if the economy does not bottom out fairly soon their patience might become sorely taxed.

 —-

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Chinese migrant worker attempts suicide for not being able to pay S$2,000 ticket to return to China

A video went viral yesterday (22 July) as it was circulating on…

【冠状病毒19】再有确诊病例到访穆斯达法购物中心

卫生部指出,再有冠状病毒19确诊病例到穆斯达法购物中心,因此呼吁曾于同一时段出现在当地的民众密切关注自身的健康状况。 卫生部昨晚(6月18日)发出的文告显示,曾有确诊病例于6月10日晚上8时05分到穆斯达法购物中心,直到9时45分才离去。 当局已经向与确诊病例有亲密接触者发出通知,也促请曾于该段时间出现在穆斯达法购物中心的人士,若出现急性呼吸道感染性症状、或发烧、或失去味觉或嗅觉,请尽快求医,并告知医生曾到过的地点。

17-year-old male dies after falling from 4th floor of Orchard Central Mall

A 17-year-old man passed away from his injuries after he fell from the…

新加坡保安协会质疑评估制 吁当局改善现有评估标准

新加坡保安协会发表措辞强烈声明,对政府最新的保安机构评估结果持质疑态度,认为当局有必要改善评估标准和方法。 该协会代表国内180个保安机构。协会执行董事依山(Ikhsan)认为,评估结果获得A级与B级的保安机构,都和去年相仿,可能给予外界印象,认为他们并没有进步。 保安协会认为,现有制度根据钟形曲线(bell curve)评级,但尽管总得分95以上的机构有增长三分之一,惟仅63家机构能获得A评级。 针对上述协会的声明,内政部则在昨日傍晚回应,指评估制一项透明,所有保安机构都清楚,再者更改评估制也有是咨询过业界,且事先知会各机构。 自从2009年推行以来,该评估制协助提升保安业的专业和水准;大部分业者都维持和提升评估表现,至于连年表现欠佳者责备吊销执照。 政府在去年起调整保安业分级制评估标准,旨在针对这些保安机构表现,进行独立的年度评估。这些评估类别分为:程序(35巴仙)、人员(22巴仙)、系统与科技(20巴仙)、雇佣制度(15巴仙)以及反恐(8巴仙)。 评级具商业意义  客户货比三家 今年共有235家保安机构参与评估,多达63家获得A级(26.81巴仙)、105家获B评级(44.68巴仙)以及64家得到C评级。仅3家保安机构获得D级。 依山也补充,评级对于保安机构具有商业意义,客户会根据评级货比三家。 保安员的处境…