Report by Jewel Philemon / Pictures by Wallace Woon

‘Is health-care and sanitation a basic right?’  A Special Interest Group (SIG) from the Raffles Community Leadership Forum (RCLF) seem to think that these basic human rights are denied to the physically disabled. The students, who gathered at Speakers’ Corner today, were there to create awareness about the plight of the disadvantaged and disabled in Singapore.

Ten SIG who were concerned about issues ranging from intellectual disability to urban poverty, from youths at risk to environmentalism, and from animal welfare to dating violence, gathered at Hong Lim park on an extremely hot Sunday afternoon to. The title of their event was, “Speak, Act and Change”. It is a prelude to the RCLF which will be held in June of this year.

Santosi Buvaneswarran, 18, said, “It is extremely important for young people to speak up as we are tomorrow’s decision makers. We are the leaders of tomorrow. We, the new generation must not only care about the society, but also contribute to it.”

In illustrating this, Santoshi’s SIG, which advocated for the rights of the intellectually disabled, spoke about society’s misconception about the intellectually disabled. The public’s false ideas may have come from the fact that the intellectually disabled have received minimum education. Currently, her team said, the unemployment rate for the intellectually disabled stands at a whopping 72%.

Her team argued impressively that due to this public misconception, those who are intellectually disabled are often not accepted by others.  Santosi’s team asks passionately, “Why are they treated differently? We have made this gap. We need to bridge this gap. We need to bring them into our society.”

“What makes a bully?” asked a SIG advocating for the Youths at Risks.  They said that statistics show that one out of two bullies were victims of bullies themselves.  The students described the average youth at risk as a carefree person who has no respect or responsibility towards anything or anyone; and someone who has no future.  The SIG says that these youths are at risk, even to the point of engaging in violence and premarital sex because they are usually ostracised; that they wait to be understood and to be shown friendship.  It is all an effort in being ‘cool’ and in being accepted, they said, and the SIG pleaded, “Don’t discriminate!”

The topic then turned to chickens when the SIG for animal welfare took to the stage.  They spoke up against ‘Farm Factories’, the mistreatment and cruelty meted out to these voiceless farm animals.  The SIG claimed that movies like ‘Babe’ and ‘Charlotte’s Web’ glossed over the reality of cruelty meted out to farm animals.

The SIG which spoke up for the elderly said that many young in our society think that to be old is a disablity.  They said that the real disability is the uncaring society towards the old.  They asked, “Shouldn’t we treat the old equally and tailor projects and products to meet their needs?”

“He said cruel things to me but I know he loves me, because he sent me flowers today.He hit me but I know he loves me because he sent me flowers today.” The narration by two members of the SIG group advocating against dating violence related an example of how sending flowers after an escalation of violence seemed to make matters better for one girl. But the narration ended with, “Today is a special day. It is my funeral. He finally killed me. He sent me flowers today.”  Through the imaginative skit and the accompanying speech, they asked those that are going through dating violence to call the available hotlines, counselling services and women’s shelters.

The SIG who spoke against child abuse said that there is reportedly a 70%  increase in child abuses in Singapore. The group quoted Dr. Vivian Balakrishnan, the Minister for Community Development, Youth & Sports, “One child abused is one too many!”

Yi Jun and Janice spoke up for their SIG to advocate against urban poverty.  They pleaded for social safety nets to be strengthened and to protect the young who had to cut their education short to go to low-paying jobs so that they could support their families.  They urged, “Hear the plea of the poor!”

Mr. Gene Kam, the person in-charge of all the SIGs, made an impromptu call to Mr. Ravi Philemon, a community worker, to share and summarise the event, saying that the youths of today need role-models and some people to look up to.  Mr. Philemon said that speaking is difficult but that if you really believed, you need to speak, that acting is much more difficult than speaking but that we all must “walk the talk”, and he said that when one walks the talk, change will come.  He asked the student advocates to persevere even if change seems slow in coming. 

Mr Leong Sze Hian, a Rafflesian alumni and author of the book, ‘Issues that matter in uniquely Singapore. F1 or F9’, who was there to support the Raffles Community Leaders, said, “In the past, there weren’t such avenues to speak up. Mostly there was the interact club or helping the elderly group, so this event definitely is a landmark and Raffles is the first school to encourage such events. The fact that it is held at a public venue such as Speakers’ Corner is really symbolic.”

As a final act of demonstrating and creating awareness the Raffles Community Leaders and the SIGs spray-painted their concerns and advocacy on a black canvass.  As they were doing this, Vidhya, Linli and Sihui, all 17, said that the government would surely respond to their earnest pleas, but more importantly “it will influence future government decisions”.

—–

Jewel Philemon is a home-schooled 16 year old student, who aspires to be a journalist.

—-

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

尚穆根指有外力干预 许渊臣:《网络公民》从未接受任何国外款项

今早(25日),在南洋理工大学拉惹勒南国际关系研究院(RSIS),内政部长兼律政部长尚穆根出席有关外来干预策略与对应措施的研讨会,尚穆根声称新加坡在一定程度上已经面对外来势力的干预。 他认为政府不能采取放任做法,新加坡需要制定自己的法律来应对,并及时干预和调查敌意信息宣传(hostile information campaign)等威胁。 他更点名历史学者覃炳鑫和自由新闻工作者韩俐颖等人(还有流亡前学运领袖陈华彪律师),在去年8月30日前往马来西亚吉隆坡拜会马国首相敦马,吁请马哈迪带头把民主带到新加坡等东南亚国家。 然而,在当时陈华彪等人都已声明,是作为立场不同的新加坡非政府人物,希望了解敦马对马新未来关系的看法,并邀请他出席一项有关深化民主基础课题的演讲。 此外,尚穆根不忘挑起,覃炳鑫与韩俐颖也曾联名申请成立公司,但使用外国资金在新加坡推动民主和人权等课题。 指《网络公民》聘外国人撰写负面文章 他也点名本社,聘用外国人撰写有关新加坡政治的负面文章,包括一些可破坏社会凝聚力的煽动性文章。 他声称,有关”攻击总理李显龙人格“的文章,据公开信息显示,就出自马国人之手,而他质疑,究竟是谁付薪水给她以及有什么目的。 有关文章目前正面对诉讼,不过他表示他并非对有关文章的法律事项发表评论,惟他想指出有马国作者撰写这些文章。他也质问,本社的(脸书)14名管理员中,有九位都不在新加坡,“我们不知道他们是谁,他们是新加坡人吗?” 他也指出,“一些新闻网站”有不知名的供稿者这让他们可能受到外国利益影响,例如刊载煽动性文章攻击或加深分化。…

Understanding special children

By Ravi Philemon Some years ago when I was teaching in a…

Heng didn’t “study” Swiss pension system in his “study trip” to Switzerland

It was reported in the media that after Deputy Prime Minister Heng…

Man in Woodlands tasered by police after refusing to drop knife

A video of a man who got tasered by police officers after…