Announcement: The Online Citizen will bring you “live” updates from Suntec City tomorrow (Saturday) of the AWARE Extraordinary General Meeting. “Live” updates will begin from 12 noon. Stay tuned to TOC!

By Avery Chong, Gerald Giam, Nathaniel Koh, Watson Chong and Yaw Shin Leong

Singaporean workers are facing their most challenging period since Independence. Thousands have lost their jobs since the current economic crisis began last year, and unemployment is expected to continue rising through 2009 and beyond. Many workers have been forced to accept salary cuts or go on unpaid leave to help their companies stay profitable.

These workers should be saluted for their resilience, perseverance and adaptability in the face of enormous challenges. Singapore‘s prosperity and economic progress were achieved primarily through the sweat of our workers.

The Government always claims credit for Singapore‘s economic growth during good times, yet conveniently blames the global downturn when our economy takes a nosedive. However the facts tell a different story. Singapore was the first country in Asia to slip into recession last year. Our GDP is expected to contract 8.8% this year — much worse than almost all our major trading partners (see Annex A for the economic forecasts for our top trading partners).

The Government’s economic model may no longer be serving us well, and we need to start a national conversation to discuss alternative economic models to take Singapore to the next level of progress.

Closing the income gap

Singapore‘s economic growth over the last decade has resulted in phenomenal income increases for PAP ministers, “foreign talents” and top company executives, while the incomes of low wage Singaporean workers have stagnated or even fallen. Singapore‘s income inequality is now more in line with Third World countries than with other developed economies like Japan and Denmark.

Economic growth should benefit all Singaporeans, not just the rich and well-connected. While there should be fair rewards for hard work and good performance, the reality is that many ordinary Singaporeans work just as hard, if not harder, than their wealthy counterparts, but have not reaped commensurate rewards.

The Government should implement measures to increase the take home pay of low-wage local workers. This can be achieved through tighter restrictions on the import of foreign labour in domestic industries, skills development for higher value-added industries, productivity increases through capital investments and increasing government-funded income supplements.

The Goods and Services Tax (GST) for basic necessities like rice and sugar should be removed to benefit low-income Singaporeans. The GST should be reverted to its previous rate of 5% for all other goods and services, except luxury items.

While a no strings attached welfare state is undesirable, there is room for limited and conditional financial assistance for the unemployed. This financial assistance could be based on a fixed quantum or a proportion of the job seeker’s last drawn salary. It should not be disbursed solely at the discretion of Citizen’s Consultative Committees or Community Development Councils. It should be given for a limited period (e.g., six months) to all retrenched Singaporeans who demonstrate a commitment to looking for a new job.

Finally, wealthy Singaporeans should do their part to help their less fortunate countrymen through increased contributions to social welfare organisations and foundations that help Singaporeans in need.

We wish all our fellow Singaporean workers a Happy Labour Day!

——–
[1] The Economist Country Briefings (17 April 2009).

[2] Caught in the pay squeeze, Straits Times, 8 Jun 2008; MOM Report on Wages in Singapore 2006, p45.

[3] Singapore‘s Gini index is 42.5, similar to Thailand (42.0) and Cambodia (41.7). Gini index for Japan (24.9) and Denmark (24.7) are much better than Singapore’s. There are no developed countries that have a worse Gini index than Singapore (UNDP 2007/2008 Human Development Report).

——–

Annexe A

2009 GDP Growth Forecasts for Singapore’s top trading partners

 

 

Trading partner rank

Country/Region

Real GDP growth forecast (2009)

2

China

+6.0%

10

India

+5.0%

11

Australia

-1.2%

4

Indonesia

-1.9%

1

Malaysia

-3.0%

3

United States

-3.2%

13

United Kingdom

-3.8%

9

Thailand

-4.4%

12

Germany

-5.3%

6

Hong Kong

-5.9%

5

Japan

-6.4%

Singapore

-8.8%

7

Taiwan

-9.3%

8

South Korea

-10.1%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Source: IE Singapore and Economist Intelligence Unit

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

李嘉诚:黄台之瓜 何堪再摘

香港陷入长期抗争仍未消停,也引起香港首富李嘉诚关注,并以“一个香港市民”身份,在多家报章刊登广告,呼吁停止暴力。 据当地媒体报导,李嘉诚供刊登两则全版广告,其中一则中间写有被框住的“暴力”,象征反对暴力,而左右两边则写上:爱自由.爱包容.爱法治”,和“爱中国.爱香港.爱自己”。上头写着“最好的因可成最坏的果”,以及下方:“以爱之义,止息怒愤”。 至于另一则广告,则引用唐章怀太子李贤的名作黄台瓜辞,劝谕:“黄台之瓜,何堪再摘”,但未表明是呼吁任何人或组织不要再摘黄瓜。 “年轻人声音震耳欲聋” 李嘉诚发言人表示,刊登广告主要因为他认为香港长期繁荣稳定,系于“一国两制”行稳致远,今日香港要停止暴力,坚守法治,又指时间的长河看不到尽头,人生的路走不回头。 至于为何刊登两则不同广告,发言人则解释基于目前香港局势复杂,难以以单一语言或沟通方法回应,“应以何身得度者,即现何身而为之说法”,但是发言人声明也写道“现时年轻人给政府的声音和讯息震耳欲聋,政府已在绞尽脑汁。” 发言人也指投资青年就是投资未来,所以不会后悔把资源投放在青年身上,但又告诫不要让今天激情成为明天的遗憾。 《黄台瓜辞》全文为“种瓜黄台下,瓜熟子离离。一摘使瓜少,再摘使瓜稀。三摘犹自可,摘绝抱蔓归。” 李贤是武则天的二儿子,曾在兄长死后担任太子,但被武后废为庶人,黄台瓜辞便是感叹母子亲情在权力斗争下的变质,用黄台之瓜比喻唐代宗室,已不堪一再采摘,劝武后不要再对子女赶尽杀绝。但李贤最终仍被逼自杀。 回溯2016年,李嘉诚也同样曾以“黄台之瓜,何堪再摘”回应旺角警民冲突,但当时他未回应谁是损害香港的“摘瓜人”,仅呼吁港人以香港利益为重。 很快有网民诠释,李嘉诚的广告似乎“暗藏玄机”,揣测可能是“藏尾文”,若取每句尾字拼凑,成了“因果由国,容港治己”,以及“义愤民诚”。不过广告要表达的真实意义,恐怕只有李嘉诚本人最清楚。 李嘉诚今年已91岁,今年三月《福布斯》杂志公布全球富豪排名,李嘉诚净资产总值高达317亿美元,全球排名第28位。…

Shoes washed in food stall sink – Kopitiam sacks worker

Foodcourt chain, Kopitiam, has dismissed the worker whose act of washing her…

【冠状病毒19】印尼1千600志愿者 接种测试中国生产疫苗

今日(11日),邻国印尼有多达1600志愿者,将开始接种测试中国生产的冠状病毒19疫苗。 这款疫苗由中国医药公司北京科兴控股公司研发,进入第三阶段,仍待最后一道临床试验。 早前,该疫苗已在巴西完成9000志愿者的测试。 印尼目前由超过12万7千人确诊,死亡人数超过5千700人。至于上述疫苗测试将持续至明年2月份。若能被证实无风险且有效,当地政府将下令量产。

Pakatan Harapan’s internal chaos fuelling frictions between Malaysia and Singapore: Former Ambassador-at-Large Bilahari Kausikan

Singapore is being used as a scapegoat to divert attention from political…