The country is ill-equipped to cope with a possible rise in homelessness

In February this year, the grim reality of the economic downturn in the United States was dramatically brought home to Americans by the Oprah Winfrey Show when it highlighted a “tent-city” in Sacramento that had more than 150 residents.  Homelessness is a perennial bugbear in the US, but recently it has worsened markedly: various states have reported a surge in the number of people applying for shelter, from 40% in New York to 58% in Louisville.  The government has since been scrambling to cope with the deteriorating situation.

A similar situation could arise in Singapore, despite official pronouncements that “there are no homeless, destitute or starving people” in the country.  The reality is that there were homeless people even during the boom years, but official rectitude has made it difficult to estimate the numbers or to properly assess the cause of their homelessness.

The government’s stance on the issue is clear: a brief parliamentary debate in 2007 on the plight of several homeless families elicited the government’s response that they were “homeless by choice”.  Nevertheless the government still seems rather uneasy about it.  When the predicament of some homeless folk was notably brought to light in 2007 by local filmmaker Martyn See, the censors deemed Mr See’s short film to be unsuitable for those under 16.

The problem is that official attitudes could hinder a measured response to the problem.  Anecdotal accounts suggest that the number of homeless in Singapore could be on the rise in recent months, with social workers relating a sharp uptick in the number of those trying to get admission into shelters.  The situation could worsen as the downturn deepens, given that unemployment as well as foreclosures are on the rise.

Already, the country seems be ill-equipped to cope with a possible increase in the number of homeless people.  The government would prefer the individual to depend on his extended family for help, but such support would be taxed by the severity of the current downturn as well as the decline of the extended family due to low birth-rates over the past years.  The Housing and Development Board (HDB) does offer rental units for homeless folk, but such units are comparatively few in number and there is usually a long waitlist for them, though HDB does provide interim housing to those who are waiting.  It has also recently tightened its criteria for determining who is eligible for rental housing: those who have bought and sold a flat more than twice are permanently barred from renting or even from getting a housing loan from HDB. 

Moreover, there are few shelters that the homeless can turn to, with only one that specialises in displaced families that has room for about thirty families.  Some homeless folk have made their homes in public parks, but their fate is uncertain after the National Parks Board this month reintroduced a system of permits that it did away with in 2004 to regulate those who want to camp in parks.

Help for the homeless, whether private or public, would surely be hindered by the lack of information about the extent of the problem.  On that score, the government certainly needs to do more.  It is instructive that those who fall into homelessness and destitution often face an uphill task to climb out of their predicament – the Sacramento “tent city”, for example, has been existence for a decade and was no recent phenomenon – so what may seem to be a temporary problem brought on by the current recession could in time turn out to be something more durable than expected.

 —–

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

National issues still a concern among Potong Pasir resident: Lina Chiam

By Timothy Lai  More than 20 members and volunteers from the Singapore…

被消协指已结业 Karz车行“感惊讶”

上周五,新加坡消费者协会(CASE)发文告, 指两家车行突然倒闭,造成八名客户至少33万新元的损失。 该协会今年9月至10月31日期间,共收到八个有关上述车行倒闭的投诉,有者申诉他们已经签署买二车合同也取了车,但是该车行却没有在陆路交通管理局(LTA)那里更新车子所有权的记录。 还有投诉个案申诉,已经缴了全额,但是两个月后车子所有权都还没转让,且事主已经数次提醒车商。 不过,昨日消协发文告澄清,其中一家车行 Karz Automobile,在迁离原址后,仍继续运营。 不过消协提醒,既然有关车行还在运营,该协会期望他们履行和尊重与客户之间的协议。 消协解释,此前他们根据消费者投诉,致函到Karz 车行原址,与此同时也电邮以及拨电办公室号码,不过都无人回应。此后他们派人前往该车行原址,才得知已经迁走。 不过,Karz Automobile较后透过代表律师联系上消协,澄清车行还在经营。 不过消协关注有关消费者投诉的问题仍有待解决,仍会与该车行跟进此事。…

Online petition to ban Chinese nationals from entering Malaysia garnered over 370,000 signatures

On Sunday (26 Jan), an online petition calling for the ban of…

Ex-union leader unhappy with WP Jamus Lim use of the word ‘folksy’ in Parliament

On Thursday (15 Oct), a heated debate over a minimum wage erupted…