Last week, immediate past-president of AWARE and three time president, Constance Singam resigned her position as AWARE adviser. In a letter to Aware members, she stated that she is “unable to support, participate, in or sanction the new approach” of the new committee.

We publish the letter below.

AWARE will be holding an EGM to conduct a vote of no-confidence in the new executive committee on May 2. Those interested in becoming members can sign up here.

Dear AWARE member,

These past few weeks have been difficult for me, as you can imagine. You all know of my long-term commitment to AWARE and AWARE’s objectives. In AWARE we have created a space where everyone is welcome; where everyone is respected whatever their choice in life; where I have made life-long friends. But I find myself unable to support, participate in or sanction the new approach of the 2009 Executive Committee of AWARE. I have therefore submitted my resignation from the EXCO as Immediate Past President.

I am writing this email to explain to the AWARE members whose email addresses I have in my personal computer why I have resigned from the EXCO.

The AWARE Constitution states that the immediate past president shall be on the EXCO as an adviser. Members of the 2009 EXCO referred to me as a ‘rock’ and ‘the foundation’, and a source of continuity and point of reference to AWARE’s history and culture. But at the first two meetings of the 2009 EXCO, when I offered my advice on a number of issues it was ignored.

 I was particularly unhappy that my advice on the subcommittee chairs was totally disregarded. When the EXCO proposed to replace all subcommittee chairs with EXCO members, I protested and said it was AWARE’s long-standing practice to give more women, especially young women, the opportunity to acquire leadership skills and empowering them through experiences in sub-committee work.  I reminded them that the coordinators have been working on these issues for some time and that summarily replacing them would be disrespectful and counter-productive.  But EXCO ignored my advice.

The removal of the chair of the CEDAW Committee, Braema Mathi, is especially disturbing as Braema is the Singapore expert on CEDAW. Her work on CEDAW is respected internationally and there is arguably no better person in Singapore to lead the effort to produce the CEDAW shadow report. Yet, she was dismissed summarily without any stated reasons or even a simple thank you.

I am also very concerned about the possible ideological opposition of many members of the 2009 Executive Committee to AWARE’s historic fundamental values. The possible opposition to these values, or at least a lack of understanding of them, was obvious at the AGM when these new members failed to affirm Aware’s values.  Several times those who were standing for election were asked to declare their understanding of feminism and the objectives of AWARE. The responses were, at best, non-committal.

Our values, which are the essence of this organization, are based on the fundamental rights and responsibilities of women as women. These include being treated as informed individuals capable of choice; being deserving of opportunities equal to those of men in education, marriage and employment; and being able to control their own bodies, particularly with regard to sexual and reproductive health. Upholding and promoting these values is at the core of AWARE, and I expect
members who want to serve on the EXCO, particularly as office bearers, to understand and support this.

What the EXCO said in the press release issued on 15th April was a sharp contrast to the behavior of many of its members at our internal EXCO meetings.  In their public statement the EXCO said: “The New Team at AWARE wishes to remember and honour the work of past AWARE members for their vision and endeavours to advance the cause of women in all areas of society through advocacy and community work.” But in private meetings the EXCO showed a complete lack of respect for me, ignoring my advice and even keeping me out of an EXCO meeting when I had the right to be there as stated in the constitution.

News coming to light each day adds to my concern about the intentions and ability of the EXCO to lead AWARE. I was shocked to read the statements made by DBS in the last two days about the conduct of the new AWARE president, Josie Lau. DBS said –  “We are disappointed that Josie knowingly disregarded DBS’ staff code of conduct twice. Such an attitude is not one that DBS, or any other organisation, can condone in a leader.” AWARE certainly should not.

I was even more concerned by the reports that Josie led the marketing team in DBS’s credit card campaign last year which supported the evangelical Christian organisation Focus on The Family. And this morning I discover in the media that Josie, Charlotte, Jenica, Maureen, Sally and Irene apparently attend the same church. AWARE is a secular organisation that embraces diversity of race, age, religion, culture and sexuality, and it must remain so.  I am not at all confident that the current EXCO intends to ensure this.

Though I am resigning from the EXCO I remain committed to AWARE and its work, and I hope you will too. AWARE’s values and its work over the last 25 years are important for Singapore and we must do all we can to ensure it continues to be a voice for women in Singapore and a champion of diversity, tolerance and transparency.

Yours sincerely,

Constance Singam

 —-

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

公积金终身入息计划 提早离世遗产不含累积利息?

如果未到退休年龄就过世,您公积金户头里的钱会哪里去? 资深财务顾问暨时事评论人梁实轩,在去年八月的一篇文章表示,其友人曾向中央公积金局询问以上问题,其中一些细节令他细思极恐。 公积金局架设的”areyouready.sg”网站上,以上的问答如下: 用户离世时,其年金保费会如何处理? 您离世后,相关遗产是会遗赠给受益人。如果是公积金年长者终身入息计划(CPF LIFE),有关遗产则是会员离世后,未使用的年金保费和退休账户的余额(如果有的话)。他们都会和该用户剩余的公积金储蓄,遗赠受益人。 然而,年金保费所赚取的利息,并不构成个人会员遗产的一部分,因为它会用于支付终身收入基金(Lifelong Income Fund),让所有终身入息计划会员都能享有每月入息。 与所有年金产品一样,终身入息计划立基于风险共担的概念。为了让会员们都能享有每月入息,必须汇总年金保费的利息,然后再将有关总利息每月入息给该计划下的所有健在成员。因此,公积金终身入息年金保费所赚取的利息,将不会成为个别成员遗产的一部分。 官网回答具误导性 然而,梁实轩指出,在公积金局官网,在有关“终身入息计划-详情-了解-如果我提前离世,我会失去所有的钱吗?”的选项中,却写到:…

盛港集选区议员林志蔚走访 冀积极改善居民生活空间

盛港集选区议员林志蔚前往盛港安谷走访,积极改善居民的生活空间。 林志蔚今日(7日)在脸书上发文分享走访盛港安谷居民时所遇见的一些课题。他表示,对于居民而言,每人都希望将房子当成舒适的家,因此改善居民的生活空间也成为他主要的工作。 他在走访盛港安谷的旧组屋时也发现一些水管泄漏的问题,林志蔚说,“当我们在走访盛港安谷的旧组屋时,发现有关水管泄漏的问题。在这种情况下,我们将会尽最大的努力协助居民解决问题,尤其是水的问题,会非常困扰居民。” 除了聆听居民的困扰,林志蔚在走访时也遇到一些趣事。他表示,走访时看见有居民将刻有龙头的摆设挂在门边,也是另一种建立自己的家园的一种方式。林志蔚也借此与他们合影留念。 林志蔚也表示,这攸关民众的利益,也是市镇会的责任,因此他们将会竭尽全力,为他们解决目前遇到的困扰。 日前盛港市镇会成立后,工人党也随即分配好各区负责议员,其中何廷儒负责万国(Buangkok)分区、林志蔚负责安谷(Anchorvale)、辣玉莎负责的康埔桦(Compassvale),蔡庆威负责的河谷(Rivervale),并公开电邮和电话联系资料。 此外,他们也将会定期会见居民,了解居民需求。

被指涉诽谤内容来函作者 在警局录供六小时

被指文章涉诽谤内容的作者Willy Sum(笔名),昨日在广东民大厦警察总部录供达六小时,直至晚上7时30分才离开警局。 Willy Sum在今年九月四日,撰写一篇题为《谢健平脸书贴文的启示》的文章(The take away from Seah Kian Ping’s Facebook post),投稿到本社。…

吴仁轩被指 已悄然退出加密银行Seba董事会

本月2日,油运供应商Inter-Pacific Petroleum Pte Ltd (IPP)的司法经理,正式向法庭提出申请,起诉前总理吴作栋之子吴仁轩,追讨1.56亿美元(约2.126亿新元)。 有关诉讼旨在向吴仁轩追讨上述款项,他被指在2019年6月至7月间,支取款项进行贸易融资,但被银行指是“不存在或虚假的交易”。 有鉴于上述诉讼,吴仁轩在一些公司的身份亦受影响,包括在康盛人生集团(Cordlife)卸下主席职务,改任独立董事。 此外,根据财经媒体《Finews Asia》的报导,吴仁轩因“个人因素”,悄然辞去在总部在瑞士的加密银行Seba的董事职务,不过发言人仅透露此消息,并未进一步说明详情。 SEBA Bank 是一家受监管的金融机构,在2019年8月获得了瑞士金融市场监管局(FINMA)的银行和证券交易商牌照。…