Tan Kin Lian

I received two e-mails from a visitor to my blog, www.tankinlian.blogspot.com.

First e-mail

Hi Mr Tan

I have been following with interest your blog on and off especially during the period of “minibonds”. I respect your sense of social justice and your courage and willingness to fight for the underdogs.

I myself have always been neutral to politics. I only write today because on the spur of the moment, I want to pass a few observations about the passing away of the Singapore I grew up in.

I am in my 30s. When I am young, I felt that the government was willing to develop us Singaporeans. Life was simple, relations with people were sincere.

That Singapore is no more. In almost any job I have worked, foreigners equal Singaporeans in number, sometimes they exceed. Even when you interact with people, the locals don’t care for and about the locals. Money is all everyone thinks about. Perhaps it is because we are all forced to struggle with the influx of so many FTs.

When we need employers to give us a chance, we find that the job has gone to some more experienced FT. But they were given chances, even sponsored to take courses, back in their own countries to hone the skills that they have today. 

All familial ties are no more; we have become disposable entities to our companies and our bosses. It is a very lope-sided system where the employer is king. Even some bosses, used to maids, treat employees in the same disposable manner. Forget about receiving any training, you are paid to serve them. Retrenchment and dismissal is sometimes the excuse of poor senior management. The same goes for the present government.

I am neither bitter nor resigned. I am just sad that I cannot identify this country with the one I knew and grew up in. You might tell me I am being sentimental, we must all adapt to the world, there is no free lunch. Yes I have heard that many times. And home-grown Singaporeans are largely a docile bunch willing to bend over backwards with the govt. But why does it seem that the govt makes our problems worse instead of better?

You are very capable man. By writing to you, I don’t dare to aspire for anything. I have signed your petitions and I have written encouraging messages on your blog. I just want to share with you, Singaporean to Singaporean, the loss of the soul and essence of my country.

Hi Mr Tan,

I have visited your blog again and have read the comments to my email. I’m not upset, don’t worry.

I respect what you are doing. But I do not know whether it will succeed. Singapore has changed. The younger Singaporeans are pleasure-loving and hedonistic, the older ones are too busy struggling. And all of us are struggling in this over-populated country and intimidated by a government that can do whatever they like and manipulate whatever law they want. The worst is seeing younger Singaporeans sell out their countrymen for the love of money.

I empathize with those who are poor and suffering. I would not mind contributing if you have any schemes to help them. Under the present government, they are reduced to getting scraps ” qiu sheng bu si, qiu si bu neng” (seeking life is difficult, seeking death is not possible). Perhaps it is possible to set up some sort of recruitment so that matches these people to employers who are willing to pay them fair wages and not exploit them.

As for me, I am thinking of leaving the country next time. I am tired, Mr Tan. I am quite well educated, but I still have some integrity. I don’t want to sell my soul for money like what some people are doing.

My comments

This reader, although much younger than me, expressed the sentiments felt by me and some Singaporeans of my generation.

We were proud and happy to be Singaporeans many years ago. We were part of the struggle to build an independent nation, based on equality and justice, which is respected by many nations around the world.

Today, Singaporeans are disappointed. We are not sure if Singapore still belongs to us or only to those who are in power.

Our views are not sought. Even if we struggle to be heard, we are ignored. We can see fellow Singaporeans, who are weak, being exploited. Even if they are cheated, they are asked to open their eyes.

What is more worrisome to me is that many people care for their own self interest. If they are not affected, they will stay on the sideline. Maybe they are too busy struggling to make a living. This is probably just an excuse.

I like to ask you to read the letter from the grave, by Lasantha Wikrematunga.

He spoke out for others, against injustice and corruption, and paid with his life.

In his letter, Wikrematunga quoted a poem from Martin Niemoller. In his youth, Niemoller was an anti-Semite and an admirer of Hitler. As Nazism took hold in Germany, he saw Nazism for what it was: it was not just the Jews Hitler sought to extirpate, it was just about anyone with an alternate point of view. Niemoller spoke out, and was sent to concentration camps and nearly died.  Here is the poem:

  First they came for the Jews
  and I did not speak out because I was not a Jew.
  Then they came for the Communists
  and I did not speak out because I was not a Communist.
  Then they came for the trade unionists
  and I did not speak out because I was not a trade unionist.
  Then they came for me
  and there was no one left to speak out for me.

I like to ask Singaporeans: Are you willing to speak up for others, against injustice and suppression?

—-

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

打脸总理选举承诺 民主党视频遭网民疯传

民主党秘书长徐顺全在本月2日上载一则视频,获得超过28万的高点击率,以及7千余次分享:视频内容针对剪接总理李显龙在2015年选举承诺,再对比新加坡人面对的残酷现实,引起不少国人共鸣。 这则题为“别随便说说”(Don’t Anyhow Say Things)的视频,开端剪接贸工部长陈振声,在演说时的一段话:“必须谨慎,不要因为是选举季节,就随便说说”。意思就是,政治人物要说到做到,不应随便许下承诺,但却没办法履行。 接着,视频就穿插人民行动党秘书长李显龙,在上届选举的演讲片段,针对其许下的种种承诺,配以国人面对现实处境,一一作出讽刺性的对比。 李显龙提及现今领袖,具备建国元勋的精神,但这段民主党制作的视频,即引用前任首席公务员严崇涛的说辞,指在早期,林金山和吴庆瑞博士从早忙到晚不求回报,但是当把部长薪资调高,情况就开始走下坡。 李显龙称确保建国一代和乐龄群体过上有尊严的生活,但视频引用李光耀公共政策学院黄国豪(译音)教授的说法,指乐龄打工群体的贫穷率显著上升;而今年的报导也显示年长者自杀率比往年高。 至于李显龙承诺提供年轻人可负担、能保值的房屋,国际可负担住宿调查就显示,我国的房产“严重不可负担”;而公共组屋屋契只有99年,到期后就归零。 至于我们的公积金,半数退休者甚至未达到最低储蓄额标准;在2017年,超过20巴仙毕业生近半个月找不到工作,以及我国千禧世代在2016年被评为对就业前景最悲观的群体。 此外,视频也抨击,当前新加坡人工时最长、工作压力最大;李显龙自称是国家的看管者,实则在实行贵族统治;以及年轻运动员无法获得国民服役延期,参加国际足球队等等问题。 李显龙:“所以我们和人民一起,解决生活成本问题,让生活更美好,减轻负担。”…

Christian charity defends “relationship programme” in school

The controversial workshop attended by Hwa Chong Institution (HCI) student, Agatha Tan,…

“坏消息掰成好的” 郑国明抨击官媒报导工伤死亡手法

“坏消息也能掰成好消息,这就是政府操控下媒体做报导的方式。” 人民之声党影子内阁成员郑国明(Cheang Kok Ming)揶揄,即便报导中揭示今年上半年有更多劳工在职场受伤,但官方媒体仍能找到值得“庆贺”的理由,即“职场死亡人数降至七年最低点”。 郑国明是指《海峡时报》在本月1日的报导,据人力部公布的数据显示,今年上半年,有17位劳工在职场不幸身亡。而2018年上半年职场死亡18人;下半年为23人。 “国有媒体怎么能把如此不幸的死亡人数,报导得如此微不足道?” 相比下,今年上半年的职场死亡人数,只比去年同比少一人。人力部在声明强调,这是自2012年一来最低的职场死亡人数。 非致命职场工伤增加 至于死亡意外的致因,高处坠落达四宗,其中两宗发生在建筑领域。而因为架构或机械倒下致死的个案增至三宗;与车辆相关死亡意外则多达四宗。 截至2019年6月底,工伤意外死亡率仍维持每10万名雇员:1.2人的水平。 不过,非致命职场工伤则从去年上半年的6073宗个案,增加至今年上半年的6561宗。 对亡者国籍只字不提…

新一代公路电子收费系统行车器延至明年启用 2023年开始收费

新一代公路电子收费系统将延至2021年启用,即明年下半年起,驾驶者可将阅卡器更换成与新系统兼容的行车器。 陆路交通局今天(8日)下午发文告表示,鉴于疫情的原因,全球的供应链也受到影响,故原定今年启动的新一代公路电子收费系统将延至2021年开始。 安装行车器(On-Board Unit,简称OBU)的工作预计在明年下半年展开,为期18个月,所有本地注册的车辆都可免费将目前使用的阅卡器更换成新的行车器。 陆交局则在2023年启动新的ERP系统。为了让驾驶者能够驾轻就熟,在启动初期,陆交局将不会改用新的收费方式,而是根据地点收费,并定期根据行车速度和拥堵程度调整收费。 当局也说,改用新系统后,仍会按照现有模式清楚标出收费地点,不过届时会使用体积更瘦小的闸门。