TOC’s interview with the Widjaja family and footage of the family’s visit to Professor Chan’s residence.

 

Choo Zheng Xi & Deborah Choo

Desperate for information on the circumstances surrounding their son’s death, David Widjaja’s family arrived in Singapore on Wednesday hoping to meet with Professor Chan Kap Lup. The Professor was David’s mentor at the Nanyang Technological University who was allegedly stabbed by David before the latter fell to his death on March 2.

On Friday, David Widjaja’s parents, brother and an uncle paid a surprise visit to Professor Chan Kap Lup’s home, accompanied by several members of the Indonesian press.

The group arrived at the professor’s condominium in the afternoon at about 3.30pm, hoping to meet with the professor to ask him about what had taken place on March 2 at his office in NTU which led to the alleged stabbing and David’s death.

Affixed to the top right corner of the entrance outside Professor Chan’s house was a small CCTV camera. William rang the doorbell and the family waited expectantly. They were answered with silence.

It was the second time that the family of David Widjaja was in Singapore. The family’s first visit was on March 3 – the day after the stabbing incident.

Expressing his disappointment, William Widjaja, David’s brother, told TOC outside Professor Chan’s house that all he wants is clarity on what took place in the professor’s office on March 2. “I just want to ask him what exactly happened in the room”, said David’s father.

In an interview with TOC earlier in the day, the family said they had also planned to meet several of David’s friends, NTU President Dr. Su Guaning, the police and the press.

David’s relationship with his friends were very good, his father said. “It’s impossible that he committed suicide by jumping down a building and he wouldn’t use a knife to stab anyone,” he insisted. “Definitely, he won’t.”

“We want to find proof that David did not commit suicide”, said William.

Earlier, they told TOC that they were paying the Straits Times office in Toa Payoh a visit as well. William said the purpose was to “clarify” certain reports carried by the local media which they felt were “misleading”. These included assertions by the media that David Widjaja had stabbed the professor, slit his own wrists, and committed suicide by jumping to his death.  “The police are still investigating this case and the results [have not been] released yet,” explained William. “So how can the media report that David stabbed the professor, slit his wrists and committed suicide?”  Asked if they were considering taking legal actions against the Singapore media, William said they were not and only wanted to clarify some “wrong statements in the Singapore media.”

The family feels that many questions are still unanswered. Having received the autopsy report via the mail on  April 4 from NTU, they were puzzled at why the autopsy was not sent directly to them. Asked if they had authorised NTU to collect the report on their behalf, William said, “We didn’t.” His father also insisted that the family did not give any such authorisation.

“The police only told us when they would be giving us the autopsy report,” said David’s father. “They said it would take one month.” He explained that the report should have been passed to the Indonesian embassy in Singapore and the embassy would then be the one which passes it to the family. “It is strange why the autopsy report was given by the police to NTU and not the Indonesian embassy,” said William. They were told by experts in Indonesia that the report would have to be “legalised” first by the embassy before it could be given to the family.

They have sent the autopsy report to medical experts in Indonesia. “The report mostly contained medical terms. Thus, we will seek professional help to decipher them,” William had told The Jakarta Post.  The results are yet to be released.

William mentioned that his cousin knew a friend in NTU who told him that there was an Iranian girl who witnessed David’s fall, and that the family would like to get in touch with her but have so far not been able to. William, however, said they did not know if the story was true. They are also appealing for eyewitnesses to step forward and contact them.

The family returns to Indonesia on Sunday morning.

As of now, TOC has not been able to contact NTU because of the holiday. A separate notification will be put up once we have managed to contact NTU.

—–

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

BCA orders Rivervale Mall to repair wall after photos of building defect circulated online

The owners of Rivervale Mall in Sengkang have been asked to hire…

Ministry of Manpower issues POFMA correction directive against SDP over posts on employment

The Ministry of Manpower has issued three Correction Directions (CD) under the…

动漫展疑未申请表演准证 连累三本国女子在马被捕

动漫展疑未申请表演准证,八名角色扮演者的外籍女子,包括三名新加坡女子,和四名参展男子被马来西亚移民局逮捕。 马国吉隆坡移民局主任哈米迪阿当表示,该局官员于24日在吉隆坡布特拉路展开联合取缔行动,并在一间酒店举行的动漫展中,共检查了52名人士。 未获得PUSPAL准证 他说,该动漫展《Cosplay Festival 4》的主办人,因为没有为嘉宾申请海外艺人表演与电影播放中心委员会(PUSPAL)所发出的表演准证,却在活动上收买周边产品和表演,所以被取缔了。 他指出,该漫画展原定举办两天,于25日结束,但是因为取缔行动,被迫于当天叫停。活动中被逮捕的人士分别来自日本(5人)、新加坡(3人)、泰国(2人)以及香港(1人)。当局也逮捕了一名疑是主办人的马国男子助查。 哈米迪阿当在脸书贴文指出,被逮捕的外国人士数天前使用社交签证入境,有一些人还被发现滥用工作准证。而他表示,此次逮捕行动,当局将援引1959/1963年移民厅法令第56(1)(D)条文(非法收留外劳)和1959/1963年移民厅法令第39(B)条文展开调查。 海外艺人表演与电影播放中心委员会,是在2001年通过马国内阁成立,并被纳入马通讯与多媒体部的委员会,主要是让所有海外艺人来马国从事任何与金钱有关的活动时,都必须获得相关部门准证,以达到审核的效果。 未获得准证而表演或售卖产品的海外艺人,就属触犯了1959/1963年移民厅法令第39(B)条文。一旦被定罪,他们将在被遣送回国前,面对不超过1000令吉的罚款,或6个月监刑,或两者兼施。主办人则会因为触犯了1959/1963年移民厅法令第56(1)(D)条文,面对不低于1万令吉、不超过5万令吉的罚款。

允许八人以上同桌 以铁茶壶装酒售卖 三餐饮场所被下令停业10天

违反安全管理措施,三个餐饮场所被下令停业10天,10个场所被罚款1000元,而五个重新违反措施的餐饮场所则被罚款2000元。 永续发展与环境部昨晚(9月17日)发文告,宣布以上处罚事件,并列出被停业餐馆的违例行为。 位于乌节商业中心的Jiang Hu Xia Ke餐馆违反了冠病19(临时措施)法令中,晚上10时30分后不可售卖和饮用酒精饮品条例,还以铁茶壶内装酒售卖以逃避执法人员的耳目,让顾客饮酒。被识破后,餐馆被新加坡旅游局下令自9月16日开始,停业10天至9月25日。 位于兴业通道(Venture Drive)的96 Food Fusion & Bar则违反了安全距离措施,允许八名顾客同桌,被新加坡食品局下令关闭10天,从本月17日开始至26日。…