The following is an update to the earlier story of Mr Wong Tai Phong titled, “A victim of bureaucratic red tape and inflexible policies.

Andrew Loh

“Luckily you didn’t come yesterday,” Mr Wong says to me as I enter his house. “Why?” I ask. “I had diarrhoea the whole of yesterday,” he says. I ask if it was because of something he ate. He answers that it happens once in a while and that he feels better now. I could see that he looks a little pale.

As he invites me to sit, I ask if he has eaten. “Yes, eat already. I cooked cabbage, rice and tau kua,” he says rather proudly. “That’s good. You should not skip meals,” I said. I then explained to Mr Wong that we’re looking into helping him, particularly about resolving the issue of his uncle’s death certificate and the ownership of the flat. I also told him we will help him cash the $40 cheque from his town council, as mentioned in our earlier report.

“It’s not easy,” he says, “it will involve a lot of money.” I said yes, it might but there are ways to resolve his problems. “Please don’t think of funny things,” I said to him. “Lets just take it one step at a time.” Mr Wong smiles and says nothing.

“I have a whole stack of bills I haven’t paid,” he says as he hands them to me. They’re from the National Healthcare Group, National Heart Centre and the Singapore National Eye Centre. The bills were for amounts of $125, $38, $85 for various treatments and consultations.  “How to pay?” he asks. “You don’t pay soon they send lawyer letters.” He proceeded to show me the plastic bag full of pills which he has been given by the polyclinic. They are for his hypertension, high-blood and stomach ulcer. “Do the pills work?” I ask him. “Yes. If I don’t take them the vein in my head starts to throb.” I told him to continue to take the medication regularly if they help make him feel better.

As our conversation went on, Mr Wong brought up the issue of the lift upgrading which was completed at his block in 2006. “The grassroots people kept coming to knock at my door, asking me to vote,” he says. “You know what they gave me? They gave me an umbrella and a teddy bear,” he says as he shakes his head. I smile. “Did you have to pay for the upgrading?” I enquired. “Of cos!” came his reply. “Three hundred dollars!” I ask if he was able to pay the amount, which was actually $319.57 according to the HDB tax invoice he shows me. “Of cos not. But that time government gave some money, GST rebate or something,” he says. “They gave me $300. I took the money and pay them back for the lift upgrading,” he shakes his head again. “It’s right-hand give, left-hand take back.”

Mr Wong insists on paying what he owes the government. “I don’t want to owe them anything. Everything I owe, I pay them,” he says adamantly. “You owe them, you die.”

“Look at the ceiling,” he urges me. I look up and was quite shocked to see areas of spalling concrete with the metal rods exposed above the threshold to the kitchen. “The kitchen also,” Mr Wong tells me. Indeed, the ceilings in the kitchen, the toilet and in his bedroom are literally falling apart. “You go to HDB, they say you have to pay for the repair,” he says. He has resigned himself to living with it.

I then urge him not to worry about things too much and to go out and walk or maybe take strolls at the nearby mini-park. “Go there? I go! But two times I go, I lose my EZ Link card,” he says. I didn’t know what he means. “I fall asleep and the card slips out of my pockets,” he explains, “and other people take them.” The same has also happened to his identity card. “I had to go to ICA [Immigration and Checkpoints Authority]. First time, fine $300. Second time, fine $600. Third time you will be charged,” he says. When he lost his IC once, the counter staff asked if he had instead sold his identity card to someone else. “I was so upset! I asked her, ‘How to sell? You tell me how, I go sell so I have money to eat!’”

Again I tell him to take things easy and be patient. “Some people have read your story on the website and they offered to help,” I told him, hoping that this will cheer him a little.  “There’s always conflict in these things,” he says. I ask him what he means. “Some people will not believe my story,” he says. “But ask them; can you eat rice with just an egg and some sauce?” I kept silent.

“Can I have your bank account number, Mr Wong,” I ask him. “Sure. It’s there,” he points to a writing pad on the floor. On it was scribbled some numbers. I told him that I will let those who want to help him know about it and maybe he will be able to have some money to get through each day while we try to resolve the other problems he is facing.

As I got up to leave, I ask him what he will be doing the rest of the day.

“I’m going to the library,” he says and smiles as he closes the iron gate.

“I have no more books to read.”

————

Author’s note:

We are seeking ways to help Mr Wong resolve the issue of the death certificate and have written to the Mayor and MP of Mr Wong’s area. We have also gotten in touch with a Commissioner of Oath and have been advised on the possible ways to proceed.

We are awaiting the MP’s advice at the moment.

If you’d like to help Mr Wong, please email us at [email protected] .

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

二跨国企业推26周育婴假 网民忧假期过长恐失业

假期对于就业者而言非常重要,尤其是对就业夫妻而言,育婴假更是如此。跨国企业打破目前的局限,将造福我国就业者,推出26周的育婴假。 英国酒业公司帝亚吉欧(Diageo)将从7月1日开始,为“升职”为父母的男女员工们提供26周的育婴假。而目前,该公司在本地共有150名员工,他们所享有的产假和陪产假分别是16周和两周。 据《亚洲新闻台》报导指出,帝亚吉欧的新育婴假政策也将在北美洲、西班牙、泰国和澳大利亚等地区实行。 该公司大中华区和亚太区总裁Sam Fischer指出,推出有关的政策,是为了打造更具包容性和多样化的员工队伍,并且营造更好的就业环境。 彭博推出过渡育婴假 随着帝亚吉欧的宣布,彭博(Bloomberg)近期也将更新其福利政策,推出26周的育婴假。目前,该公司员工,无论男女都享有照顾小孩的18周育婴假。 彭博表示,26周的育婴假分别是让新父母享有24周的有薪假期后,还有10天的“过渡假期”,即允许员工在24周育婴假后,在接下来的10周内,可每周休息一天。 创始人彭博曾于5月15日发出的声明中指出,该公司是意识到每个家庭的不同,因此推出有关政策,以便可以反映出在全球各地男女同事们的需求。 随着有关新政策的推出,该公司的6名本地员工将从中收益。 其他外企维持保守政策 对于以上两家跨国公司的新政策,人力资源公司万宝盛华集团(ManpowerGroup)新加坡区经理Linda…

没拒绝外国人 司徒国辉:关键在遴选外籍人才素质!

日前,政府统计单位民情联系组(REACH)发布报告,指民调显示多数国人同意对外国人保持开放的态度。 一些报章评论和报导,也似乎在呼应贸工部长陈振声等官方的“主旋律”,强调“我国应持续保持开放”;有者也指探讨收紧外籍专才的政策,会否有损我国“唯才是用”的声誉? 不过,本地食评家司徒国辉也在脸书发文,提醒这些论述都“错重点”,而应该探讨我们需要怎样的外籍人才素质? “你的阿公和太太爷,五湖四海飘洋过海到狮城,用血汗共同创建这个都会,且他们成功了。他们是真的全心全意要让这里变得更好。” 他认为本地更需要这样的人才,关键在于将来筛选人才到我们的小红点时,应该用更小的“滤器”。 司徒国辉也表示,实则一些外籍人士对建设我国亦贡献良多,“我甚至认识他们当中一些人(甚至成为朋友),从他们身上学到很多。” 但是,他也提醒,其他的似乎都只是领取高薪的“长期旅客”,拖家带小到我们的地方,把自家的习俗或习惯强加在本地。 今年8月,就已有一位退休银行家揭露一些大型、老牌外籍银行,倾向雇用外籍人士、排挤新加坡人才,“已是业界熟知之事”,并呼吁当局应严密审查金融领域的这种现象。 有鉴于民间的呼声,政府不得不作出回应,例如人力部把S准证和就业准证的薪金门槛调高,有意借此减少外籍人士进入本地就业市场。 deh, it’s not…

电动脚踏车逆向行驶撞上汽车,被发现安装非法“油门”

近日因陆交局禁用电动滑板车上路,引起民众的议论,因此有关个人代步工具的意外,总是容易引起网民的关注。昨日(19日)有网民就上传自己撞上电动脚踏车的意外视频到Road.sg,引发许多网民的讨论。 视频显示,车主Mohamad Fadil Ibn Nordin是在上月9日晚间八点半左右在在依斯迪阿马回教堂前方,也就是实龙岗北2道,发生意外事故。他在行驶到路口时便碰上了欲冲过马路的电动脚踏车。 可以看出,车主在抵达路口时,先减缓速度再左拐,岂料,再左拐后却立马撞上电动脚踏车。电动脚踏车明显是逆向行驶。随后,车主便下车查看,与电动脚踏车的骑士争论,并拒绝赔偿车主。 车主也表示,自己在下车查看后,发现电动脚踏车安装“油门”。 据悉,安装“油门”是可以让骑士不必踩踏板就可以提高速度,但此设备在2005年已被陆交局禁用。 对此,许多网民纷纷留言,部分网友认为如今要顾及的并不是路人,而是可能会冲出马路的个人代步工具。 网友Randy Chia :…

普杰立认为暂不需禁个人代步工具 网民吁仿效法国禁人行道行驶

“虽然政府考虑实施禁止个人代步工具(PMD),但是目前仍没有必要。” 于周三接受CNA938采访时,交通部高级政务部长普杰立医生表示,个人代步工具是很有用的交通工具,政府没打算因为少数不负责任的骑士,而直接打击。 他曾在周一(10月7日)的国会上指出,“若骑士没有改善他们的行为,或许会禁止个人代步工具(PMD)的使用。” 这是自去年通过活跃通勤法令(Active Mobility Act),规范人代步工具使用后,当局首次出现扬言要禁止的声音。 普杰立表示,随着个人代步工具普及化,相关设备的意外事故也随着增加,在2017年至2018年期间,当局就接获了228起涉及个人代步工具的公路意外,伤者多达196人。 至于媒体曾报导涉及PMD的死亡事故,自2016年来多达八宗,不过此前多数事故多数是骑士自设备上跌倒,或是被其他车辆碰撞多致死。 自从上月发生电动滑板车和脚车相撞,导致一名六旬妇人王美英重创身亡,人们意识到PMD不当使用,对其他民众构成的潜在危机。 近七万人网上联署 因此,坊间频频传出要禁止个人代步工具上路声音,网上联署运动也开跑,目前已经获得将近七万人的签名。 网民们也纷纷质疑为什么不能够禁止个人代步工具。…