Gerald Giam

I am very concerned over what seems to be a lack of efficient procedures in place to avert mass public health tragedies like the recent Geylang Serai rojak stall food poisoning incident.

Three lives have been lost (including one unborn baby), and 146 people have been affected by the food contamination, 48 of whom were hospitalised.

CNA reported that stall patrons started to fall sick between April 2nd (Thu) and 4th (Sat) with food poisoning symptoms such as severe abdominal cramps, vomiting, and diarrhoea. However it was only at 8 am on Sat April 4th that officials from the National Environment Agency (NEA) arrived to shut down the stall.

In another CNA report, a 44-year old woman said she and her mother stopped at the rojak stall for lunch on Friday, and less than six hours later, both women were vomiting and had stomach cramps so severe an ambulance rushed them to Changi General Hospital (CGH). They said it was “mayhem” there and that “there was a huge crowd, many of them holding their stomachs and appearing in pain… I asked around whether they also ate rojak from that stall. They all said yes.”

The woman who miscarried had eaten at the stall on Friday afternoon. She said the rojak smelled unusual, but carried on eating it.

Why did it take so long for NEA to shut down the stall? If people started to fall sick on Thursday, why was the stall allowed to remain open for the entire Friday?

The NEA graded the stall’s hygiene with a “C” grade back in December. While I do not expect NEA officers to check on the stall every day, given the barely passing grade the stall achieved, I feel it deserved tighter scrutiny from health officials.

One 54-year old housewife said that “environment in the centre (Geylang Serai temporary market) is not very clean. Sometimes there is rubbish around and it is very near to the wet market.”

More importantly, surely there should have been a more efficient mechanism to alert NEA of a stall selling contaminated food. Did the doctors that the victims visited on Thursday report the food poisoning cases to NEA immediately after attending to their patients? Is there even a mechanism to do so?

This serves as a lesson that all cases of food poisoning should be taken very seriously. Victims of food poisoning will almost always know the source of their infection. If doctors are required by law to inform the Ministry of Health when they diagnose infectious diseases like SARS, they should also be required to report any cases of food poisoning to the NEA immediately.

The moment a report is made, NEA officers should be activated immediately to investigate the stall or restaurant, and shut it down if necessary to prevent further cases of poisoning. While this could be quite a strain on resources, it is a necessary investment in the interest of public health.

At the same time, there should be an efficient way for consumers to report contaminated food. Not all food poisoning victims visit doctors, and many would detect bad food from its smell before consuming it. There should be a website or hotline for people to report such incidences easily. A general number or website feedback form does not really suffice, given the urgency in which such reports must be acted upon.

Visit soshiok.com for more.

Headline picture from Straits Times.

—–

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

A closer look at Budget 2007

By Edmund The budget statement debate concluded last Thursday. This article ponders…

Minister of Health issues POFMA Correction Notice to Facebook over post about passing of 3-yr-old

The Minister for Health, Ong Ye Kung has instructed the Protection against…

企图骗取生产力津贴 律师被三司判除牌

律师康卡德南,因涉提供假资料以骗取生产力与创新优惠计划(PIC)津贴,在本周三(28日)被特别庭三司宣判吊销律师执照。 57岁被告康卡德南(Kangatharan Ramoo Kandavellu),独资经营律师事务所Kanga & Co,在去年因为向所得税审计官提供假信息,被法庭罚款4500元和缴付4万9212元罚金。 2014年三月,被告透过友人得知PIC,也出席了由Paradize顾问公司主办的解说会。Paradize 由S.詹德兰所有,该公司协助申请者申请PIC津贴。 在上述解说会上,康卡德南曾表示他的律师楼只有一名员工,不符合至少须有三名员工的申请条件。在詹德兰和其下属Sahtyah的协助下,康卡德南把自己的儿子和姐姐,也列为其律师楼员工。 此外,被告在申请表格上虚报律师事务所,花费1万6010元购买管理系统软件和支付商业发展和行销课程的费用等。 根据该骗局协议,如果被告申请到津贴,须付Paradize一半数额。不过国内税务局发现资讯有假而拒绝支付。 三司特别庭昨天审理新加坡律师公会的申请后,决定将已执业15年的康卡德南除牌。…