Betsy Tan

The media has its own ideology and we tend to accept it in an uncritical fashion because we are so exposed to it. The more we are exposed to it, the more invisible it becomes.”

In our media-saturated society, we accept that television shows and films follow certain pre-determined conventions, but we do not relate such conventions with the television news image. According to artist and media theorist, Kenneth Feinstein, we believe news images to be faithful reflections of reality when they have, in reality, gone through many levels of filtering and mediation. In an interview with this writer, he explains more about the inspiration and intention behind “Telegeneric Realities”, his first solo exhibition in Singapore.

BT: What inspired the photo collages of Telegeneric Realities?

KF: I have always been interested in how images are created and presented to the public. After moving to Singapore, I became fascinated with how much the different networks look the same. The uniformity of image and the sharing of source footage interested me. Having been trained as a documentary film maker, I was very conscious of what the accepted rules for making TV news items are. Being trained as a philosopher and media theorist, I tend to take a critical view of what we see (on TV) and how it is presented. Finding our depiction of so-called “reality” to be fairly universal prompted me to create a body of work that emphasised this aspect of our viewing life.

BT: It is interesting that transient screen shots are given permanence in the form of a photo collage. Is there an underlying message?

KF: What I want to get across in this series is the interchangeability of details of the images found on television news. The people on camera or the place where an event happens may constantly change, but the basic images conform to preset conventions. This is why people are removed from the images and a lighter trace of them remains. In the sports images for example, both the car and the tennis players are removed to emphasise the point that the image is fixed and who is on the screen does not matter. As video artist Nam June Paik once said, “Television is like a constantly flowing stream. As the river flows, it does not care much about any particular rock.”

If there is a political message to this work, it is not based on a specific ideology, but rather the idea that the media has its own ideology and we tend to accept it in an uncritical fashion because we are so exposed to it. The more we are exposed to it, the more invisible it becomes. It gets ingrained into our psyche. When we look at news images on television, we tend to forget all the levels of mediation that have gone into what ends up on the screen. From the cameraman to the news producer, several layers of editing and decisions have determined what gets seen. There is very little room for an image that does not fit the pre-designed mould.

BT: There’s a collage of Bush with a diplomat whose face was digitally removed and melded with the background. What message were you trying to get across in that shot?

KF: In this image I was looking at how Third World leaders are presented as faceless and replaceable. The removed person is the President of Uganda. How many people know who he is and how often do we see him on air? But George Bush is known to all of us. He was the head of a nation that mattered.

And how is the Third World covered on television? Starving children and war. Leaders are only seen as either petty dictators or strategic allies. They are presented in terms of their use to the West. If they are not useful, then they can be replaced.

BT: How do you think the state of news media has changed in the last few years? And what changes will we see in the next few years?

KF: Has the state of the news changed? Not really. Over here, the news follows the BBC style, which is better than the CNN and Fox News form. There are less battling talking heads, but otherwise it is all the same.

Media worldwide has consolidated into the hands of a few very powerful people and corporations, the best known being Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp. They use the news to push whatever agenda that keeps them rich and in power.

Broadcast news is not a place for the voice of the people. That is what the Internet has become. How long it will take for these people to co-opt the Internet? I don’t know.

Catch “Telegeneric Realities” at 2902 Gallery at Old School, Mount Sophia from now till 16 April 2009. Mr Feinstein will be giving a talk to the public on 18th April, Saturday, 3 to 4pm at 2902 Gallery, Workshop Room.

For more details, click here.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

指时事专页贴文内容不实 卫生部援引“泼马”发更正指示

卫生部今日(14日)援引《防止网络假信息和防止网络操纵法案》(POFMA),透过防假消息法办公处对时事脸书专页State Times Review(STR)的管理人陈智祥(Alex Tan),发出更正指示。 同时,脸书也接获当局发出针对性更正指示( Targeted Correction Direction)。 这已是上述专页管理人第二次领到来自新加坡政府部门的更正指示。去年11月28日,内政部也同样援引《防假消息法》,要求前者更正贴文。 当局指上述脸书专页在昨日(13日)的帖文中作出多个不实指控,例如指政府无法追踪病患感染源、政府是“唯一一个”告诉人民不必戴口罩的单位、“中国客工”可在14日缺席假期间,从政府那里领到每日100元的津贴、人力部长杨莉明努力从中国引进更多劳工;以及七个国家限制到新加坡理由,因对我国公共卫生措施缺乏信心。 已厘清其中51病患的关联 对此当局驳斥,截至13日中午12时,在58起确诊病例中,已确认其中51起病患是否去过中国,或厘清和此前病例的关联。…

Source of new Covid-19 case in California is unknown; community spread of virus may happen in US

A confirmed case of Covid-19 of a person who appeared to not…

一教师确诊 凤山Sparkletots幼园关闭消毒

人民行动党社区基金会(PCF)旗下凤山126座的Sparkletots幼儿园,一名老师确诊患上武汉冠状病毒(COVID-19),该中心在今日(24日)关闭并进行消毒。 PCF是在昨日接到卫生部通报。有关教师自上周三(18日)至周五拿假,尽管周三中午曾回来处理些事务数小时,不过当时状况良好。她在周五开始出现症状并求诊。 幼儿培育署(ECDA)在昨日发给家长的信函指出,学前教育单位自上月起已提升预防措施,包括增加体温检测频率、确保教职员和孩童的个人及环境卫生、限制访客和取消大型活动等。 至于PCF学前教育管理部高级总监玛丽尼(Marini Khamis)则告知媒体,有关教师上周三返校,不过所处理的事务未涉及向学生授课。 不过,该教师是在出现症状前两日到校,经考量当局认为暂无关闭中心14天的必要。 玛丽尼也再三向家长保证所有PCF旗下的Sparkletots幼儿园在疫情下采取必要措施。 王乙康三大理由解释开课原因 学校幼儿园是在本周一如期开课。王乙康曾在脸书上发长文解释开课背后的三大考虑。包括引述国大、世卫专家说法, 指疫情对于年轻人的影响不如成年人;学校会采取更多预防措施,保证学生的安全,以及确保有儿女的前线工作人员可专注抗疫等。 就在本月4日,国际商业园的新意元幼源( Creative O…

PAP Murali: “I am not a perfect father”

An online post surfaced after Murali Pillai was confirmed to be People’s…