Andrew Loh

In June 2008, the media reported a scuffle among a group of Nepalese Gurkhas stationed in Singapore. The dispute was over wages they were receiving.

The Singapore police, at that time, was reported to have said that they were investigating the incident “as an internal one”. According to a Straits Times report on 21 June 2008:

Commenting on the incident, Dr Teo Ho Pin, who chairs the Government Parliamentary Committee for Law and Home Affairs, said it was important to ascertain the ‘root of unhappiness’ among the Gurkhas and resolve any issues quickly in order to keep their morale high. (Source)

Nothing further was reported since about how the dispute was resolved.

Now, a Nepalese website has reported that 16 of the men involved in the scuffle were dismissed from the force following the “protest” over pay in Singapore last year. (Source)

After the men returned to Nepal, a group of them staged a kidnapping of forty-eight-year old Rum Bahadur Gurung (right), an officer in the Gurkha contingent here who had returned to Nepal after his retirement from service in Singapore three months earlier. The leader of that protest last June, Sanman Limbu, who was among those dismissed was the mastermind behind Gurung’s kidnapping, according to police.

According to the My Republica website,

An unidentified group of about five persons had whisked away Gurung in a taxi on the morning of March 27 from his residence at Amarawati Colony in Sainbu. The group then began threatening to take life over phone should the victim´s kin failed to pay Rs 65 million in ransom. 

The kidnapping was believed to be for revenge over Limbu’s sacking. My Republica reports that Limbu admitted to police that he would not have been sacked from his lucrative job in the Singapore police had Gurung, who was then serving at the administration department with the police force, acted in his favor.

On March 31, after five days in captivity, the Nepalese police rescued Gurung from his kidnappers. Altogether seven men have been arrested for the kidnapping.

“This is the second life I am living now,” Gurung said at a press conference after his rescue. “I am greatly indebted to Nepal Police for their effective rescue operation.”

Read My Republica’s report here.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

鄞义林力挺遭抹黑的独媒与维权人士,吁对“事实”再三推敲确认

针对早前《网络公民》与自由新闻工作者韩俐颖被点名指出,接受外资、或聘雇外国人撰写负面新闻,企图分裂新加坡一事,博客兼维权人士鄞义林(Roy Ngerng),力挺独立媒体与本地维权人士,表示对于被政客抹黑的感同身受。 鄞义林于昨日(26日)在脸书上发文表示,身为曾被抹黑的受害者的他而言,他最初亦认为新加坡是个民主法治的社会,不料在他受到迫害后,他发现国家掌控了媒体的报道,将所有言论指向支持政府,当时他的想法因而产生了变化。 “当我看到主流媒体以某种方式刻画我的形象时,我就知道这些所谓的新闻,其实应该称之为政府宣传片,都是政府事先规划或者准许发放的消息,以控制人民的思想”,鄞义林说道。 在不断看见主流媒体对他的批评和报道负面新闻后,鄞义林表示,他曾试过反驳他们但却不得要领。他也澄清,很多人认为,他会有一群支持者或其他独立媒体会支持他,但事实上,当时他唯一抗辩的管道,就只有自己的博客和脸书。 消息来源必须再三推敲,检测新闻真实性 至此之后,当他看见部长正抹黑其他维权人士与媒体时,他说他必须先再三推敲确认部长的消息来源。他也解释他如何检测新闻的真实性。 “我的经验告诉我,我了解必须反复搜索消息来源,找出消息最初的来源之地,所以我会设法到放置部长所说的演讲或消息的官网上查看是否与记者或维权人士相符。然后,如果有任何标明是“真相或事实”的消息,我会查看各种不同政府来源、国际报告、学术研究、或其他值得信赖的消息网站,以作证实说法。而你,也应该如此。” 他强调,如果不反复推敲确认消息来源,他不能站在判断的角度去看待,因此他说,若选择接受部长的意见或抹黑韩俐颖与许渊臣,如同形成压迫,因为不愿意去查看消息,并在缺乏依据下做出判断,并不属于中立,是一种政治上的偏见。 鄞义林:只有实事求是的报导,才会获读者支持 另外,鄞义林也强调独立媒体的立场,有别于财力雄厚的主流媒体,独立媒体并不会轻易报道,因为他们承受不起失去读者的信任与声誉,在主流媒体的主导下,独立媒体只能靠着报道事实来维持营运。 “因此,新加坡独立媒体没有那个“本事”,他们要么报道事实,要么失去工作。”他说。…

SPF’s clarification on Singaporean’s four-month ordeal in Malaysia, sheds no light but raises more questions

Finally, after one month of probing into Mr Mohan’s four-month ordeal in…