Echoing the words of Madonna’s song You Must Love Me, Cookie Boy wonders, “Where do we go from here?”… 48 hours after the lights dimmed out and the curtain fell on Earth Hour.  

By Cookie Boy

In an ironical twist on Monday 30 March, Sydney, the place where Earth Hour began, had another reason to celebrate Earth Hour when parts of the CBD and Eastern Suburbs were hit by a power failure which sent the city into a blackout. 

That same night at 8.30pm, I observed my own Earth Hour of sorts.  I switched off my lights and all other electrical products in my room except for the fan.  I left the lights in the living room on for my mother who was watching television as it would be unreasonable to demand an elderly woman suffering from glaucoma to watch television under candlelight.   

The first ten to fifteen minutes were fine.  But as the clock slowly ticked away, I got fidgety and restless.  There was nothing I could do with the lights switched off in my room.  I could sleep…but I wasn’t tired.  I couldn’t read.  I couldn’t write.  I couldn’t get onto the internet to do some research.  I couldn’t get any work done.  I couldn’t get productive…  

And if you had watched the series Californication or the movie Confessions of a Shopaholic, you’ll understand perfectly the difficulty of weaning off certain things.  In this case I’m a ‘light-up-aholic’.  Just as Rebecca Bloomwood the protagonist in Confessions could hear store mannequins urging her to buy, buy and buy, I could hear my room light telling me: “Turn me on.  Turn me on.  You know that you need me!”

After 20 minutes, I finally surrendered.  I didn’t turn on the lights.  I simply fled with a book into the living room but not without first turning off the fan.  At that moment I understood how Hank Moody (David Duchony’s character in Californication) and Bloomwood felt.  Meanwhile, the lights to my room and the other parts of the house sans living room remained off at least until 930pm. 

It was a failed experiment on my part.  And for those who turned off the lights during that one hour on Saturday 28 March, I must say: “Good for you!”        

I was chatting over MSN to a fellow Singaporean D who is studying at the University at Sydney and the conversation veered towards Earth Hour.       

“Nobody cared about Earth Hour except me,” D said. 

“What did you do?” I asked. 

“I did the whole hour exercise and everybody was still partying away.  I just stayed in perpetual darkness with a friend who joined me, and we played Scrabble in candle light,” D replied.

“Why did you do that for?” I continued. 

“To show my support for Earth Hour,” she said.  “You know how much we can save if everyone on earth actually does it?  Tons of fuel.”

I don’t have any exact statistics to support D’s claim.  But as Carine Seror, Corporate Responsibility, World Wildlife Fund (WWF) Singapore and the campaign manager had in an earlier article pointed out, Earth Hour was just a “symbolic gesture” and that the world could not be saved just by turning out the lights for just that one hour a year en masse. 

What happens after 2130: 59 then?  Do our efforts to fight climate change end here?  Where do we go from here?

As Rove McManus, host of the Australian variety show Rove, stated on his Sunday 29 March show: 

“I think…I happen to think Earth Hour is a great idea cause it can help the environment because you switch off the lights for an hour and I think that cataracts three days of burning rubber and Formula One exhaust fumes.”

That’s some food for thought. 

While we let scientists and researchers figure out new means to harness alternative energy resources such as solar or wind power which would help cut down on carbon emissions, perhaps we could consider some of the suggestions Seror had given, or continue to follow your own energy conservation methods at your home or office.  I’m not a die-hard environmentalist, but I try to do my tiny wee bit for the environment by re-using paper and printing on two sides.   

On another front, corporations too have joined in the bandwagon to help fight climate change as part of their Corporate Social Responsibility efforts.  One of TOC’s reporters, Teng Jingwei, noted that corporations such as Singtel, Philips, Nokia, Starbucks Coffee and Coca Cola were present at the Green Carnival. 

Starbucks Coffee?  Wait a minute!  Weren’t Starbucks accused of wasting water by leaving their taps running to wash utensils in a method known as a dipper well?  The Straits Times report on 8 October 2008 highlighted that Starbucks Coffee Singapore had admitted that they had indeed employed this system to meet health standards.  To be fair to Starbucks Coffee Singapore, they did clean up their act by discontinuing this practice.   

Then again, how could a company who claims to be committed to the environment engage in such a wasteful act of resources?  This is Starbucks’ commitment:

“By taking steps to reduce waste from our operations and recycle, we can preserve the earth’s natural resources and enhance the quality of lives around the globe.  Starbucks actively seeks opportunities to minimise our environmental impact and help create a healthy planet.”

And in another surprising discovery, Nadine Well of Heart of Green found out that the Starbucks cups aren’t recyclable.  According to the author, the cups are made up of paper fibre and low density polyethylene plastic for the liner which renders the cup unrecyclable.    

In a form of indirect admission, Starbucks Coffees in its FAQ on Starbucks Shared Planet states:

“Our ability to recycle varies among neighborhoods and communities.  Every town or city has different requirements for what is recyclable or compostable.  That is why we need to find cups that work for everyone to meet our goal of having our cups be 100% reusable or recyclable by 2015.  In the meantime, you can help by using reusable cups.”

Let us examine our own green practices before we quickly accuse Starbucks of ‘greenwash’.  Notice how the company shifts the duty of care back to the consumer!  What’s our responsibility then?  A complete consumer boycott of Starbucks isn’t realistic.  Bringing our own mugs which we will later have to wash is perhaps a lesser evil compared to the unrecyclable Starbucks cups if we don’t use too much water to clean them.    

Meanwhile, in an interview with TOC, Doctor Brendan Mackey of the Climate Change Institute, Australia National University, warns of the grave situation of runaway climate change and its threat to people living in low lying areas due to rising sea levels.     

Anyway, I don’t think a return to a primitive lifestyle would help arrest the problem of climate change since we have become over-reliant on the conveniences brought about by electricity thirsty modern technologies.  However, the few minutes of sacrifice in darkness has taught me something – to appreciate lights even more. 

Although I’m a ‘light-up-aholic’, I guess I’ll try to make some changes to my lifestyle…maybe I’ll shift my activities to the void deck!

 ———–

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

被医理会吊销行医执照,医生获判上诉得直

日前一名被指专业行为不当而医药理事会吊销执照的外科医师向高等法院上诉,于昨日(27日)获判上诉得直。 根据《雅虎新闻》报道,被告Dr Looi Kok Poh被指未给予一名外籍劳工充分的病假,外籍劳工当时是在工作期间发生工伤意外。 昨日,以大法官梅达顺为首的上诉庭三司审理上诉,裁定法庭未能证实被告违背了医疗守则。 法官认为根据所搜到的证据,不足以说明被告已违背了医疗守则所定义的专业操守。 法官也指出并无证明指正被告专业操守严重失当,故推翻了原先裁决,撤销对医生处分。 法官也特别指出,被告在根据伤者当时的条件,判定他可担任轻松职务,而且在医学上适当的职务是有利于伤者的康复。被告也同时向伤者与随同的工作人员一并解释相关轻松职务。 事发经过 2011年8月7日,印裔工人瓦达(译名,32岁)在造船厂工作时,由于钢板脱落压到右手造成右手中指粉碎性骨折。 当时,由被告进行第一阶段的手术。后来,被告诊断认为瓦达恢复良好可出院,并决定给予瓦达一天病假,并注明伤者在之后的七天内只能执行轻松职务。然而,当晚伤者右手再次疼痛,被安排见其他医生,医生当时却给出两天病假。…

抵触《公共秩序法》被禁两周 行动艺术家施兰今获释

经历两周监禁,艺术家和社运分子施兰(Seelan Palay)于今日获释。在脸书上,他宣称他的艺术表演:“32年:镜子的审问”随着他的监禁划下总结。 在本月3日,新加坡法院判处施兰因在未获许可证下进行表演活动,触犯《公共秩序法》罪名成立,罚款2千500元,或监禁两周。而施兰选择了监禁的惩处。 他在未有代表律师的情况下,出席9月26日的法庭审讯。面对主控官的审问,施兰坚称其艺术表演全程以平和的方式进行,且没有告知、直到任何人追随他,从原表演地点国家艺术馆走到国会。 他也强调,表演他全程沉默,仅靠镜子来表达含义,以及针对警方的询问才作礼貌答复。 当主控官质问,其表演具有目的、是否影射政府当年监禁谢太宝的决策是错误的,施兰则回应,艺术本身并不必然有任何目的。 在去年10月,施兰独自一人站在国会前,举着“一面画有图案的镜子,批判政府前国会议员谢太宝遭囚禁和软禁32年,进行无声抗议。在警方劝离不果而被当场逮捕。 谢太宝在1966年在内安法令下被逮捕,被政府指控从事亲共、颠覆政府活动。结果,这名议员在未经审讯和起诉下,被监禁至1998年才重获自由。 ‘网络公民’以视频记录下施兰的和平抗议,后者并无作出多大的威胁,为了控诉对前国会议员谢太宝的不当囚禁待遇,只是拿着一面镜子站在艺术馆和国会前和平抗议。 他不曾干扰民众,也不曾反抗警方,然而施兰最终还是被逮捕了。逮捕施兰的行动,显示当权者无法容忍异议与民众的批判,也延续了司法的不公义。

谎称已先面试二本地人 物流公司面控

一家物流公司为外籍员工申请就业准证(EP,即Employment Pass),却谎称已先面试了两名本地人,结果面控。 物流公司(Ti2 Logistics),是在去年7月26日,为外籍员工周建新(Zhou Jianxin译音),向人力部申请就业准证。该公司聘请后者为业务发展经理。 该公司在申请时,谎称已面试了两名本地人,并公平考虑他们是否能够胜任。 若该公司被判罪成,在雇用外来人力法令下,将面对监禁两年,或最高2万元罚款,或两者兼施。 过去有雇主谎报客工工资,以取得就业准证 事实上在去年1月,亦有一家餐饮公司GD集团,涉欺瞒人力资源部,虚报多达20名客工的工资,以符合申请就业准证(Employment Pass)的要求。 结果该集团面对20项抵触雇佣外来人力法令的控状,被法庭罚款9万4500元。 人力部在2014年,在公平考量框架下架设职业库,乃是为了强制企业在聘请外籍人士前,优先从本地人中物色人选。…

Eight men own the same wealth as the poorest half of the world

There is a new estimation which shows that just eight men own…