Connect with us

Uncategorized

Mohamed Kamaluddin

TOC investigates the death of foreign worker Mohamed Kamaluddin. By Andrew Loh.

Published

on

Andrew Loh (Additional reporting by Deborah Choo)

*Visit Migrants Workers Singapore for consolidated news reports and articles about migrant workers.

All that most Singaporeans know about Mohamed Kamaluddin, 28, is that he is the Bangladeshi worker who contracted chicken pox and died in a dormitory in Tagore Industrial Avenue.

Little else is known about him or his family – and the circumstances surrounding his death.

The Online Citizen decided to find out and raises some questions.

On 28 December 2008, Kamaluddin was found motionless in his bed in the dormitory at 468 Tagore Lane. The Today newspaper reported the next day that Singapore Civil Defence Force paramedics had pronounced Mr Kamaluddin dead at 1.38pm. (Today) It also said that “Mr Kamaluddin’s exact cause of death will only be known later in an autopsy report.”

The Straits Times, on 31 Dec, said “an autopsy has identified heart and lung failure as the cause of death. It is not clear if this was related to his bout of chickenpox. A coroner’s inquiry will be held to ascertain this.” (See here and here.) The cause of his death, according to the death certificate which TOC obtained a copy of, was “cardio respiratory failure pending further investigations.” The time of death was recorded as 12.42pm.

There has been no word from the coroner’s office so far about the coroner’s inquiry.

Absence of medical treatment

Time of death aside, what is more troubling is the medical treatment, or lack of, which was given to Kamaluddin and the rest of the infected workers. TOC understands that Kamaluddin had had chicken pox for at least a week (according to news reports), though some workers told us he, and some others, had had the infection for as long as a month. This seems to be corroborated by photos taken by Mr AKM Mohsin, Chief Editor and CEO of Bangladeshi newspaper, Banglar Kantha. Mr Mohsin had visited the workers at the 468 dormitory on the 21st of November last year – more than a month before Kamaluddin died (28 Dec). The picture (right) showed several workers who had chicken pox and were being segregated from the rest. Notice that they are sleeping on the floor. It is, however, unclear if Kamaluddin was one of them.

Mr Mohsin, who spoke to the workers during his visit in November, told TOC that the only treatment they received from their employer were a few tablets of panadol, according to what the workers said.

Their employer, Mr Paul Lee of Gates Offshore, said that Kamaluddin “had gone for a run” on the morning of the 28thand that his supervisors had told him that Kamaluddin was not suffering from chicken pox.  “I have 700 to 800 workers in the dormitory,” Mr Lee said when asked by the Today newspaper about the lack of medical treatment the men were receiving. “It is not unusual if someone dies a natural death.”. (Today)

After Kamaluddin was found dead, the rest of the infected workers, 10 in all, were then sent to Tan Tock Seng hospital to be treated. (See here).

Kamaluddin’s body was sent home to Bangladesh after Muslim rites were performed on the 30th of December. According to the Straits Times, Gates Offshore paid for this and the cost of sending his body home. (See here)

Gates Offshore had also deposited S$167 into Kamaluddin’s bank account. It did not say what this was for.

Questions:

Negligence?

The first question that comes to mind is one of potential negligence on the part of several parties.

According to Chapter 91.A of the Employment of Foreign Manpower Act (EFMA):

3. The employer shall be responsible for and bear the costs of the worker’s upkeep and maintenance. This includes the provision of adequate food, as well as medical treatment.

 6. The employer shall send the worker for a medical examination by a registered Singapore doctor as and when directed by the Controller. The employer shall also bear any medical expenses incurred by the worker for the medical examination.

7. The employer shall ensure that the worker is not ill-treated, exploited, wilfully neglected* or endangered. This includes providing the worker with adequate rest, as well as rest day(s) in accordance with the terms of the employment contract. The employer shall not involve or allow the worker to be engaged in any illegal, immoral or undesirable conduct or activity.

(*The “Controller” refers to the Controller of Work Passes. *Emphasis mine.)

Mr Paul Lee said that his supervisors had told him that Kamaluddin had gone for a run on the morning of the 28th, the day he died, and that he was not suffering from chicken pox. (See here.) If indeed this is true, it would bring into question the issue of competency of the supervisors – since Kamaluddin, by all accounts, had been suffering from chicken pox for at least a week prior to his death. Indeed, he hadn’t eaten for two days prior to his death too.

According to the Straits Times, Lee said that “a dormitory supervisor goes on morning rounds to check if any worker is unwell.” If this was true, why did the supervisor do nothing to help Kamaluddin who had been sick for at least a week?

According to what some workers told TOC, Kamaluddin was given some panadol tablets for his condition by the supervisors. If this is true, it would mean that the supervisors knew that Kamaluddin was unwell. Why, if this was so, was he not sent to the doctor’s then? And is administering panadol the standard medical treatment for workers who are sick, no matter what the illness?

Ministry of Manpower

The Ministry of Manpower (MOM) seem to accept that Kamaluddin had died of “cardio respiratory failure”, as indicated in the death certificate, and has not, as far I am aware, probed further into the incident.

The next question one would ask is one of hygiene. In the EFMA, it is stated: “The employer shall provide safe working conditions and acceptable accommodation for the worker.”

In a Straits Times report on 21 January 2009, it said that those who contracted chicken pox in December last year were not quarantined. This would allow the infection to spread to other workers. Indeed, besides Kamaluddin, 10 others were infected with the chicken pox.

Conditions at the 468 dormitory was so bad that the Ministry of Manpower found it “non-compliant”:

Last November, the Manpower Ministry (MOM) checked the dorm and found it to be ‘non-compliant’. It said it told employers to move the workers out by today.

After last month’s outbreak, the Health Ministry (MOH) had also advised on-site supervisors to clean the facilities, isolate the cases and provide separate toilets, among other things.(Straits Times)

The question is whether the MOM or the MOH did any follow-up after those warnings last year. Were the instructions complied with? Are the poor conditions and food the reasons for the latest outbreak of chicken pox cases there as well, as reported by the Straits Times on the 21st of January, where three workers have contracted the condition?

The workers at 468 told TOC that they were given only two meals a day – one at 7am in the morning and another at 7pm in the evening. The meals consisted of a variance of “two pieces of bread” and “watery curry” in the morning, and rice and watery curry in the evening. At times, the food turned bad and the workers have had to throw them away. As a result, they would go hungry as they do not have money to buy their own food, since they are not given work and are not paid by their employer.

Was Kamaluddin also given the same watery curry and rice/bread when he was sick? Had the food turned bad as in previous instances? Was this the reason why Kamaluddin did not eat the food on the two days before he died?

Finally, is it MOM’s policy to allow “700 to 800” workers to be housed in such atrocious conditions? While MOM may have given warnings to errant employers about this, the fact that the workers have been there for months shows that MOM has been laxed in its enforcement.

These questions remain unanswered. The employer seems to have been let off without any meaningful inquiry into the circumstances surrounding Kamaluddin’s death – particularly the question of willful negligence, which would contravene what is indicated in the EFMA.

A son, father and husband

Mohamed Kamaluddin, who had been in Singapore for two months, was a kerosene seller back in his village of Gaffar Gaon, Bangladesh, before he came to Singapore. He has a wife, Shahnaz, and a son, Samrat, 5. His 70 year old mother, when told of his death, was so stricken with grief that she could not even speak a word. His wife and son now live with Kamaluddin’s elder brother, Shamsul, 48, a farmer.

His family has assumed his debts and his wife will have to sell Kamaluddin’s own land when the creditors come calling in about 2 months. They had sold the family land and borrowed from friends to raise the S$7,000 for Kamaluddin to come to Singapore. Shahnaz, 24, presently depends on her in-laws to survive. Samrat has stopped going to school as they cannot afford to send him.

“When Kamaluddin died,” she told Mr Mohsin who visited the family in Bangladesh, “my future, my dream, died with him.”

At Kamaluddin’s funeral in his home town of Mymensing, 200 villagers turned up to pay their respects.

He had been in Singapore for two months and was promised a job in the shipyards.

In the end, he was paid S$167 – and only after he died.

Many questions remain unanswered about Kamaluddin’s death. One can only hope that Kamaluddin’s story is one which will not be repeated. The only way, it seems, that if this were to be so, is for those who were derelict in their duties and responsibilities to be first held accountable.

CHICKEN pox is still spreading among workers living in dormitories at Tagore Industrial Estate, and migrant worker advocacy groups say little has been done by employers to improve living conditions even after a recent death. – Straits Times, 21 January 2009

————

The workers at the 468 dorm were moved to another dorm at Seletar West Farmway 6 on 21 Jan 2009. See this report by Straits Times.

Special thanks to Mohsin for the pictures.

————

Read also:

Blood, sweat and tears by Al Jazeera

Highly organised scams throughout Asia by Al Jazeera

Singapore is my second home by Ching Ann Jie

Muddy Singapore swallows China workers by Alex Au

179 foreign workers abandoned by employer by Boris Chan.

Rights groups call for tighter regulations by TWC2 & HOME.

Singapore is my second home by Ching Ann Jie

TOC Expose: Repatriation companies by Jolovan Wham.

A 19th century page from a 21st century draft by Ng Sook Zhen.

“I hope Singapore government punish them” by Andrew Loh.

The Story of Delowar by Deborah Choo.

Mega Development projects and labour supply chains – who is responsible? by Stephanie Chok.

Sent home with $600 by Deborah Choo.

Continue Reading
Click to comment
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Indonesia

Miss Universe cuts ties with Indonesia chapter after harassment allegations

The Miss Universe Organization severs ties with Indonesia franchise due to harassment claims. Malaysia edition canceled.

Women allege body checks before pageant. Investigation launched. Safety prioritized.

Indonesia winner to compete in November finale. Height requirement controversy.

Published

on

WASHINGTON, UNITED STATES — The Miss Universe Organization has cut ties with its Indonesia franchise, it announced days after allegations of sexual harassment, and will cancel an upcoming Malaysia edition.

In the complaint, more than a half dozen women said all 30 finalists for Miss Universe Indonesia were unexpectedly asked to strip for a supposed body check for scars and cellulite two days before the pageant’s crowning ceremony in Jakarta.

Their lawyer said Tuesday that five of the women had their pictures taken.

“In light of what we have learned took place at Miss Universe Indonesia, it has become clear that this franchise has not lived up to our brand standards, ethics, or expectations,” the US-based Miss Universe Organization posted Saturday night on social media site X, formerly known as Twitter.

It said that it had “decided to terminate the relationship with its current franchise in Indonesia, PT Capella Swastika Karya, and its National Director, Poppy Capella.”

It thanked the contestants for their bravery in coming forward and added that “providing a safe place for women” was the organization’s priority.

Jakarta police spokesman Trunoyudo Wisnu Andiko said Tuesday that an investigation into the women’s complaint has been launched.

The Indonesia franchise also holds the license for Miss Universe Malaysia, where there will no longer be a competition this year, according to the New York-based parent organizer.

In a lengthy statement posted to Instagram, Indonesia franchise director Capella denied involvement in any body checks.

“I, as the National Director and as the owner of the Miss Universe Indonesia license, was not involved at all and have never known, ordered, requested or allowed anyone who played a role and participated in the process of organizing Miss Universe Indonesia 2023 to commit violence or sexual harassment through body checking,” she wrote.

She added that she is against “any form of violence or sexual harassment.”

The Jakarta competition was held from 29 July to 3 August to choose Indonesia’s representative to the 2023 Miss Universe contest, and was won by Fabienne Nicole Groeneveld.

Miss Universe said it would make arrangements for her to compete in the finale, scheduled for November in El Salvador.

This year’s Indonesia pageant also came under fire for announcing a “significant change in this (year’s) competition guidelines” with the elimination of its minimum height requirement after it had crowned a winner.

In its statement, the Miss Universe Organization said it wanted to “make it extremely clear that there are no measurements such as height, weight, or body dimensions required to join a Miss Universe pageant worldwide.”

— AFP

Continue Reading

Malaysia

A Perodua service centre in Kuantan, Malaysia went viral for its strict dress code, Perodua responds

A dress code for vehicle servicing? A Malaysian car brand’s service centre dress code signage has puzzled netizens, raising queries about the need for attire rules during a routine service.

The manufacturer responded with an official statement after a flurry of comments, seeking to clarify and apologize.

Published

on

By

MALAYSIA: A dress code signage positioned at a service centre belonging to a prominent Malaysian car brand has sparked bewilderment among Malaysian netizens, who question the necessity of adhering to attire guidelines for a simple vehicle servicing.

The signage explicitly delineates clothing items that are deemed unsuitable, including sleeveless tops, short skirts, abbreviated pants, and distressed jeans.

The car manufacturer swiftly found itself flooded with comments from both inquisitive and irked Malaysian netizens. This surge in online activity prompted the company to issue an official statement aimed at clarifying the situation and extending an apology.

In a post that gained significant traction on the social media platform, politician Quek Tai Seong of Pahang State, Malaysia, shared an image to Facebook on Monday (7 Aug).

The image showcased a dress code sign prominently displayed at a Perodua Service Centre in Kuantan. Within the post, Quek posed the question: “Is this dress code applicable nationwide, or is it specific to this branch?”

The signage reads, “All customers dealing with Perodua Service Kuantan 1, Semambu, are requested to dress modestly and appropriately.”

Adding visual clarity to these guidelines, the sign features illustrative graphics that explicitly outline clothing items deemed unacceptable, including sleeveless tops, short skirts, short pants, and ripped jeans.

Delineating the specifics of the dress code, the signage stipulates that male visitors are expected to don shirts accompanied by neckties, opt for long pants, and wear closed shoes.

Conversely, female visitors are advised to don long-sleeved shirts, full-length skirts, and closed-toe footwear.

Perodua’s dress code sparks online uproar

Following the rapid spread of the post, Perodua’s official Facebook page found itself inundated with comments from both intrigued and frustrated Malaysian netizens, all seeking clarifications about the newly surfaced dress code policy.

Amidst the flurry of comments, numerous incensed netizens posed pointed questions such as, “What is the rationale behind the introduction of such regulations by the management? We demand an explanation.”

Another netizen expressed their dissatisfaction, arguing against the necessity of the rule and urging Perodua to take inspiration from the practices of other 4S (Sales, Service, Spare Parts, and Survey) automotive dealerships.

A concerned Facebook user chimed in, advocating for a more lenient stance, asserting that attempting to dictate customers’ clothing choices might not be in the company’s best interest.

Someone also commented in an angry tone, “Oi what is this? Going there for car service, not interview or working, right.”

As the discourse unfolded, it became evident that while some inquiries carried genuine weight, others chose to inject humor into the situation, playfully remarking, “If I wanted to buy a Myvi, I should buy or rent a formal attire first.”

“I sell economy rice at a hawker centre, I have never worn a long sleeve shirt and a tie… I guess I will not buy a Perodua car then.”

“I guess they will not serve those who wear short pants.”

Perodua addresses dress code controversy

As reported by Chinese media outlet Sin Chew Daily News, the manager of Kuantan’s Perodua Service Centre had acknowledged that the images on the dress code signage were misleading.

In response, the manager divulged that discussions had transpired with the head office, leading to the prompt removal of the signage to prevent any further misconceptions.

The manager clarifies, “We do encourage visitors to adhere to the dress etiquette, but we won’t go to the extent of restricting their choice of attire.”

He also revealed that currently, no complaints have been directly received from the public.

However, feedback from certain customers was relayed through Perodua’s agents.

Perodua also released an official statement by chief operating officer JK Rozman Jaffar on Wednesday (9 Aug) regarding the dress code on their official Facebook page.

The statement stated the dress code etiquette is not aligned with their official guidelines and they are currently conducting an official investigation on the matter followed by corrective measures to avoid the same incident from happening.

Perodua also extends its apologies for any inconvenience caused.

 

Continue Reading

Trending